28.10.2014 Views

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />

suggest that a return to a more scientifically rigorous approach is now<br />

warranted. We t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e suggest a paradigm-shift by revisiting but also<br />

further developing a three-component approach to biodiversity-assessment<br />

originally put <strong>for</strong>ward more than two decades ago by Noss (1990, Conserv.<br />

Biol. 4(4):355-364). This reworked framework comprehensively evaluates<br />

three components of biodiversity (function, structure, and composition;<br />

or biodiversity processes, patterns, and species, respectively) and remains<br />

scientifically rigorous by accounting <strong>for</strong> the ecological and biophysical<br />

mechanisms that drive the status of components and by targeting specific<br />

biodiversity processes and patterns.<br />

attacks and disease. The results show that constraints limit the ability of<br />

achieving a certain target population growth rate. However, the overall<br />

management strategy <strong>for</strong> investing in various management actions remains<br />

the same. For low target population growth rate, the optimal strategy is to<br />

invest predominantly in reducing vehicle collisions and dog attacks. For<br />

high target population growth rate, a substantial investment in habitat<br />

restoration is required. This framework is important in planning the<br />

recovery of declining species exposed to multiple threats that is becoming<br />

critically important <strong>for</strong> many species.<br />

2011-12-08 18:30 Co-Management Approach <strong>for</strong> Pygmy Seahorse<br />

<strong>Conservation</strong>: A Case Study <strong>for</strong> Recreational Diving Industry in<br />

Semporna, Malaysia<br />

Choo, C.K.*, Department of Marine Science, Universiti Malaysia<br />

Terengganu; Yeong, Y.L., Department of Marine Science, Universiti<br />

Malaysia Terengganu; Orosco, C.O., Department of Marine Science,<br />

Universiti Malaysia Terengganu; Maidin, N., nasrulhm@gmail.com;<br />

Two species of pygmy seahorses (Hippocampus bargibanti and H. denise)<br />

were popular attractions among divers in the Semporna waters, Sabah.<br />

However, a consultation workshop involving multiple stakeholders (dive<br />

guides, dive center managers, professional underwater photographer,<br />

resource managers, NGOs and researchers) revealed that intense<br />

photography flashlight, direct physical disturbance to, and relocation<br />

of, pygmy seahorses and seafan hosts, had threatened the populations.<br />

Through an iterative process of selection, the stakeholders developed<br />

management protocols <strong>for</strong> pygmy seahorses by identifying threats to<br />

pygmy seahorses and suggested the corresponding management options.<br />

Nine management protocols were established following an open discussion<br />

on the tangibility of implementation strategy. These are: 1) improved<br />

education and awareness among divers, 2) prohibition on touching pygmy<br />

seahorse and seafan, 3) prohibition of novice divers from visiting pygmy<br />

seahorse site, 4) prohibition on the use of octopus as a searching technique,<br />

5) improved en<strong>for</strong>cement, 6) imposing quota on the number of divers, 7)<br />

minimizing the use of flashlight and reducing flashlight intensity, 8) using<br />

magnifying glass as a viewing tool, and 9) facilitate coordination among<br />

dive centers through self-regulatory practice. The management protocols<br />

were subsequently translated into poster materials distributed at each dive<br />

centers. An assessment of the effectiveness of the developed protocols is<br />

necessary and should be supplemented by adaptive management plans.<br />

2011-12-09 12:00 Accounting <strong>for</strong> constraints in optimal resource<br />

allocation <strong>for</strong> mitigating multiple threats<br />

Chooi Fei Ng*, The University of Queensland, School of Mathematics,<br />

Brisbane, Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia; Hugh P. Possingham,<br />

The University of Queensland, The Ecology Center, Brisbane, QLD<br />

4072, Australia; Deidré L. de Villiers, Queensland Department of<br />

Environment and Resource Management, P. O. Box 15155, City East,<br />

QLD 4000, Australia; , Harriet J. Preece, Queensland Department<br />

of Environment and Resource Management, P. O. Box 15155, City<br />

East, QLD 4000, Australia; Clive A. McAlpine, The University of<br />

Queensland, Center <strong>for</strong> Spatial Environmental Research, School<br />

of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, Brisbane,<br />

QLD 4072, Australia; Jonathan R. Rhodes, The University of<br />

Queensland, Center <strong>for</strong> Spatial Environmental Research, School<br />

