Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
budget. We find that the species selected under a maximal coverage<br />
objective are not the species that are currently targeted <strong>for</strong> monitoring.<br />
If costs, dependencies and uncertainties in response are not incorporated<br />
into the planning process, decisions will be more costly or less efficient,<br />
and unin<strong>for</strong>mative or suboptimal species might be monitored. By explicitly<br />
stating objectives and exploring uncertainty be<strong>for</strong>e monitoring takes place,<br />
it is easier to adaptively manage and monitor populations, and account <strong>for</strong><br />
and audit investment decisions. Our framework will enhance the utility and<br />
transparency of monitoring programmes in the future.<br />
2011-12-06 12:15 Utilizing Australia’s wet tropics rain<strong>for</strong>ests and<br />
ecotourism to educate tourists about major threats to rain<strong>for</strong>ests, such<br />
as climate change<br />
Turton, SM*, School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, James Cook<br />
University, Cairns, Australia;<br />
The Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area (WTQWHA) was<br />
proclaimed in 1988 after a prolonged battle between the logging industry<br />
and conservationists. Since the proclamation, sustainable ecotourism has<br />
become the dominant industry utilizing these internationally recognized<br />
tropical rain<strong>for</strong>ests with an estimated net value of AU$1B pa to the regional<br />
economy. While the WTQWHA are not threatened by many of the<br />
direct and insidious <strong>for</strong>ces being inflicted on tropical <strong>for</strong>ests in other parts<br />
of the developing world, they are not immune to threats such as climate<br />
change and invasive species. Due to past land use change, the WTQWHA<br />
comprises of many small <strong>for</strong>est remnants on the coastal plain and Atherton<br />
Tableland, interspersed with large blocks of contiguous <strong>for</strong>est on the less<br />
accessible mountainous areas. In recent times, t<strong>here</strong> has been a strong<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>t applied to restore landscape connectivity between remaining <strong>for</strong>est<br />
remnants through use of wildlife corridors and riparian restoration along<br />
degraded waterways. My talk will present a framework demonstrating<br />
how to combine world class rain<strong>for</strong>est science from the WTQWHA with<br />
ecotourism to provide a plat<strong>for</strong>m to educate Australian and international<br />
tourists about the major threats to tropical <strong>for</strong>ests around the world.<br />
2011-12-08 13:15 Rethinking barriers and bridges to AM: risk,<br />
uncertainty, and indeterminism.<br />
Tyre, A.*, University of Nebraska; Michaels, S., University of<br />
Nebraska;<br />
Adaptive Management doesn’t provide what people need in all<br />
circumstances. Why? One reason is the failure to acknowledge that t<strong>here</strong><br />
are social origins of indeterminism with different consequences than<br />
natural sources of indeterminism. Consequently, we introduce the idea of<br />
social indeterminism as a <strong>for</strong>m of not knowing what will happen that arises<br />
from the unpredictability of human interactions. We argue that Adaptive<br />
Management is most suited <strong>for</strong> situations w<strong>here</strong> social indeterminism is<br />
low. We develop a matrix of natural and social indeterminism <strong>for</strong> explaining<br />
w<strong>here</strong> Adaptive Management is most useful, and w<strong>here</strong> it is most likely to<br />
be dissatisfying. We go on to discuss strategies that may be applicable when<br />
social indeterminism is high.<br />
2011-12-07 17:45 How does salmon aquaculture affect marine fish<br />
biodiversity and ecosystem structure?<br />
Uglem, Ingebrigt*, Norwegian Institite <strong>for</strong> Nature Research;<br />
Dempster, Tim, Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne;<br />
Bjorn, Paal-Arne, NOFIMA; Sanchez-Jerez, Pablo, Department<br />
of Marine Sciences and Applied <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Alicante;<br />
Fernandez-Jover, Damian, Department of Marine Sciences and<br />
Applied <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Alicante;<br />
Coastal ecosystems are the most productive and exploited of marine<br />
ecosystems. Of the various agents of anthropogenic change to coastal<br />
ecosystems, sea cage fish farming is among the most pervasive and is<br />
known to alter biodiversity and ecological processes in many ways. Our<br />
studies show that while salmon farms cover a limited area, they are highly<br />
attractive to a range of wild fish species, which aggregate in their immediate<br />
vicinity in large numbers. The constant supply of lost feed from cages is<br />
the primary mechanism <strong>for</strong> aggregation of wild fish. Wild fish aggregating<br />
at farms modify their diets, condition, fat-content and tissue fatty-acid<br />
distributions. Changed diets might affect the reproductive potential of wild<br />
