Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
2011-12-07 15:45 Territorial Competition and Landscape Ecology in<br />
Yellow Warblers (Dendroica petechia)<br />
OZELSKI, ASHLEY*, CUNY Graduate Center; Manne, Lisa,<br />
CUNY Graduate Center; Nott, Philip, The Institute <strong>for</strong> Bird<br />
Populations;<br />
At higher population densities, territorial birds may be distributed according<br />
to an ideal-despotic model, in which more competitive individuals occupy and<br />
secure the best territories. Since more competitive individuals often occupy<br />
larger territories and exclude others from the area, this may skew measures<br />
of habitat quality assessed via population density or occupancy. Here, we test<br />
the scales at which despotism can be detected in Yellow Warblers (Dendroica<br />
petechia) of the Midwest United States by utilizing <strong>available</strong> data from the<br />
Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) program. We<br />
characterized sites as competitive and non-competitive based on bird size<br />
and age parameters and tested <strong>for</strong> environmental differences between sites.<br />
Proportions of habitat differed significantly between competitive and noncompetitive<br />
sites; in many cases, more competitive individuals were found<br />
in landscapes with smaller proportions of suitable habitat. This supports the<br />
hypothesis that older, larger males occupy the best territories and exclude<br />
less competitive males when habitat types are limited. Future studies will<br />
determine if reproductive output also correlates with these detectable<br />
competitive site differences. Identifying how landscapes and social dynamics<br />
interact with reproductive success provides further insight on how land<br />
management decisions can be used to conserve territorial species.<br />
2011-12-07 12:15 Hunted Felids: Too Protected To Survive?<br />
Palazy, L, University Lyon, France; Bonenfant, C, University Lyon,<br />
France; Gaillard, J.-M., University Lyon, France; Courchamp, F*,<br />
CNRS - University Paris Sud, France;<br />
Trophy hunting is one of the most controversial issues in conservation<br />
biology. In particular, proponents and opponents debate fiercely over its<br />
innocuousness <strong>for</strong> hunted populations. Contrarily to common belief, trophy<br />
hunting concerns an outstanding economic market and a surprisingly high<br />
number of species. Focusing on felids, we show that trophy hunting could<br />
constitute an overlooked threat to threatened species. Because humans value<br />
rarity, protected species are disproportionately hunted, t<strong>here</strong>by become<br />
even more vulnerable, which risks pushing them to extinction. With the<br />
example of the ten different felids species that are hunted <strong>for</strong> their trophies,<br />
we evidence that (i) the number of killed individuals increase with time,<br />
in several cases exponentially, despite population declines, (ii) the price of<br />
trophies is strongly dependent on species protection status, (iii) changes of<br />
protection status result in counter-intuitive changes of hunting pressures:<br />
protection increase leads to exacerbated hunting ef<strong>for</strong>t, while protection<br />
relaxation generates relative disinterest; (iv) the increase of hunting observed<br />
<strong>for</strong> the last 40 years cannot go on indefinitely, as exemplified by our<br />
estimation of extinction times with simple mathematical models. The value<br />
of rarity in trophy-hunted species implies specific management requirements<br />
to avoid overexploitation if we are to sustainably use this recreational activity<br />
as an income source <strong>for</strong> conservation.<br />
2011-12-08 18:30 Motives and preferences <strong>for</strong> trophy hunting: who,<br />
why and which ones?<br />
Palazy, L.*, UMR CNRS 5558, Lab BBE, Université Lyon 1,<br />
VIlleurbanne, France ; Bonenfant, C., UMR CNRS 5558, Lab<br />
BBE, Université Lyon 1, VIlleurbanne, France ; Gaillard, J.M., UMR<br />
CNRS 5558, Lab BBE, Université Lyon 1, VIlleurbanne, France ;<br />
Courchamp, F., UMR CNRS 8079, Lab ESE, Université Paris-Sud,<br />
Orsay, France;<br />
Trophy hunting is of major relevance to conservation biology, both as a<br />
significant source of financial outcomes and as a potential threat to many<br />
species. T<strong>here</strong> are however several major gaps in our understanding of this<br />
considerable economic market. Notably, neither the motivations of hunters<br />
(either related personal satisfaction, social interests or conservation concern)<br />
nor the criteria driving species preferences are well understood. Until<br />
recently only the trophy size and animal body mass were allegedly driving<br />
the hunter’s choice of a species, but novel work highlighting species rarity<br />
as a key preference criteria has raised new conservation concerns <strong>for</strong> the<br />
biodiversity affected by this activity, supposing that hunters value species<br />
differently. Estimating the value given by hunters to various species is,<br />
