Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
Because rock lobsters (RL) are one of the most valuable commercial species<br />
in New Zealand (NZ) their stock assessment and protection are important.<br />
Although NZ’s marine reserves (MRs) are created <strong>for</strong> conducting scientific<br />
research, w<strong>here</strong> human-induced disturbance is minimised, they are<br />
indirectly protecting many populations of commercially species, including<br />
RL. In this study, we investigated MR effectiveness in the Wellington region<br />
by comparing RL population sizes inside and outside two MRs, of different<br />
ages. The study was conducted at the Taputeranga MR (TMR), established in<br />
2008, and the Kapiti MR (KMR), established in 1992. By using commercial<br />
craypots each MR was sampled inside its boundaries, at the boundaries, and<br />
outside the MR to calculate the CPUE <strong>for</strong> 2010 to 2011. RL size and weight<br />
inside and outside the Taputeranga MR were similar. However, CPUE was<br />
markedly higher inside TMR compared with sites outside and t<strong>here</strong> was a<br />
dramatic decrease with increasing distance from the centre of TMR. Kapiti<br />
MR did not show differences in CPUE inside and outside the boundary,<br />
despite the reserve being much older. However, we found larger sizes and<br />
greater weights of RL at KMR than at TMR. The higher CPUE results in<br />
TMR suggest that it is responding positively and rapidly to the protection<br />
during the early years of its establishment. We suggest that the low CPUE<br />
at the boundaries and outside the TMR could be explained by high levels of<br />
fishing pressure, and areas outside KMR are difficult <strong>for</strong> the public to access.<br />
2011-12-07 16:45 Modeling range boundaries of birds and butterflies<br />
to test effects of climate-change<br />
Roll, U.*, Tel-Aviv University; Stone, L., Tel-Aviv University; Solow,<br />
A., Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution;<br />
Many studies show poleward shifts of ranges as a consequence of global<br />
warming. However, many of works treat edges of distributions arbitrarily.<br />
This fails to account <strong>for</strong> the fact that our observations are merely a sample<br />
of species’ true distributions. We aimed at <strong>for</strong>mally modeling the edges of<br />
a spatial distribution along a north-south axis using a flexible parametric<br />
model. The model estimates a spatial distribution based on presence/<br />
absence grid-cell data; the distribution’s parameters were estimated using an<br />
optimization procedure. Likelihood ratios were used to conduct a statistical<br />
test between the null -no shift in range between two time frames - and<br />
alternative -possible shift in range. We first tested the model on simulated<br />
data and then applied it to data on British bird and butterfly distributions<br />
in two time frames. Most species did not show a significant change in their<br />
edges; those that did were not more supportive of the predictions of global<br />
warning than the converse. We t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e conclude that our method does not<br />
support the notion of climate induced directional range shifts. This work<br />
emphasizes the importance of carefully <strong>for</strong>mulated statistical models when<br />
estimating distributions of organisms in space, as <strong>for</strong> example, is needed<br />
in testing the effects of climate change. Effects of global climate change<br />
can be more complex than previously recognized and affect species ranges<br />
differently from what would be expected by mean annual temperature alone.<br />
2011-12-06 10:45 The conservation management of the kakapo:<br />
Flogging a dead parrot?<br />
Ron Moorhouse*, Department of <strong>Conservation</strong>; Daryl Eason,<br />
Department of <strong>Conservation</strong>; Jo Ledington, Department of<br />
<strong>Conservation</strong>; Graeme Elliott, Department of <strong>Conservation</strong>; Deidre<br />
Vercoe, Department of <strong>Conservation</strong>;<br />
The kakapo is a flightless, ground nesting parrot endemic to New Zealand.<br />
Widespread and abundant be<strong>for</strong>e human colonisation, habitat loss and the<br />
introduction of a variety of mammalian predators drove the kakapo to the<br />
brink of extinction. In 1995 just 51 kakapo were known to survive, all on<br />
offshore island sanctuaries with a total area of just 5,000 ha. A programme of<br />
intensive management implemented in 1995 successfully has resulted in the<br />
population more than doubling to reach 120 birds. Management included<br />
the strategic concentration of females on islands w<strong>here</strong> the right conditions<br />
<strong>for</strong> breeding were present, intensive managment of nests and, more recently,<br />
the use of artificial insemination and DNA fingerprinting to improve<br />
hatching success and the genetic health of the population. Young birds<br />
hatched on offshore island sanctuaries now outnumber the original founders<br />
rescued from Stewart Island and are expected to live <strong>for</strong> 80 years or more.<br />
The implementation of stoat control programmes on Resolution (20,000<br />
ha) and Secretary (8,140) Islands in Fiordland have the potential to reclaim<br />
sufficient habitat <strong>for</strong> several thousand kakapo. Despite its small population<br />
