28.10.2014 Views

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />

Because rock lobsters (RL) are one of the most valuable commercial species<br />

in New Zealand (NZ) their stock assessment and protection are important.<br />

Although NZ’s marine reserves (MRs) are created <strong>for</strong> conducting scientific<br />

research, w<strong>here</strong> human-induced disturbance is minimised, they are<br />

indirectly protecting many populations of commercially species, including<br />

RL. In this study, we investigated MR effectiveness in the Wellington region<br />

by comparing RL population sizes inside and outside two MRs, of different<br />

ages. The study was conducted at the Taputeranga MR (TMR), established in<br />

2008, and the Kapiti MR (KMR), established in 1992. By using commercial<br />

craypots each MR was sampled inside its boundaries, at the boundaries, and<br />

outside the MR to calculate the CPUE <strong>for</strong> 2010 to 2011. RL size and weight<br />

inside and outside the Taputeranga MR were similar. However, CPUE was<br />

markedly higher inside TMR compared with sites outside and t<strong>here</strong> was a<br />

dramatic decrease with increasing distance from the centre of TMR. Kapiti<br />

MR did not show differences in CPUE inside and outside the boundary,<br />

despite the reserve being much older. However, we found larger sizes and<br />

greater weights of RL at KMR than at TMR. The higher CPUE results in<br />

TMR suggest that it is responding positively and rapidly to the protection<br />

during the early years of its establishment. We suggest that the low CPUE<br />

at the boundaries and outside the TMR could be explained by high levels of<br />

fishing pressure, and areas outside KMR are difficult <strong>for</strong> the public to access.<br />

2011-12-07 16:45 Modeling range boundaries of birds and butterflies<br />

to test effects of climate-change<br />

Roll, U.*, Tel-Aviv University; Stone, L., Tel-Aviv University; Solow,<br />

A., Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution;<br />

Many studies show poleward shifts of ranges as a consequence of global<br />

warming. However, many of works treat edges of distributions arbitrarily.<br />

This fails to account <strong>for</strong> the fact that our observations are merely a sample<br />

of species’ true distributions. We aimed at <strong>for</strong>mally modeling the edges of<br />

a spatial distribution along a north-south axis using a flexible parametric<br />

model. The model estimates a spatial distribution based on presence/<br />

absence grid-cell data; the distribution’s parameters were estimated using an<br />

optimization procedure. Likelihood ratios were used to conduct a statistical<br />

test between the null -no shift in range between two time frames - and<br />

alternative -possible shift in range. We first tested the model on simulated<br />

data and then applied it to data on British bird and butterfly distributions<br />

in two time frames. Most species did not show a significant change in their<br />

edges; those that did were not more supportive of the predictions of global<br />

warning than the converse. We t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e conclude that our method does not<br />

support the notion of climate induced directional range shifts. This work<br />

emphasizes the importance of carefully <strong>for</strong>mulated statistical models when<br />

estimating distributions of organisms in space, as <strong>for</strong> example, is needed<br />

in testing the effects of climate change. Effects of global climate change<br />

can be more complex than previously recognized and affect species ranges<br />

differently from what would be expected by mean annual temperature alone.<br />

2011-12-06 10:45 The conservation management of the kakapo:<br />

Flogging a dead parrot?<br />

Ron Moorhouse*, Department of <strong>Conservation</strong>; Daryl Eason,<br />

Department of <strong>Conservation</strong>; Jo Ledington, Department of<br />

<strong>Conservation</strong>; Graeme Elliott, Department of <strong>Conservation</strong>; Deidre<br />

Vercoe, Department of <strong>Conservation</strong>;<br />

The kakapo is a flightless, ground nesting parrot endemic to New Zealand.<br />

Widespread and abundant be<strong>for</strong>e human colonisation, habitat loss and the<br />

introduction of a variety of mammalian predators drove the kakapo to the<br />

brink of extinction. In 1995 just 51 kakapo were known to survive, all on<br />

offshore island sanctuaries with a total area of just 5,000 ha. A programme of<br />

intensive management implemented in 1995 successfully has resulted in the<br />

population more than doubling to reach 120 birds. Management included<br />

the strategic concentration of females on islands w<strong>here</strong> the right conditions<br />

<strong>for</strong> breeding were present, intensive managment of nests and, more recently,<br />

the use of artificial insemination and DNA fingerprinting to improve<br />

hatching success and the genetic health of the population. Young birds<br />

hatched on offshore island sanctuaries now outnumber the original founders<br />

rescued from Stewart Island and are expected to live <strong>for</strong> 80 years or more.<br />