however, difficult. The classically used trophy price is a good but indirect<br />
indicator of species attractiveness and can thus be biased. Considering<br />
those gaps and difficulties, we assessed the drivers of trophy hunting by<br />
interviewing trophy hunters directly. With an online questionnaire targeting<br />
the largest trophy-hunting club and trophy-hunting provider websites, we<br />
characterized the motivations <strong>for</strong> hunting, the preferred hunted species and<br />
the main criteria of choice <strong>for</strong> these species worldwide. Statistical analyses<br />
were then conducted to assess the link between trophy hunting and species<br />
threat.<br />
2011-12-07 10:30 Disrupted seasonality by dams drives population<br />
declines and range-wide losses of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia river-breeding frogs<br />
Palen, WJ*, Simon Fraser University; Kupferberg, SJ, University of<br />
Cali<strong>for</strong>nia-Berkeley; Lind, AJ, US Forest Service; Bobzien, S, East<br />
Bay Regional Parks; Catenazzi, A, Gonzaga University; Drennan, J,<br />
Garcia and Associates; Power, ME, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia-Berkeley;<br />
Alteration of natural hydrology by large dams combined with peak demands<br />
<strong>for</strong> power and water in summer have resulted in frequent aseasonal flow<br />
conditions in rivers of western North America. Native species in these<br />
ecosystems have evolved with predictable annual flood-drought cycles,<br />
and are vulnerable to disruption of the seasonal match between stable lowflow<br />
conditions and the timing of life history. Here we evaluate the impact<br />
of altered river flow regimes <strong>for</strong> a native frog in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia at four scales:<br />
changes in species distributions over the past half-century, differences in<br />
current population abundance between regulated and unregulated rivers,<br />
temporal trends among populations with different hydrologic histories, and<br />
annual patterns of survival with seasonal hydrology. Foothill Yellow-legged<br />
Frogs (Rana boylii) are absent downstream of large dams more often than<br />
in unregulated rivers, and breeding populations are 4-5 times smaller in<br />
regulated rivers. Time series data from five R. boylii populations across a<br />
gradient of natural to highly artificial conditions suggest that variability of<br />
flows in spring and summer result in high mortality of eggs and larvae. Both<br />
models and field data suggest that such mortality can cause populationlevel<br />
declines. Mitigation to stem biodiversity loss downstream of dams will<br />
benefit from management that better mimics the natural flow regime.<br />
2011-12-08 18:30 Effects of human and protected area impact on<br />
freshwater ecosystem services of Nepal<br />
Pandeya, B.*, King’s College London; Mulligan, M., King’s College<br />
London;<br />
We have assessed human influence and the protected area (PA) impact<br />
on freshwater ecosystem services (ES) of Nepal. The study has analysed<br />
the globally best data of bio-physical, environmental and socio-economic<br />
properties <strong>available</strong> at 1km and 1ha spatial resolution. We applied advance<br />
hydrological modelling tools that include Co$ting Nature tool and the<br />
WaterWorld-Policy Support System (WW-PSS) to assess the quality and<br />
quantity of freshwater ES. With the exception of PA catchments, increased<br />
human footprint on freshwater ES is clearly noticed across the country.<br />
However, low to minimal impact on freshwater ES is seen within, and<br />
immediate downstream of, the PA catchments. The PA catchments are<br />
supplying nearly 100% filtered freshwater. The re<strong>for</strong>estation and improved<br />
management of PA catchments have resulted in better quality of freshwater<br />
supply, although the water availability is slightly diminished because of<br />
increased evapotranspiration ratio of the catchments. The research concludes<br />
that the PA catchments are the major source of improved freshwater ES in<br />
the region. Thus, the freshwater ES of PA catchments must be understood<br />
<strong>for</strong> their primary role in providing better quality of freshwater supply to<br />
people within the PA catchments and their immediate downstream areas.<br />
2011-12-06 14:00 Patterns of local resource use by the Waorani in<br />
Yasuní National Park, Amazonian Ecuador<br />
Papworth, SK*, Imperial College London; Slocombe, K, University<br />
of York; Bunnefeld, N, Imperial College London; Milner-Gulland,<br />
EJ, Imperial College London;<br />
Mapping resource use is important in conservation <strong>for</strong> the development<br />
of appropriate no-take areas or reserves, defining land ownership and<br />
measuring extraction sustainability. Mapping resource use often involves<br />
one of two approaches: interviews and drawn maps, or researchers<br />
accompanying individuals, either while they are extracting or afterwards.<br />
124