Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
Species distribution models (SDMs) are commonly used <strong>for</strong> making<br />
predictions about the impacts of threatening processes, such as climate<br />
change, on species’ distributions. These models are typically correlative,<br />
identifying determinants of species occurrence by finding statistical<br />
associations between occurrence localities and environmental characteristics.<br />
However, although practical and widely adopted, this approach suffers<br />
from a range of uncertainties that emerge from subjective judgements<br />
made throughout the modelling process. Two key sources of subjective<br />
uncertainty lie in the choice of relevant environmental covariates, and in<br />
the treatment of habitat components critical to the species’ persistence (e.g.<br />
geological features). The present research investigates the consequences of<br />
these subjective decisions on the outcomes of species distribution modelling<br />
through a case study of an alpine specialist, the endangered Australian<br />
mountain pygmy-possum, Burramys parvus. The Maxent algorithm was<br />
used to develop a range of SDMs <strong>for</strong> this species, each of which incorporated<br />
a unique subset of ecologically-relevant environmental correlates <strong>for</strong> habitat<br />
suitability, as well as alternative methods <strong>for</strong> representing the influence of<br />
boulderfields on the suitability of habitat <strong>for</strong> pygmy-possums. This study<br />
highlights the uncertainties arising from subjective modelling choices when<br />
predicting the impacts of climate change on biodiversity.<br />
2011-12-07 14:30 Cost-effective habitat management strategies <strong>for</strong><br />
White-backed Woodpecker recovery in Sweden<br />
Baxter, PWJ*, The University of Queensland; Possingham, HP,<br />
The University of Queensland; Gren, I-M, Swedish Agricultural<br />
University; McCarthy, MA, The University of Melbourne;<br />
Mikusiński, G, Swedish Agricultural University;<br />
The White-backed Woodpecker (WBW; Dendrocopos leucotos) is<br />
widespread in Eurasia but critically endangered in Sweden, rapidly<br />
declining in numbers throughout the last century. The resultant concern<br />
has led to considerable planning and investment in its recovery. Managers<br />
involved in the WBW Action Plan have identified sites with the greatest<br />
potential <strong>for</strong> woodpecker habitat restoration. These include areas that are<br />
largely protected and already provide suitable habitat, and managed <strong>for</strong>ests<br />
likely to provide such habitat in future. We modelled woodpecker-oriented<br />
management of these <strong>for</strong>est areas and the resultant WBW population, using<br />
an optimisation approach to identify cost-effective strategies that attain a<br />
sustainable WBW population by 2070. Sites selected by managers differ<br />
in their contribution to WBW habitat and recovery, however, and t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e<br />
different approaches to site identification and management can further<br />
reduce costs. Further analyses at coarser and finer spatial scales highlight the<br />
effect of spatial resolution on identifying efficient conservation strategies.<br />
2011-12-06 12:15 Mechanisms of Accelerated Human Population<br />
Growth at Protected Area Edges<br />
Bean, WT, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Berkeley; Burton, AC, Alberta<br />
Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; Brashares, JS*, University of<br />
Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Berkeley; Wittemyer, G, Colorado State University;<br />
For more than a century, protected areas (PAs) have served as the default<br />
mechanism <strong>for</strong> conservation. However, commentators have long argued<br />
that the costs of PA creation are borne disproportionately by disenfranchised<br />
local communities. Recent work has suggested that, despite potential costs<br />
of living on the edge of PAs, rural human population growth in Africa<br />
and Latin America has occurred disproportionately along the edges of PAs.<br />
Mechanisms <strong>for</strong> this growth have been disputed. In this talk, we present<br />
a broad approach <strong>for</strong> identifying potential mechanisms <strong>for</strong> accelerated<br />
human population growth at PA edges be<strong>for</strong>e and after PA establishment.<br />
We found that a majority of PAs in Africa and Latin America experienced<br />
higher human population growth along their edges after establishment,<br />
while less than 15% of PAs analyzed appeared to repulse human<br />
populations. As many as 1/3 of PAs appear to have undergone accelerated<br />
population growth due to an expanding rural frontier rather than PA<br />
establishment. Our results suggest that PAs in Africa and Latin America are<br />
attracting humans to their edges. The causes and consequences of such a<br />
result must be determined at a more local scale and through case studies. To<br />
that end, we also present a list of the 201 PAs analyzed and the mechanisms<br />