fish, as well as palatability, due to use of vegetable oils in the feed. Levels of<br />
various pollutants also differ among farm attracted and non-attracted fish<br />
and movements of attracted fish may be a potential pathway of pathogen<br />
transfer. Finally, farms may affect natural migration patterns of wild fish and<br />
also change the susceptibility of some species to fishing. In sum, our results<br />
demonstrate that salmon farms may be regarded as “artificial” hotspots of<br />
biodiversity, which also could constitute ecological traps <strong>for</strong> some species.<br />
These findings have a range of implications both <strong>for</strong> the society and <strong>for</strong><br />
conservation.<br />
2011-12-08 18:30 Taxonomic and systematic revision of species of the<br />
genera Gobio and Romanogobio in the light of frequent hybridization<br />
Urbankova, S*, Institute of Vertebrate <strong>Biology</strong>, v.v.i., Czech Republic<br />
; Mendel, J, Institute of Vertebrate <strong>Biology</strong>, v.v.i., Czech Republic ;<br />
Vasileva, E, Zoological Museum, Russia; Nowak, M, University<br />
of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland; Stefanov, T, National Museum<br />
of Natural History, Bulgaria; Sanda, R, National Museum, Czech<br />
Republic; Kosco, J, University of Presov, Slovakia; Halacka, K,<br />
Institute of Vertebrate <strong>Biology</strong>, v.v.i., Czech Republic<br />
The presented paper deals with the taxonomy, phylogeography, hybridization<br />
and current distribution areas of 20 species of gudgeons of the genera Gobio<br />
and Romanogobio in the Eurasian context. The level of endangerment<br />
resulting from sympatric occurrence, the end area and frequency of<br />
hybridization events is evaluated. A comprehensive revision of three newly<br />
discovered taxa was finished and their species status identified. The species<br />
of gudgeons, not analyzed so far, were added into the pilot phylogenetic<br />
study with a view to determination of their systematic relations within both<br />
the genera. For the purpose of biodiversity inventory of the Czech Republic<br />
the originality and quantity of the taxa with newly proposed species status<br />
was evaluated. From the point of view of conservation a new identification<br />
method, S7indel diagnostics, was <strong>for</strong>mulated and its contribution in the<br />
Eurasian context was evaluated. Against the background of genotypization<br />
an attempt was made to develop a morphologic key of some species of the<br />
two genera both <strong>for</strong> the professional and general public. From the point of<br />
view of museum conservation, a type series of newly revised species from<br />
the territories of the Slovak and Czech Republics including barcodes and<br />
detailed vouchers was assembled. The study was carried out within the<br />
framework of the research project no. 206/09/P608 supported by the Grant<br />
Agency of the Czech Republic.<br />
2011-12-07 15:45 Per<strong>for</strong>mance of terrestrial vertebrate taxa as<br />
indicator groups <strong>for</strong> the identification of priority sites <strong>for</strong> conservation<br />
Urquiza-Haas, T. *, The National Commission <strong>for</strong> Knowledge<br />
and Use of Biodiversity ; Koleff, P. , The National Commission <strong>for</strong><br />
Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity ;<br />
<strong>Conservation</strong> planning is inevitable based on the use of surrogates. We<br />
determined whether a system of land areas <strong>for</strong> conservation designed <strong>for</strong><br />
one terrestrial ver¬tebrate taxon can be appropriate <strong>for</strong> the rest of the<br />
vertebrate taxa.. <strong>Conservation</strong> area systems were generated <strong>for</strong> each taxon of<br />
vertebrates (amphibians, rep¬tiles, birds and mammals) with Marxan. The<br />
system of conservation areas identified <strong>for</strong> the group of am¬phibians had a<br />
smaller area (477 planning units of 256 km2) than the other groups, while<br />
the system identified <strong>for</strong> birds was three times larger. Systems designed<br />
<strong>for</strong> amphibians and reptiles were able to represent a higher proportion of<br />
species from other groups (80% and 86% respectively), while the sys¬tem<br />
designed <strong>for</strong> birds was to the least effective <strong>for</strong> the species of the other<br />
taxa (i.e. it represented the lowest number of species over a larger area).<br />
It was estimated that the priority sites <strong>for</strong> amphibians and birds are, on<br />
average, able to represent, within an area equal in size, 80.1% and 60.9%<br />
of the species of other groups, respectively. By contrast, bird spe¬cies were<br />
represented almost entirely (97.8%) by the systems designed <strong>for</strong> other<br />
taxa. The results indicate that, while no conservation area system designed<br />
<strong>for</strong> a single taxon is entirely appropriate <strong>for</strong> the other groups, the reptiles<br />
and amphibians are the most effective surrogates, since they achieve the<br />
representation of a very high proportion of species of the other groups.<br />
171