28.10.2014 Views

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />

2011-12-08 11:00 New Zealand Aquaculture Development, Spatial<br />

Conflict and Ecological Outcomes<br />

Collins, Meghan*, Victoria University of Wellington;<br />

The Blue Revolution is upon us, as aquaculture increasingly supplements<br />

seafood products in the world market. Conflict over use of space has<br />

occurred in regions of the globe w<strong>here</strong> aquaculture has intensified, and a<br />

salient theme in global aquaculture growth is the challenge of reconciling<br />

development with spatial conflict. New Zealand follows the pattern of global<br />

growth in aquaculture. This research is qualitative and uses documentary<br />

analysis and interviews with key in<strong>for</strong>mants to explore the strengths and<br />

weaknesses of the New Zealand science-policy system to address ecological<br />

outcomes in spatial conflict. Two case studies are explored, one of user-user<br />

conflict (water quality) and one of user-ecosystem conflict (benthic habitat).<br />

Four models <strong>for</strong> science are identified within the NZ science-policy system:<br />

the expert-based science model, the commercialised model, the civic model,<br />

and the traditional ecological knowledge model. These are used to create<br />

a conceptual framework from which documentary analysis and interview<br />

data is analysed. Results treat the degree to which each model <strong>for</strong> science<br />

considers water quality and benthic habitat, and identifies the strengths<br />

and weaknesses of each model <strong>for</strong> doing so. Discussion draws upon the<br />

implications of using science in agenda-driven decision-making, what<br />

constitutes the “best possible science” <strong>for</strong> use in policy, and the possibility of<br />

scientists as stakeholders in aquaculture development. Recommendations<br />

are made as to policy mechanisms and economic incentives to rein<strong>for</strong>ce the<br />

strengths of each model <strong>for</strong> science. This study offers valuable insight into<br />

achieving workable social and ecological improvements by linking experts<br />

with stakeholders in decision-making.<br />

2011-12-08 11:10 Recovery After a Disturbance of Litter Fauna<br />

Communities in a Temperate and a Boreal Forest<br />

Comor, V.*, Wageningen University; van Langevelde, F.,<br />

Wageningen University; Berg, M., VU University Amsterdam; Prins,<br />

H., Wageningen University; de Bie, S., Wageningen University;<br />

The effects of anthropogenic disturbances and their recovery play a major<br />

role in biodiversity conservation, but predictive theory about both the<br />

recovery and the effects of environmental conditions on this recovery is still<br />

lacking. To compare the effects of disturbance on litter fauna communities<br />

and the effect of environmental conditions, we sprayed diesel fuel on 100<br />

m2 plots in a temperate and a boreal <strong>for</strong>est, and collected arthropods two<br />

weeks be<strong>for</strong>e, two days, six months and one year after the disturbance with<br />

pitfall traps. The impact of the disturbance was much greater in the boreal<br />

<strong>for</strong>est, w<strong>here</strong> t<strong>here</strong> was no litter layer. Surprisingly, high species richness<br />

and abundance did not act as insurance <strong>for</strong> the communities in this biome;<br />

they were in fact even more impacted, since the richness and abundance<br />

of all the communities were equally low after the disturbance. Animal’s<br />

body mass had no significant effect on the impact or the recovery, and<br />

dispersal capabilities had a significant effect <strong>for</strong> the impact only. Functional<br />

groups based on diet were unevenly affected by the disturbance in the<br />

two biomes, but all recovered. Some groups (scavengers, coprophagous)<br />

have been favored in one of the two biomes. Our study shows that the<br />

same disturbance can have different effects depending on environmental<br />

conditions. Thus, knowing the characteristics of the environment would<br />

help predicting and explaining the consequences of a disturbance and<br />

hence, adapting conservation plans.<br />

2011-12-06 13:15 What 20 Years of Science & Management Can Tell<br />

Us About Dolphin-Watch Tourism: The Bay of Islands as a Case Study<br />

Constantine, R.*, University of Auckland;<br />

Dolphin-watch tours started in the Bay of Islands in the early 1990s with a<br />

single 6m vessel. In 1993, t<strong>here</strong> were concerns that this activity may affect<br />

the behaviour and distribution of these wild dolphins, t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e a research<br />

project was initiated later that year by the University of Auckland. Initial<br />

research focused on common and bottlenose dolphins but it was shown<br />

that, as the industry was growing, the bottlenose were the most vulnerable<br />

of the two species. T<strong>here</strong> were differences in dolphin behaviour around<br />

tour-vessels and dolphin response to swim-with dolphin activities differed<br />

by swimmer placement. These short-term response studies are common<br />

in this field as they often fulfill the time-frame required by conservation<br />

