Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
2011-12-08 10:46 Conserving a critical landscape connectivity in<br />
south India<br />
Jones, S*, LORIS-The Biodiversity <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>;<br />
The hill ranges of the semi arid lower Eastern Ghats in Chittoor district of<br />
Andhra Pradesh, India are part of its larger landscape connectivity with the<br />
Western Ghats, a Biodiversity Hotspot. The Eastern Ghats is an important<br />
bio-geographic region much valued <strong>for</strong> its floral diversity, endemism and<br />
complex geology. <strong>Conservation</strong> of this connectivity is critical <strong>for</strong> the recolonization<br />
of the remnant isolated populations of many species of<br />
global conservation significance. Situated between two National Parks<br />
within the district, these lesser-known dry-deciduous <strong>for</strong>ests are also part<br />
of an elephant corridor. The protection of this connectivity between these<br />
isolated habitats is extremely important to overcome the barriers <strong>for</strong> the<br />
distribution of various other species, to ensure their genetic interchange<br />
and facilitate seasonal movement. For the local village communities,<br />
traditionally, these <strong>for</strong>ests have been a major source <strong>for</strong> subsistence. Some<br />
of these <strong>for</strong>est patches in the past were conserved as ‘Sacred Groves’ by<br />
these communities and are island gene pools of many threatened species.<br />
Involving the communities in protection of habitat corridors and stepping<br />
stones by improving contiguity and habitat quality could be an important<br />
part of an overall regional landscape conservation framework.<br />
2011-12-07 14:00 History and Land Use Effects on Biodiversity in<br />
European Boreal Systems<br />
Jonsson, BG*, Dept of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University;<br />
The European boreal <strong>for</strong>est covers more than 700 million ha. Its industrial<br />
utilization started in the early 1800s in the southern parts of Fennoscandia<br />
and has since gradually moved to the northeast and during the late 1900s<br />
finally reached the Ural Mountains. This timber frontier was a first wave<br />
of extraction focused on the most valuable trees. During the 1900s, large<br />
scale clear-cutting has been introduced and is now the major harvesting<br />
method. In Fennoscandia, and increasingly in Russia, this has led to large<br />
landscape trans<strong>for</strong>mation, with major changes in natural disturbances,<br />
tree species composition and age structure. Only Russia harbor larger<br />
landscape of pristine <strong>for</strong>ests, while only scattered fragments of natural<br />
<strong>for</strong>ests remain in other countries. This transition has caused major decline<br />
in <strong>for</strong>est biodiversity and <strong>for</strong> example, the Fennoscandian redlists include<br />
more than 2000 species. This contrast with the FAO status description,<br />
that show increasing <strong>for</strong>est cover in northern Europe – while failing to<br />
acknowledge the sever situation <strong>for</strong> biodiversity due to the loss of natural<br />
<strong>for</strong>ests. To provide a better knowledge basis, the Barents Protected Area<br />
Network (BPAN) has been established. Taking its starting point in the<br />
CBD Program of Work <strong>for</strong> Protected Areas, it supports the establishment<br />
of a representative network of protected areas that has a high potential in<br />
safeguarding the biodiversity, functional natural ecosystems and related<br />
ecosystem services in the region.<br />
2011-12-08 14:45 How SCB Can Help IPBES Make International<br />
Agreements Affecting <strong>Conservation</strong> More Effective In Conserving and<br />
Restoring Biodiversity?<br />
Jonsson, BG*, Dept of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University;<br />
IPBES has the potential to become an important process, linking best<br />
<strong>available</strong> knowledge to political processes <strong>for</strong>ming conservation policy. In<br />
order to fulfill its vision, SCB as a leading learned society in the area of<br />
conservation t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e needs to seriously consider its role and contribution.<br />
A first step was taken when the ad-hoc committee on IPBES was <strong>for</strong>med<br />
in 2009. With representatives from all sections it has followed the process<br />
and participated in recent meetings, including the first IPBES plenary two<br />
months ago. The current challenge <strong>for</strong> IPBES is to get the best science<br />
onboard and creating a sense of common ownership with the scientific<br />
community. This is an ongoing process that SCB need to support by; -<br />
Monitor the <strong>for</strong>mal process and participate in upcoming meetings -<br />
Make strong links to the regional sections and support their involvement -<br />
Seek representation in the IPBES plenary and its executive body -Develop<br />
and update its expert of rooster with the needs of IPBES in focus - Provide<br />
updated in<strong>for</strong>mation to our membership and the scientific community at<br />
large on IPBES and its needs This suggest that the ad-hoc committee need<br />
to continue its work, that IPBES should be a focal issue <strong>for</strong> both global and<br />
regional policy committees and that the EO needs to make a strong ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />
in developing rooster of experts.<br />
2011-12-09 11:15 Wild thing, I’m just not that into you: Examining<br />
exotic pet owner’s preference <strong>for</strong> captive-bred or wild-caught animals<br />
JOSEPH, LIANA*, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Courchamp,<br />
Franck , Université Paris Sud; Red<strong>for</strong>d, Kent, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong><br />
<strong>Society</strong>;<br />
Commercial farming of endangered species is promoted as a mechanism <strong>for</strong><br />
protecting wild populations from over-exploitation. In theory, by flooding<br />
the market with a farmed alternative, the demand <strong>for</strong> wild-caught varieties<br />
will be reduced. Despite some successes, t<strong>here</strong> are strong arguments<br />
against farming. One such argument is that wild-caught varieties are often<br />
preferred to the farmed alternatives. If this is true then farming will fail<br />
to protect wild populations as poaching will continue and may, in some<br />
cases, be exacerbated by the presence of a legal product on the market.<br />
Here we examined consumer preference <strong>for</strong> wild and farmed varieties of<br />
exotic pets. First, we used a market survey to examine the volumes sold<br />
and prices paid <strong>for</strong> wild and farmed varieties. Second, we used an internetquestionnaire<br />
to examine acquisition criteria. We discovered that source<br />
is one of the main choice criteria <strong>for</strong> acquisition by pet owners: farmed<br />
varieties are valued more than the wild-caught varieties. This is the first<br />
time a preference <strong>for</strong> farmed products has been demonstrated empirically;<br />
other studies have demonstrated a preference <strong>for</strong> wild-caught varieties of<br />
food and traditional medicines. This result is important when compared<br />
to these other studies as it may help to explain why commercial farming<br />
may sometimes successfully reduce the pressure on wild populations of<br />
species that are used in the pet-trade but may not benefit the conservation<br />
of species used <strong>for</strong> other purposes.<br />
2011-12-09 17:15 Genetic Structure and Connectivity of Tiger<br />
(Panthera tigris tigris) Populations in Central Indian Forests<br />
Joshi A*, Post-Graduate Programme in Wildlife <strong>Biology</strong> and<br />
<strong>Conservation</strong>, Bangalore; Ramakrishnan U, National Centre <strong>for</strong><br />
Biological Sciences, bangalore ; Edgaonkar A, Indian Institute of<br />
Forest Management , Bhopal;<br />
Over the last century t<strong>here</strong> has been a massive reduction in the size of tiger<br />
habitats in India. One of the important areas supporting tiger populations<br />
in India is the Central Indian <strong>for</strong>ested landscape; facing the serious problem<br />
of habitat fragmentation. While the focus of the current conservation<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>ts is few protected areas (PAs), this study attempts to evaluate the<br />
importance of <strong>for</strong>est patches in between, based on their effect on the genetic<br />
structure of tiger population in this landscape. Non-invasive sampling of<br />
tiger DNA in six protected areas was carried out by collecting scats. The<br />
identification of different populations, genetic structure and assignment<br />
tests were conducted based on 10 polymorphic microsatellite marker data<br />
<strong>for</strong> 47 individuals. The results reveal presence of 5 different populations<br />
in the sampled region. FST values suggest high historical connectivity in<br />
the Central Indian landscape. The assignment tests shows evidence <strong>for</strong><br />
present long distance migration of individuals. The Least Cost Path analyses<br />
designated routes in the landscape, which could possibly be facilitating<br />
movement of tigers. This study provides an insight to the importance of the<br />
<strong>for</strong>est connectivity and the potential dispersal of large carnivore like tigers.<br />
2011-12-06 11:15 Complementing Community-Based Marine<br />
Management Initiatives With Strategic Planning to Meet Local- And<br />
National-Scale Objectives In Fiji<br />
Jupiter, SD*, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong> Fiji Country Program;<br />
Mills, M, ARC Centre <strong>for</strong> Excellence <strong>for</strong> Coral Reef Studies, James<br />
Cook University; Pressey, RL, ARC Centre <strong>for</strong> Excellence <strong>for</strong> Coral<br />
Reef Studies, James Cook University;<br />
Most marine protected area networks are generally initiated in an ad hoc<br />
manner, with reserves that are often located in places that do not contribute<br />
to the full representation of biodiversity targets. In Fiji, locally marine<br />
managed areas (LMMAs) have grown rapidly in number from 1 site in<br />
1997 to approximately 150 LMMAs in 2009, with at least 216 separate<br />
customary closures. While the main objective <strong>for</strong> establishment of LMMAs<br />
is to improve food security, as a large collection of management actions, the<br />
network can also support the Fiji Government commitment to effectively<br />
protect at least 30% of Fiji’s inshore areas. To determine how much the Fiji<br />
LMMA network contributes to national objectives, we used an innovative<br />
approach to gap analysis that considered the size of the managed areas<br />
and the potential effectiveness of the management actions, as defined by<br />
79