Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
2011-12-08 11:00 New Zealand Aquaculture Development, Spatial<br />
Conflict and Ecological Outcomes<br />
Collins, Meghan*, Victoria University of Wellington;<br />
The Blue Revolution is upon us, as aquaculture increasingly supplements<br />
seafood products in the world market. Conflict over use of space has<br />
occurred in regions of the globe w<strong>here</strong> aquaculture has intensified, and a<br />
salient theme in global aquaculture growth is the challenge of reconciling<br />
development with spatial conflict. New Zealand follows the pattern of global<br />
growth in aquaculture. This research is qualitative and uses documentary<br />
analysis and interviews with key in<strong>for</strong>mants to explore the strengths and<br />
weaknesses of the New Zealand science-policy system to address ecological<br />
outcomes in spatial conflict. Two case studies are explored, one of user-user<br />
conflict (water quality) and one of user-ecosystem conflict (benthic habitat).<br />
Four models <strong>for</strong> science are identified within the NZ science-policy system:<br />
the expert-based science model, the commercialised model, the civic model,<br />
and the traditional ecological knowledge model. These are used to create<br />
a conceptual framework from which documentary analysis and interview<br />
data is analysed. Results treat the degree to which each model <strong>for</strong> science<br />
considers water quality and benthic habitat, and identifies the strengths<br />
and weaknesses of each model <strong>for</strong> doing so. Discussion draws upon the<br />
implications of using science in agenda-driven decision-making, what<br />
constitutes the “best possible science” <strong>for</strong> use in policy, and the possibility of<br />
scientists as stakeholders in aquaculture development. Recommendations<br />
are made as to policy mechanisms and economic incentives to rein<strong>for</strong>ce the<br />
strengths of each model <strong>for</strong> science. This study offers valuable insight into<br />
achieving workable social and ecological improvements by linking experts<br />
with stakeholders in decision-making.<br />
2011-12-08 11:10 Recovery After a Disturbance of Litter Fauna<br />
Communities in a Temperate and a Boreal Forest<br />
Comor, V.*, Wageningen University; van Langevelde, F.,<br />
Wageningen University; Berg, M., VU University Amsterdam; Prins,<br />
H., Wageningen University; de Bie, S., Wageningen University;<br />
The effects of anthropogenic disturbances and their recovery play a major<br />
role in biodiversity conservation, but predictive theory about both the<br />
recovery and the effects of environmental conditions on this recovery is still<br />
lacking. To compare the effects of disturbance on litter fauna communities<br />
and the effect of environmental conditions, we sprayed diesel fuel on 100<br />
m2 plots in a temperate and a boreal <strong>for</strong>est, and collected arthropods two<br />
weeks be<strong>for</strong>e, two days, six months and one year after the disturbance with<br />
pitfall traps. The impact of the disturbance was much greater in the boreal<br />
<strong>for</strong>est, w<strong>here</strong> t<strong>here</strong> was no litter layer. Surprisingly, high species richness<br />
and abundance did not act as insurance <strong>for</strong> the communities in this biome;<br />
they were in fact even more impacted, since the richness and abundance<br />
of all the communities were equally low after the disturbance. Animal’s<br />
body mass had no significant effect on the impact or the recovery, and<br />
dispersal capabilities had a significant effect <strong>for</strong> the impact only. Functional<br />
groups based on diet were unevenly affected by the disturbance in the<br />
two biomes, but all recovered. Some groups (scavengers, coprophagous)<br />
have been favored in one of the two biomes. Our study shows that the<br />
same disturbance can have different effects depending on environmental<br />
conditions. Thus, knowing the characteristics of the environment would<br />
help predicting and explaining the consequences of a disturbance and<br />
hence, adapting conservation plans.<br />
2011-12-06 13:15 What 20 Years of Science & Management Can Tell<br />
Us About Dolphin-Watch Tourism: The Bay of Islands as a Case Study<br />
Constantine, R.*, University of Auckland;<br />
Dolphin-watch tours started in the Bay of Islands in the early 1990s with a<br />
single 6m vessel. In 1993, t<strong>here</strong> were concerns that this activity may affect<br />
the behaviour and distribution of these wild dolphins, t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e a research<br />
project was initiated later that year by the University of Auckland. Initial<br />
research focused on common and bottlenose dolphins but it was shown<br />
that, as the industry was growing, the bottlenose were the most vulnerable<br />
of the two species. T<strong>here</strong> were differences in dolphin behaviour around<br />
tour-vessels and dolphin response to swim-with dolphin activities differed<br />
by swimmer placement. These short-term response studies are common<br />
in this field as they often fulfill the time-frame required by conservation<br />
managers. With long-lived, slow-breeding species, like whales and dolphins,<br />