managers. With long-lived, slow-breeding species, like whales and dolphins,<br />

long-term studies are required to understand the population level effects of<br />

human disturbance. With this in mind a detailed study focusing on the<br />

bottlenose dolphin population size, habitat use and responses to vessels<br />

and swimmers continued from 1996-2000 and we found considerable<br />

changes in dolphin behaviour, specifically around tour-vessels and when<br />

vessel number increased. We found the dolphins had become sensitised<br />

to swimmer placement and would not rest when dolphin-watch vessels<br />

were present; this was of concern as the industry had developed rapidly<br />

since tourism impact research started in 1994. Changes were made to the<br />

operators\’ permits allowing only the least invasive swimmer placement,<br />

limiting the amount of time spent with dolphins and a break during the<br />

day when boats were not allowed to interact with dolphins. In addition a<br />

moratorium was put in place to stop further development of the industry.<br />

But further research found the number of bottlenose dolphins frequenting<br />

the Bay had declined and they had drastically changed their habitat use<br />

within the Bay meaning new exclusion zones were ineffective. The cause<br />

of this decline and change in habitat use is currently unknown, but with<br />

long-term impacts showing displacement and decline in reproductive<br />

success in other populations, these possibilities cannot be ignored. T<strong>here</strong><br />

are considerable challenges <strong>for</strong> scientists studying the effects of tourism<br />

on already impacted populations, especially with dynamic marine species<br />

such as dolphins. The requirement to protect the animals, gather reliable<br />

data on the population and still protect the interests of industry provides<br />

challenges <strong>for</strong> managers. In the Bay of Islands, they have tried to manage<br />

all these needs with varying success. Our experience suggests other regions<br />

considering the development of dolphin-watch tourism should make sure<br />

pre-tourism data are collected and then the decision as to whether this <strong>for</strong>m<br />

of tourism be allowed should be made after understanding the population.<br />

This will minimise conflicting needs and protect the animals’ welfare, which<br />

should be <strong>for</strong>emost <strong>for</strong> all nature-based tourism activities.<br />

2011-12-07 17:15 <strong>Conservation</strong> in rural-amenity landscapes: socialecological<br />

interactions shaping private land conservation practice<br />

Cooke, BR*, RMIT University;<br />

Rural landscapes in many parts of the world are becoming increasingly<br />

multifunctional through lifestyle-orientated migration into regions once<br />

the domain of productive agriculture. While research has highlighted<br />

the increasing heterogeneity of rural land use, little is known about the<br />

conservation management actions (or absence of action) of new rural<br />

landholders. Insights into landholder actions in this context are critical,<br />

given ef<strong>for</strong>ts to address ecosystem fragmentation. This research explored<br />

the conservation practices of landholders in the hinterland regions of<br />

Melbourne, Australia, through an ethnographic methodology of in-depth<br />

interviews and participant observation. Land management practice proved<br />

intimately bound up with personal landscape interactions. Trial and<br />

error practices and observations of ecosystem function proved pivotal in<br />

in<strong>for</strong>ming either active or passive management philosophies. The legacy<br />

of past agricultural uses also framed notions of ecosystem resilience or<br />

fragility. Social networks of shared practice were less likely to be ‘across the<br />

fence’ relationships with neighbours observed in productive landscapes. A<br />

desire to own rural ‘space’ bounded conservation knowledge and action<br />

at the property scale, yet practices were sporadically shared through social<br />

networks. Conceptualising new rural landscapes as a social-ecological<br />

mosaic of property-scale practices may assist government ef<strong>for</strong>ts to engage<br />

landholders and achieve landscape scale objectives.<br />

2011-12-06 17:00 <strong>Conservation</strong> genetics of Malleefowl (Leipoa<br />

ocellata)<br />

Cope, T.M*, University of Melbourne; Mulder, R, University<br />

of Melbourne; Dunn, P, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee;<br />

Donnellan, S, South Australian Museum;<br />

Extensive land clearance in Australia over the past 100 years has led to<br />

wide scale fragmentation of mallee habitat. The Malleefowl is an Australian<br />

endemic Megapode which has suffered up to 50% reduction in range<br />

over the past 25 years. It is considered threatened or endangered in each<br />

occurring state in Australia. This study aimed to document genetic variation<br />

in Malleefowl and to determine appropriate management actions. Results<br />

of genetic variation across the range of Malleefowl show a very shallow<br />

haplotype network, suggesting recent range expansion from a historical<br />

bottleneck. In addition, we found no population structure or isolation by<br />

distance throughout the entire continent of Australia. This suggests that<br />

insufficient time since rapid population expansion has resulted in absence<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!