of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, Brisbane,<br />

QLD 4072, Australia;<br />

Finding cost-effective management strategies <strong>for</strong> the recovery of species<br />

declining due to multiple threats is a major challenge <strong>for</strong> decision makers<br />

with the limited resources <strong>available</strong>. Although the implications of costs<br />

among multiple conservation actions were reasonably well understood,<br />

the consequences of multiple constraints and opportunities are unknown.<br />

By integrating the population growth rate with return on investment<br />

curves that take into account of multiple constraints in a decision theory<br />

framework, we examine how these constraints affect the optimal allocation<br />

of resources among various conservation actions. We demonstrated this<br />

using a rapidly declining koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) population in<br />

eastern Australia that is threatened by habitat loss, vehicle collisions, dog<br />

2011-12-08 18:30 Habitat selection of the endangered Hawaiian<br />

goose: a multi-scale approach<br />

Christina Cornett*, Tropical <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> & Environmental<br />

Science, University of Hawai`i, Hilo; Steven C. Hess, Pacific Island<br />

Ecosystems Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Kīlauea Field<br />

Station, Hawai`i National Park, HI;<br />

While much is known about the endangered Hawaiian goose or Nēnē<br />

(Branta sandvicensis) during the breeding season, very little is understood<br />

about movements and habitat use in the non-breeding season. This habitat<br />

selection study identifies preferred Nēnē habitats and how preference shifts<br />

seasonally. Because habitat selection modeling may yield different results<br />

when measured at different scales, we measured habitat characteristics at<br />

both broad and fine scales. In 2009-2010, we outfitted eight Nēnē ganders<br />

on Hawai`i Island with 40-45 gram satellite transmitters. Nēnē accepted<br />

the transmitters and provided us with over 3,500 GPS locations in near<br />

real-time. Broad scale habitat modeling revealed that Nēnē prefer humanmodified<br />

landscapes during the breeding season and higher elevation<br />

locations dominated by native shrubland during the non-breeding season.<br />

Despite the lack of natural sources of standing water on Hawai`i Island<br />

and the terrestrial nature of Nēnē, all of our subjects have centered clusters<br />

of locations seasonally around water features, reflecting the notes of<br />

early naturalists. Two subjects revealed roosting areas within a subalpine<br />

shrubland known as Kīpuka Nēnē surrounded by rugged a`ā lava flows,<br />

w<strong>here</strong> Nēnē had not been observed since 1949. Hawai`i Island Nēnē appear<br />

to be recovering some traditional movement patterns lost during their<br />

severe population reduction of the 20th century.<br />

2011-12-06 16:45 Interacting effects between climate change and<br />

habitat loss on biodiversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis<br />

Chrystal S. Mantyka-Pringle*, University of Queensland, Centre<br />

<strong>for</strong> Spatial Environmental Research, School of Geography, Planning<br />

and Environmental Management, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia;<br />

University of Queensland, Australian Research Council Centre of<br />

Excellence <strong>for</strong> Environmental De; Tara G. Martin, University of<br />

Queensland, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence <strong>for</strong><br />

Environmental Decisions, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia; CSIRO<br />

Ecosystem Sciences, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia; Jonathan R.<br />

Rhodes, University of Queensland, Centre <strong>for</strong> Spatial Environmental<br />

Research, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental<br />

Management, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia; University of<br />

Queensland, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence <strong>for</strong><br />

Environmental De;<br />

One of the most pressing questions of the twenty-first-century in ecology<br />

and conservation is how do multiple stressors interact and cumulatively<br />

impact ecosystems and their biodiversity. In this paper we present a metaanalysis<br />

of studies that quantify the effect of habitat loss on biological<br />

populations and examine whether the magnitude of these effects depends<br />

on current climatic conditions and historical rates of climate change.<br />

The main findings are first, that climate change exacerbates the negative<br />

effects of habitat loss on species density and/or diversity. Second, the most<br />

important determinant of habitat loss and fragmentation effects, averaged<br />

across species and geographic regions, was max temperature, with mean<br />

precipitation change over the last 100 years of secondary importance.<br />

Fragmentation effects were greatest in areas with high temperatures.<br />

Conversely, fragmentation effects were lowest in areas w<strong>here</strong> average<br />

rainfall has increased over time. This is the first study to conduct a global<br />

analysis of existing data to quantify and test <strong>for</strong> interacting effects between<br />

climate and habitat loss on biological populations. Thus, our results<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!