28.10.2014 Views

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />

protect and apply science-based policies. We will discuss funding <strong>for</strong> expert<br />

witnesses, controls on misrepresentation of facts in government processes,<br />

scientific integrity procedures, and more. For example, to reveal the likely<br />

costs of legislative proposals US Budget Act of 1974 requires that be<strong>for</strong>e bills<br />

can be voted on by the full House or Senate they have to be accompanied by a<br />

budget estimate provided by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.<br />

Legislatures and Plenaries of Treaty Conferences could provide a process to<br />

support science in policy by requiring that the primary proposals on the<br />

agenda of a COP or in proposed authorizing legislation be accompanied by a<br />

majority (and if necessary, dissenting) analysis, citing peer-reviewed science,<br />

and by an independent published peer review of those explanations. The<br />

reviewers could be drawn, after checking <strong>for</strong> financial conflicts of interest,<br />

by the Congressional Research Service or IPBES respectively from rosters<br />

of experts provided by SCB and other professional societies. The scientific<br />

basis <strong>for</strong> the final decision could be subject to judicial or IPBES review as<br />

well.<br />

2011-12-07 15:00 International Treaties, IPBES, and Domestic Policies<br />

in Protecting and Restoring Forests (and Paying Forest Experts)<br />

John Fitzgerald*, SCB ; Jonsson Bengt-Gunnar, SCB-IPBES Task<br />

Force & MIU, Sweden;<br />

The nations of the earth have recognized in several nearly universally ratified<br />

treaties that sustaining the biological diversity and quality of <strong>for</strong>ests is<br />

necessary <strong>for</strong> sustaining life as we know it. The Convention on Biological<br />

Diversity goes even further and instructs nations that are party to it to<br />

restore degraded ecosystems. We will explore innovative ways to empower<br />

and fulfill these general obligations using the science of <strong>for</strong>est conservation<br />

and restoration through market and non-market mechanisms. In reviewing<br />

key treaty provisions and their domestic law counterparts, we will describe<br />

powerful tools to produce investment and procurement decisions that<br />

restore <strong>for</strong>ests. We will review effective policies <strong>for</strong> taxes, penalties, fines,<br />

tariffs, and embargoes that work together to restore <strong>for</strong>ests’ function and<br />

coverage and protect people at the same time. We will discuss the limited<br />

role that offsets can play. Several nations and the EU are en<strong>for</strong>cing strong<br />

laws that go beyond parks and protect certain <strong>for</strong>ests <strong>for</strong> the sake of the<br />

functions they provide even while they allow sustainable uses of those<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests. The US and the EU have banned the importation of illegally<br />

harvested wood or other <strong>for</strong>est products. The question then is, what does<br />

it mean to be legally harvested? If a permit is issued by a country that has<br />

not fulfilled its treaty obligations with respect to that tree or <strong>for</strong>est, is it a<br />

legitimate permit? What is the balance between Greenhouse Gas emissions<br />

and ecosystem sequestration that is sustainable and what kind of earth can<br />

we sustain? The IPBES and other bodies can help answer these questions in<br />

a powerful way if we adopt procedures that reject policy decisions that are<br />

neither precautionary nor based on the best <strong>available</strong> science.<br />

2011-12-06 16:42 Near real-time monitoring systems <strong>for</strong> de<strong>for</strong>estation,<br />

illegal logging, and fire<br />

John Musinsky*, <strong>Conservation</strong> International;<br />

The destruction and degradation of the world’s <strong>for</strong>ests from de<strong>for</strong>estation,<br />

illegal logging and fire has wide-ranging environmental and economic<br />

impacts, including biodiversity loss, the degradation of ecosystem services<br />

and the emission of greenhouse gases. In an ef<strong>for</strong>t to strengthen local capacity<br />

to respond to these threats, <strong>Conservation</strong> International has developed a suite<br />

of near real-time satellite monitoring systems generating daily alerts, maps<br />

and reports of <strong>for</strong>est fire, fire risk, de<strong>for</strong>estation and degradation that are<br />

used by national and sub-national government agencies, NGO’s, scientists,<br />

communities, and the media to respond to and report on threats to <strong>for</strong>est<br />

resources. Currently, the systems support more than 1000 subscribers from<br />

45 countries, focusing on Madagascar, Indonesia, Bolivia and Peru. This<br />

presentation will explore the types of innovative applications users have<br />

found <strong>for</strong> these data, challenges they’ve encountered in data acquisition and<br />

accuracy, and feedback they’ve given on the usefulness of these systems <strong>for</strong><br />