size, the kakapo’s adaptability, extreme longevity and “management friendly”<br />
characteristics suggest that its prospects <strong>for</strong> survival are good.<br />
2011-12-09 14:30 The current and future distribution of mammalian<br />
habitat<br />
Rondinini, C, Global Mammal Assessment program, Department<br />
of <strong>Biology</strong> and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome; Di<br />
Marco, M*, Global Mammal Assessment program, Department of<br />
<strong>Biology</strong> and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome; Visconti,<br />
P, Global Mammal Assessment program, Department of <strong>Biology</strong><br />
and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome; Boitani, L,<br />
Global Mammal Assessment program, Department of <strong>Biology</strong> and<br />
Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome;<br />
Habitat destruction is the primary cause of decline in mammals globally,<br />
t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e accurate knowledge of the distribution of mammalian habitat is<br />
paramount <strong>for</strong> effective conservation. We assess the geography and extent<br />
of current and projected future suitable habitat <strong>for</strong> terrestrial mammals.<br />
We use the in<strong>for</strong>mation from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species<br />
as a baseline <strong>for</strong> developing current and projected future habitat suitability<br />
models <strong>for</strong> 5027 out of 5330 known terrestrial mammal species, based on<br />
their habitat relationships in terms of land cover, elevation and hydrological<br />
features. Models are limited to within species’ known geographic ranges, and<br />
developed at a resolution of 300 m (current) and 10 km (projected future,<br />
based on four global scenarios of human development). Current habitat<br />
suitability models suggest that habitat availability limits the distribution of<br />
mammals especially in tropical and subtropical regions in South America,<br />
Africa and Southeast Asia that are not covered by dense <strong>for</strong>est. Projected<br />
future habitat suitability models identify the countries most affected by<br />
habitat loss by 2050, assuming that no additional conservation actions other<br />
than those described in the scenarios take place. With some exceptions,<br />
most of the countries with the largest predicted losses of suitable habitat<br />
<strong>for</strong> mammals are in Africa, North and South America, and central Asia.<br />
These results suggest that current and future habitat constraints to mammal<br />
distributions overlap only partially, t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e the spatial priorities of reactive<br />
and proactive conservation ef<strong>for</strong>ts may differ significantly.<br />
2011-12-08 14:15 Tolerance or Translocation: How Best to Ensure the<br />
Genetic Diversity of Leopard in southern Africa?<br />
Ropiquet, A*, University of Stellenbosch; Born, C, University of<br />
Stellenbosch; Matthee, CA, University of Stellenbosch; Knight, AT,<br />
University of Stellenbosch;<br />
The leopard (Panthera pardus) is a severely persecuted carnivore in areas<br />
w<strong>here</strong> it predates livestock and threatens human well-being. To resolve<br />
human-leopard conflict, conservation programs often employ translocation<br />
strategies of problem animals. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, these interventions are rarely<br />
in<strong>for</strong>med by genetic knowledge. Designed in the absence of genetic data,<br />
translocations may unintentionally compromise the genetic diversity, and<br />
hence the long-term viability, of the species. Analysis of fine scale genetic data<br />
derived from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA confirm that the Southern<br />
African leopards comprise a single population and indicates that the primary<br />
natural process shaping the spatial genetic structure of this population is<br />
isolation-by-distance. Based on this finding, the effective gene dispersal (σ)<br />
index is proposed to empower conservation agencies to apply evidence-based<br />
management by providing a maximum translocation distance. This finding<br />
highlights the importance of adopting a strategy coupling genetic data with<br />
social learning of land managers.<br />
2011-12-08 18:30 Are the Brazilian <strong>Conservation</strong> Units effective in<br />
protecting endangered species of the genus Callicebus (PRIMATES;<br />
PITHECIIDAE)?<br />
ROSÁRIO, NA*, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade<br />
Estadual de Santa Cruz; ASSUNÇÃO, AC, Departamento de Ciências<br />
Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz; CAMPIOLO, S,<br />
Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa<br />
Cruz;<br />
Callicebus coimbrai, Callicebus melanochir e Callicebus barbarabrownae<br />
occur in southeastern and northeastern Brazil and are appointed by the<br />
IUCN as endangered species. In this study we generated models of potential<br />
distribution <strong>for</strong> these three species to verify whether these are in locations<br />
protected by the Brazilian System of <strong>Conservation</strong> Units (SNUC). To<br />
model the potential distribution, we use the algorithm Maxent, GARP<br />
and the Bioclim from 19 climate variables. Then, the distribution maps<br />
142