The implementation of stoat control programmes on Resolution (20,000<br />

ha) and Secretary (8,140) Islands in Fiordland have the potential to reclaim<br />

sufficient habitat <strong>for</strong> several thousand kakapo. Despite its small population<br />

size, the kakapo’s adaptability, extreme longevity and “management friendly”<br />

characteristics suggest that its prospects <strong>for</strong> survival are good.<br />

2011-12-09 14:30 The current and future distribution of mammalian<br />

habitat<br />

Rondinini, C, Global Mammal Assessment program, Department<br />

of <strong>Biology</strong> and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome; Di<br />

Marco, M*, Global Mammal Assessment program, Department of<br />

<strong>Biology</strong> and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome; Visconti,<br />

P, Global Mammal Assessment program, Department of <strong>Biology</strong><br />

and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome; Boitani, L,<br />

Global Mammal Assessment program, Department of <strong>Biology</strong> and<br />

Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome;<br />

Habitat destruction is the primary cause of decline in mammals globally,<br />

t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e accurate knowledge of the distribution of mammalian habitat is<br />

paramount <strong>for</strong> effective conservation. We assess the geography and extent<br />

of current and projected future suitable habitat <strong>for</strong> terrestrial mammals.<br />

We use the in<strong>for</strong>mation from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species<br />

as a baseline <strong>for</strong> developing current and projected future habitat suitability<br />

models <strong>for</strong> 5027 out of 5330 known terrestrial mammal species, based on<br />

their habitat relationships in terms of land cover, elevation and hydrological<br />

features. Models are limited to within species’ known geographic ranges, and<br />

developed at a resolution of 300 m (current) and 10 km (projected future,<br />

based on four global scenarios of human development). Current habitat<br />

suitability models suggest that habitat availability limits the distribution of<br />

mammals especially in tropical and subtropical regions in South America,<br />

Africa and Southeast Asia that are not covered by dense <strong>for</strong>est. Projected<br />

future habitat suitability models identify the countries most affected by<br />

habitat loss by 2050, assuming that no additional conservation actions other<br />

than those described in the scenarios take place. With some exceptions,<br />

most of the countries with the largest predicted losses of suitable habitat<br />

<strong>for</strong> mammals are in Africa, North and South America, and central Asia.<br />

These results suggest that current and future habitat constraints to mammal<br />

distributions overlap only partially, t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e the spatial priorities of reactive<br />

and proactive conservation ef<strong>for</strong>ts may differ significantly.<br />

2011-12-08 14:15 Tolerance or Translocation: How Best to Ensure the<br />

Genetic Diversity of Leopard in southern Africa?<br />

Ropiquet, A*, University of Stellenbosch; Born, C, University of<br />

Stellenbosch; Matthee, CA, University of Stellenbosch; Knight, AT,<br />

University of Stellenbosch;<br />

The leopard (Panthera pardus) is a severely persecuted carnivore in areas<br />

w<strong>here</strong> it predates livestock and threatens human well-being. To resolve<br />

human-leopard conflict, conservation programs often employ translocation<br />

strategies of problem animals. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, these interventions are rarely<br />

in<strong>for</strong>med by genetic knowledge. Designed in the absence of genetic data,<br />

translocations may unintentionally compromise the genetic diversity, and<br />

hence the long-term viability, of the species. Analysis of fine scale genetic data<br />

derived from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA confirm that the Southern<br />

African leopards comprise a single population and indicates that the primary<br />

natural process shaping the spatial genetic structure of this population is<br />

isolation-by-distance. Based on this finding, the effective gene dispersal (σ)<br />

index is proposed to empower conservation agencies to apply evidence-based<br />

management by providing a maximum translocation distance. This finding<br />

highlights the importance of adopting a strategy coupling genetic data with<br />

social learning of land managers.<br />

2011-12-08 18:30 Are the Brazilian <strong>Conservation</strong> Units effective in<br />

protecting endangered species of the genus Callicebus (PRIMATES;<br />

PITHECIIDAE)?<br />

ROSÁRIO, NA*, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade<br />

Estadual de Santa Cruz; ASSUNÇÃO, AC, Departamento de Ciências<br />

Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz; CAMPIOLO, S,<br />

Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa<br />

Cruz;<br />

Callicebus coimbrai, Callicebus melanochir e Callicebus barbarabrownae<br />

occur in southeastern and northeastern Brazil and are appointed by the<br />

IUCN as endangered species. In this study we generated models of potential<br />

distribution <strong>for</strong> these three species to verify whether these are in locations<br />

protected by the Brazilian System of <strong>Conservation</strong> Units (SNUC). To<br />

model the potential distribution, we use the algorithm Maxent, GARP<br />

and the Bioclim from 19 climate variables. Then, the distribution maps<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!