REDD+ implementation, protected areas management and improved <strong>for</strong>est<br />

governance.<br />

2011-12-07 14:20 Using systematic monitoring to evaluate and improve<br />

the management of a tiger reserve in northern Laos<br />

Johnson, Arlyne*, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Vongkhamheng,<br />

Chanthavy, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Saypanya, Santi, Wildlife<br />

<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Hansel, Troy, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>;<br />

Strindberg, Samantha, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>;<br />

Monitoring and evaluation is a key ingredient <strong>for</strong> improving effectiveness of<br />

conservation projects. However, t<strong>here</strong> are few actual examples of how this<br />

is successfully being done as part of an adaptive management cycle. From<br />

2003-2010, we monitored tigers and their prey, key threats to their longterm<br />

survival and our management interventions in the Nam Et-Phou Louey<br />

National Protected Area; the last known site <strong>for</strong> breeding tigers in Indochina.<br />

We used monitoring results to regularly evaluate and improve management<br />

interventions through several iterations of the project cycle. A baseline survey<br />

estimating 7-24 tigers within a 3,548km2 area was used to set a population<br />

target and define a 3,000 km2 totally protected zone. Identification of the<br />

main threats, including direct killing of tigers and overhunting of prey<br />

as well as contributing factors, led us to select two interventions – law<br />

en<strong>for</strong>cement and public outreach- to reduce threats. Spatial deployment of<br />

en<strong>for</strong>cement and outreach teams was based on biological monitoring results<br />

and changes in illegal hunting and public attitudes to evaluate effectiveness<br />

of management interventions and ensured appropriate refinement over time.<br />

Several enabling conditions made successful adaptive management possible<br />

including donor-support <strong>for</strong> monitoring, mandatory venues <strong>for</strong> reporting<br />

results, technical support to design monitoring systems, mentors and longterm<br />

support to build national capacity and guide application of the results.<br />

2011-12-07 15:00 Tanzania’s national inventory of wildlife corridors<br />

Jones*, T; Caro, T; Davenport, TRB;<br />

A critical conservation goal <strong>for</strong> the United Republic of Tanzania is to maintain<br />

its remaining wildlife corridors as this is seen as vital <strong>for</strong> maintaining its<br />

globally important wildlife populations. A nationwide assessment in 2009<br />

documented 31 remaining wildlife corridors in mainland Tanzania, of<br />

which 23 (74%) were categorised as in extreme or critical condition, defined<br />

as likely to disappear within an estimated five years. Now, two years on,<br />

we review the current conservation status of these 23 corridors, as well as<br />

development of new corridor policy and legislation. We present updated<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation from several of these corridors, including a case study in southcentral<br />

Tanzania showing that the two remaining corridors between the<br />

Udzungwa Mountains and the Selous Game Reserve, an important link<br />

between Tanzania’s major western and southern wildlife communities, have<br />

been completely blocked since 2007, with serious ecological and socioeconomic<br />

implications. Overall, our review suggests that 2009 predictions<br />

about the state of some of Tanzania’s wildlife corridors were valid. We provide<br />

recommendations <strong>for</strong> restoring connectivity, and discuss the prospects <strong>for</strong><br />

preventing further corridor losses across mainland Tanzania.<br />

2011-12-07 11:45 Disease management options <strong>for</strong> contagious cancer<br />

in Tasmanian devils<br />

Jones, M. E.*, University of Tasmania;<br />

Tasmanian devils are threatened with extinction from a novel contagious<br />

cancer. Since Devil Facial Tumour Disease was detected in 1996, species<br />

decline has exceeded 60%, with local declines of 95%. Contagious<br />

cancers, in which live tumours cells are the pathogenic agent, are rare in<br />

nature. Conditions <strong>for</strong> their emergence include low genetic diversity or<br />

immunosuppression, and intimate injurious contact. Having already lost<br />

half their genetic diversity, devils are the clearest case yet of the devastating<br />

consequences of low genetic diversity <strong>for</strong> the emergence of new diseases.<br />

Options <strong>for</strong> management of the devil and its tumour that will lead to<br />

the recovery of devil populations in the wild are limited. In the case of<br />

extinction in the wild, reintroduction could occur from an ex-situ insurance<br />

metapopulation of healthy devils managed <strong>for</strong> retention of a high level of<br />

remaining genetic diversity. Recent results indicate reduced population<br />

impacts and disease prevalence and possibly virulence as the tumour<br />

encounters a different host genetic subpopulation <strong>for</strong> the first time. Insitu<br />

management needs to be based on understanding of the evolutionary<br />

interaction between the tumour and its host. Genetic rescue, through<br />

mixing genetic subpopulations, would enhance the resilience of the species<br />

to this and future threats.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!