long-term studies are required to understand the population level effects of<br />
human disturbance. With this in mind a detailed study focusing on the<br />
bottlenose dolphin population size, habitat use and responses to vessels<br />
and swimmers continued from 1996-2000 and we found considerable<br />
changes in dolphin behaviour, specifically around tour-vessels and when<br />
vessel number increased. We found the dolphins had become sensitised<br />
to swimmer placement and would not rest when dolphin-watch vessels<br />
were present; this was of concern as the industry had developed rapidly<br />
since tourism impact research started in 1994. Changes were made to the<br />
operators\’ permits allowing only the least invasive swimmer placement,<br />
limiting the amount of time spent with dolphins and a break during the<br />
day when boats were not allowed to interact with dolphins. In addition a<br />
moratorium was put in place to stop further development of the industry.<br />
But further research found the number of bottlenose dolphins frequenting<br />
the Bay had declined and they had drastically changed their habitat use<br />
within the Bay meaning new exclusion zones were ineffective. The cause<br />
of this decline and change in habitat use is currently unknown, but with<br />
long-term impacts showing displacement and decline in reproductive<br />
success in other populations, these possibilities cannot be ignored. T<strong>here</strong><br />
are considerable challenges <strong>for</strong> scientists studying the effects of tourism<br />
on already impacted populations, especially with dynamic marine species<br />
such as dolphins. The requirement to protect the animals, gather reliable<br />
data on the population and still protect the interests of industry provides<br />
challenges <strong>for</strong> managers. In the Bay of Islands, they have tried to manage<br />
all these needs with varying success. Our experience suggests other regions<br />
considering the development of dolphin-watch tourism should make sure<br />
pre-tourism data are collected and then the decision as to whether this <strong>for</strong>m<br />
of tourism be allowed should be made after understanding the population.<br />
This will minimise conflicting needs and protect the animals’ welfare, which<br />
should be <strong>for</strong>emost <strong>for</strong> all nature-based tourism activities.<br />
2011-12-07 17:15 <strong>Conservation</strong> in rural-amenity landscapes: socialecological<br />
interactions shaping private land conservation practice<br />
Cooke, BR*, RMIT University;<br />
Rural landscapes in many parts of the world are becoming increasingly<br />
multifunctional through lifestyle-orientated migration into regions once<br />
the domain of productive agriculture. While research has highlighted<br />
the increasing heterogeneity of rural land use, little is known about the<br />
conservation management actions (or absence of action) of new rural<br />
landholders. Insights into landholder actions in this context are critical,<br />
given ef<strong>for</strong>ts to address ecosystem fragmentation. This research explored<br />
the conservation practices of landholders in the hinterland regions of<br />
Melbourne, Australia, through an ethnographic methodology of in-depth<br />
interviews and participant observation. Land management practice proved<br />
intimately bound up with personal landscape interactions. Trial and<br />
error practices and observations of ecosystem function proved pivotal in<br />
in<strong>for</strong>ming either active or passive management philosophies. The legacy<br />
of past agricultural uses also framed notions of ecosystem resilience or<br />
fragility. Social networks of shared practice were less likely to be ‘across the<br />
fence’ relationships with neighbours observed in productive landscapes. A<br />
desire to own rural ‘space’ bounded conservation knowledge and action<br />
at the property scale, yet practices were sporadically shared through social<br />
networks. Conceptualising new rural landscapes as a social-ecological<br />
mosaic of property-scale practices may assist government ef<strong>for</strong>ts to engage<br />
landholders and achieve landscape scale objectives.<br />
2011-12-06 17:00 <strong>Conservation</strong> genetics of Malleefowl (Leipoa<br />
ocellata)<br />
Cope, T.M*, University of Melbourne; Mulder, R, University<br />
of Melbourne; Dunn, P, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee;<br />
Donnellan, S, South Australian Museum;<br />
Extensive land clearance in Australia over the past 100 years has led to<br />
wide scale fragmentation of mallee habitat. The Malleefowl is an Australian<br />
endemic Megapode which has suffered up to 50% reduction in range<br />
over the past 25 years. It is considered threatened or endangered in each<br />
occurring state in Australia. This study aimed to document genetic variation<br />
in Malleefowl and to determine appropriate management actions. Results<br />
of genetic variation across the range of Malleefowl show a very shallow<br />
haplotype network, suggesting recent range expansion from a historical<br />
bottleneck. In addition, we found no population structure or isolation by<br />
distance throughout the entire continent of Australia. This suggests that<br />
insufficient time since rapid population expansion has resulted in absence<br />
31