associated with their growth.<br />
2011-12-08 15:30 Connectivity in coral reef conservation planning:<br />
Dealing with future challenges<br />
Beger, M*, The University of Queensland;<br />
In this talk I discuss approaches and benefits to incorporate connections<br />
into systematic conservation planning. Connectivity between land and<br />
seascapes, as well as dispersal connectivity in the sea are a frontier in<br />
conservation science and practice. Technical challenges with obtaining<br />
meaningful data and utilizing them in transparent systematic approaches<br />
have largely prevented the consideration of connectivity in conservation<br />
decision processes. I highlight these challenges, and provide solutions<br />
to some, based on case studies that include: (1) using thermal stress and<br />
freshwater inundation risk to prioritise Great Barrier Reefs (GBR) <strong>for</strong><br />
conservation, (2) planning marine reserve networks with asymmetric<br />
connectivity on the GBR, and (3) planning with multi-species connectivity<br />
in the Coral Triangle. With these examples, I present a framework of<br />
incorporating the spatial, temporal and species-specific variability of<br />
connectivity that is underpinned by the newly developed capability of the<br />
decision support system MARXAN to incorporate connectivity.<br />
2011-12-06 10:30 Mini-keynote: The science behind large landscape<br />
connectivity initiatives<br />
Beier, Paul*, Northern Arizona University;<br />
Connectivity analyses – including least-cost modeling, circuit theory,<br />
graph-theory, & individual-based movement models – depend crucially<br />
on estimates of the “resistance” of land covers, topographic features, and<br />
human-created landscape features. In this symposium, Spear explains how<br />
resistance quantifies relationships between landscape features and gene<br />
flow. Resistance values are usually based on expert opinion or inferred from<br />
habitat use. Empirical procedures provide better estimates, especially if<br />
based on patterns of genetic relatedness. Three speakers (Cushman, Wang,<br />
& Graves) describe alternative ways to identify the set of resistance values<br />
most consistent with observed genetic patterns. In each case, empirical<br />
resistance estimates differed from subjective assignments in a way that led<br />
to different strategies <strong>for</strong> species and landscapes of conservation concern.<br />
The last 2 speakers explore different aspects of resistance. Because climate<br />
change may render species-conservation plans moot, Beier advocates<br />
planning <strong>for</strong> connectivity of land facets (coarse-filter units representing<br />
unique combinations of soil & topography) and describes how to estimate<br />
resistance <strong>for</strong> these units. McKelvey describes how to use resistance estimates<br />
to characterize connectivity across an entire landscape, independent<br />
of putative starting points. Implementing these approaches to support<br />
conservation on 4 continents is explored in tomorrow’s continuation of this<br />
symposium as SY18.<br />
2011-12-08 15:00 A Century of Trophic Change: Retrospective<br />
Analysis of Fishing and Oceanographic Variability on Seabird Diets<br />
Beissinger, S.R.*, U.C. Berkeley; Becker, B.H., Point Reyes<br />
National Seashore; Moody, A., U.C. Berkeley; Semmens, B.,<br />
Northwest Fisheries Lab, NOAA; Ward, E., Northwest Fisheries Lab,<br />
NOAA; de Valpine, P., U.C. Berkeley;<br />
Overfishing has changed marine community structure, species dominance<br />
and ecosystem characteristics. Subsequently, trophic interactions observed<br />
today might be artifacts of recent structural changes to marine communities.<br />
However, the relative impacts of overfishing are often difficult to distinguish<br />
from natural variability in fish stocks due in part to fluctuations in ocean<br />
climate that affects community composition. We investigate how the<br />
trophic level of five marine avian predators (Cassin’s Auklet, Common<br />
Murre, Marbled Murrelet, Pelagic Cormorant and Tufted Puffin), which<br />
differ in contemporary food habits (from planktivorous to piscivorous to<br />
omnivorous), has varied over the past century in the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Current by<br />
reconstructing their diets from changes in their stable isotopic signatures,<br />
and whether diet variation can be attributed to the overfishing of prey<br />
or cyclic changes in ocean temperature. Trophic-level declines (i.e., δ15<br />
N) occurred in all 5 seabirds examined. No diets exhibited an increase in<br />
trophic level. The magnitude of decline ranged from 0.43 o/oo to 2.10 o/oo,<br />
representing a decline of 1/7 to 2/3rds of a marine trophic level (3.1 o/oo).<br />
Declines differed by season and no species declined in both seasons. Linear<br />
declines were most common, making identification of the onset of decline<br />
unclear. Both bottom-up effects of changing ocean climate (regional and<br />
local) and top-down effects of fish hauls were related to trophic variation.<br />
11