Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
Studies have shown that conservation actions have been both successful at<br />
preventing extinctions and also at engineering dramatic recoveries of species<br />
once on the edge. While indicators demonstrate that the CBD 2010 target<br />
was not achieved, it is estimated that observed trends in extinction risk<br />
among mammals, birds and amphibians would have deteriorated at least<br />
one-fifth again had it not been <strong>for</strong> conservation ef<strong>for</strong>ts. However, such<br />
estimates are conservative, because they fail, in particular, to account <strong>for</strong><br />
deteriorations or losses that might have occurred had no action at all been<br />
taken. Consequently, to determine the actual difference that conservation<br />
makes to trends in species extinction risk, it is necessary to determine<br />
the counterfactual scenario of what would have happened in the absence<br />
of conservation action to compare with the observation of what actually<br />
happened. Here, we adopt a novel methodology that involves projecting<br />
trends in extinction risk from a pre-determined point in the past to the<br />
present based on a scenario under which all conservation actions had ceased.<br />
Our results provide insights to the true impact of conservation, and the value<br />
of current interventions. We place these results in the context of the future<br />
work and priorities of the 8,000-member strong, IUCN Species Survival<br />
Commission.<br />
2011-12-07 11:00 Ranking Eradication of Invasive Vertebrates on<br />
Islands at a Global Scale<br />
Holmes, ND*, Island <strong>Conservation</strong>; Arnal, A, Island <strong>Conservation</strong>;<br />
Croll, DA, Coastal and <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Lab, Dept Ecology and<br />
Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Santa Cruz; Kiett, BS,<br />
Island <strong>Conservation</strong>; McCreless, E, Coastal and <strong>Conservation</strong> Action<br />
Lab, Dept Ecology and Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />
Santa Cruz; Newton, KM, Coastal and <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Lab,<br />
Dept Ecology and Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Santa<br />
Cruz; Spatz, D, Coastal and <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Lab, Dept Ecology<br />
and Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Santa Cruz;<br />
Tershy, B, Coastal and <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Lab, Dept Ecology and<br />
Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Santa Cruz<br />
Islands have disproportionately high rates of threatened and extinct species,<br />
with invasive alien species identified as a key threat to island ecosystems.<br />
The mission of NGO Island <strong>Conservation</strong> is to prevent extinctions by<br />
removing invasive vertebrates from islands. To maximize conservation<br />
benefit and aid decision making, the Island <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Plan<br />
(ICAP) is being developed to 1) identify and 2) rank IUCN Critically<br />
Endangered and Endangered birds, reptiles, amphibians and mammals<br />
breeding on islands w<strong>here</strong> damaging invasive vertebrates occur.Of the 2,934<br />
IUCN CR/EN species, 1,123 (38%) were identified as insular. Using this<br />
species list, we collated existing datasets (e.g. Global Island Database),<br />
and consulted literature and species experts to pair CR/EN species and<br />
invasive species threats on these islands. For this process, islands with high<br />
conservation value and projected ease of eradication were targeted, using<br />
metrics including CR/EN per area, type of invasive vertebrate and overlap<br />
with other global biodiversity prioritization programs, (e.g. Alliance <strong>for</strong> Zero<br />
Extinction). This process identified opportunities to protect multiple CR/<br />
EN species on single islands in Juan Fernandez and Galapagos archipelagos<br />
as well as opportunities to protect single CR/EN species such as rock iguanas<br />
on small Caribbean cays. ICAP represents a valuable step towards ranking<br />
the mobilization of resources to aid insular threatened species recovery on<br />
a global scale.<br />
2011-12-09 11:15 Block Managements Areas: Engaging Agriculturalists<br />
in <strong>Conservation</strong> of the Yellowstone River’s Ecosystem Services<br />
Horton, Cristi C.*, Tarleton State University; Peterson, Markus J.,<br />
Texas A&M University; Hall, Damon, University of Maine-Orono;<br />
Gilbertz, Susan, Montana State Univerisity-Billings;<br />
Humans are one of many species benefitting from services provided by<br />
healthy riparian ecosystems. Managers of river resources are challenged<br />
to meet human resource needs, while meeting the needs of other species<br />
that make up the river ecosystem. This paper examines agriculturalists’<br />
communication about conservation of the Yellowstone River ecosystem<br />
services. Interviews were conducted in seven eastern counties of the river<br />
corridor to discover agriculturalists’ perspectives of the riparian zone and<br />
the critical issues regarding management of the river’s resources. We used<br />
qualitative content analysis to identify and categorize key ecosystem services<br />
that emerged from agriculturalists’ discourse about Block Management<br />
Areas. We found: provisioning, cultural, and regulating ecosystem services<br />
were critical to agriculturalists’ sense of well being; agriculturalists feared<br />
being restricted from the use of ecosystem services more than they feared the<br />
loss of services due to degradation; and Block Management Areas offered a<br />
way to conserve ecosystem services while navigating the relationship between<br />
private property rights and public access. Based on our results, we offer<br />
policy makers and resource managers a set of potential guidelines <strong>for</strong> creating<br />
and implementing conservation programs that permit agriculturalists to<br />
maintain their lifestyle while simultaneously allowing the public to benefit<br />
from ecosystem services.<br />
2011-12-07 10:30 Conserving Urban Biodiversity: The Dynamic<br />
Relationship of Policymakers, Developers, and Citizens<br />
Hostetler, ME*, Department of Wildlife Ecology and <strong>Conservation</strong>,<br />
University of Florida;<br />
Policymakers, developers, and citizens all play a role in shifting conventional<br />
development inertia to something more compatible with urban biodiversity<br />
conservation. Policymakers create policies that enable conservation practices<br />
to be adopted by developers and citizens; developers, in turn, create the<br />
framework <strong>for</strong> residential subdivisions and commercial districts that hinder<br />
or promote the conservation actions of citizens; and day-to-day decisions by<br />
citizens impact biodiversity conservation within yards, neighborhoods, and<br />
public spaces. From establishing protected natural areas and corridors to<br />
building conservation subdivisions, current urban conservation ef<strong>for</strong>ts often<br />
leave out at least one or more of these stakeholders. Through case studies<br />
and “real-world” experiences with development projects, I will discuss the<br />
importance of involving all stakeholders in order to create functioning<br />
green communities. Many green development projects fail to stand the test<br />
of time, stemming from impacts during the construction phase and how<br />
people manage their homes, yards, and neighborhoods. The way <strong>for</strong>ward is<br />
challenging, and I outline a range of processes, research, policy tools, and<br />
educational strategies that could be used to engage key stakeholder groups.<br />
In particular, I stress the importance of addressing decisions made during<br />
the design, construction, and post-construction phases of new subdivision<br />
development.<br />
2011-12-08 11:00 <strong>Conservation</strong> management of rare plant species, is<br />
eco-sourcing doing more harm than good?<br />
Houliston, G.J.*, Landcare Research;<br />
T<strong>here</strong> is currently a strong focus on “eco-sourcing”, or using local<br />
provenance material, in restoration plantings in New Zealand and other<br />
parts of the world. This practice is often promoted as being “conservative”,<br />
and is thought to preserve local adaptation. While this is likely to have<br />
no detrimental effects in species w<strong>here</strong> negative genetic consequences of<br />
fragmentation are occurring, it’s application to critically endangered taxa<br />
is worrying. We will present some examples of genetic data <strong>for</strong> critically<br />
endangered plant species that have had management actions curtailed due to<br />
“eco-sourcing” being incorporated as standard practice. This will include the<br />
New Zealand endemic tree daisy, Olearia gardneri ad the widely cultivated<br />
but almost extinct in the wild legume Clianthus puniceus. While ecosourcing<br />
may have its place, the strict ad<strong>here</strong>nce to these ideas is highly<br />
fragmented and relictual populations is potentially greatly harmful. This<br />
also raises interesting questions about when a population isn’t a population<br />
anymore, and how managers can best determine when translocation is a<br />
preferable option to maintaining local fragments.<br />
2011-12-07 12:30 The Deep Sea Coral Research and Technology<br />
Program: Research to Conserve Biodiverse Deep-Sea Ecosystems<br />
Hourigan, TF*, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service; Tsao, F.,<br />
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service;<br />
Deep-sea corals and sponges <strong>for</strong>m complex biogenic habitats of astonishing<br />
biological diversity. Be<strong>for</strong>e most areas have even been surveyed, however,<br />
these deep-sea communities are threatened, principally by damage from<br />
fishing gear. The United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric<br />
Administration (NOAA) has developed a Strategic Plan <strong>for</strong> Deep-Sea Coral<br />
and Sponge Ecosystems and launched the Deep Sea Coral Research and<br />
Technology Program, designed to provide sound scientific in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
needed to conserve these ecosystems. The Program conducts 3-year targeted<br />
field mapping and research of these communities, beginning in the Atlantic<br />
in 2009, and expanding to the U.S. West Coast (2010) and Alaska (2012).<br />
70