28.10.2014 Views

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />

Studies have shown that conservation actions have been both successful at<br />

preventing extinctions and also at engineering dramatic recoveries of species<br />

once on the edge. While indicators demonstrate that the CBD 2010 target<br />

was not achieved, it is estimated that observed trends in extinction risk<br />

among mammals, birds and amphibians would have deteriorated at least<br />

one-fifth again had it not been <strong>for</strong> conservation ef<strong>for</strong>ts. However, such<br />

estimates are conservative, because they fail, in particular, to account <strong>for</strong><br />

deteriorations or losses that might have occurred had no action at all been<br />

taken. Consequently, to determine the actual difference that conservation<br />

makes to trends in species extinction risk, it is necessary to determine<br />

the counterfactual scenario of what would have happened in the absence<br />

of conservation action to compare with the observation of what actually<br />

happened. Here, we adopt a novel methodology that involves projecting<br />

trends in extinction risk from a pre-determined point in the past to the<br />

present based on a scenario under which all conservation actions had ceased.<br />

Our results provide insights to the true impact of conservation, and the value<br />

of current interventions. We place these results in the context of the future<br />

work and priorities of the 8,000-member strong, IUCN Species Survival<br />

Commission.<br />

2011-12-07 11:00 Ranking Eradication of Invasive Vertebrates on<br />

Islands at a Global Scale<br />

Holmes, ND*, Island <strong>Conservation</strong>; Arnal, A, Island <strong>Conservation</strong>;<br />

Croll, DA, Coastal and <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Lab, Dept Ecology and<br />

Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Santa Cruz; Kiett, BS,<br />

Island <strong>Conservation</strong>; McCreless, E, Coastal and <strong>Conservation</strong> Action<br />

Lab, Dept Ecology and Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />

Santa Cruz; Newton, KM, Coastal and <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Lab,<br />

Dept Ecology and Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Santa<br />

Cruz; Spatz, D, Coastal and <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Lab, Dept Ecology<br />

and Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Santa Cruz;<br />

Tershy, B, Coastal and <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Lab, Dept Ecology and<br />

Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Santa Cruz<br />

Islands have disproportionately high rates of threatened and extinct species,<br />

with invasive alien species identified as a key threat to island ecosystems.<br />

The mission of NGO Island <strong>Conservation</strong> is to prevent extinctions by<br />

removing invasive vertebrates from islands. To maximize conservation<br />

benefit and aid decision making, the Island <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Plan<br />

(ICAP) is being developed to 1) identify and 2) rank IUCN Critically<br />

Endangered and Endangered birds, reptiles, amphibians and mammals<br />

breeding on islands w<strong>here</strong> damaging invasive vertebrates occur.Of the 2,934<br />

IUCN CR/EN species, 1,123 (38%) were identified as insular. Using this<br />

species list, we collated existing datasets (e.g. Global Island Database),<br />

and consulted literature and species experts to pair CR/EN species and<br />

invasive species threats on these islands. For this process, islands with high<br />

conservation value and projected ease of eradication were targeted, using<br />

metrics including CR/EN per area, type of invasive vertebrate and overlap<br />

with other global biodiversity prioritization programs, (e.g. Alliance <strong>for</strong> Zero<br />

Extinction). This process identified opportunities to protect multiple CR/<br />

EN species on single islands in Juan Fernandez and Galapagos archipelagos<br />

as well as opportunities to protect single CR/EN species such as rock iguanas<br />

on small Caribbean cays. ICAP represents a valuable step towards ranking<br />

the mobilization of resources to aid insular threatened species recovery on<br />

a global scale.<br />

2011-12-09 11:15 Block Managements Areas: Engaging Agriculturalists<br />

in <strong>Conservation</strong> of the Yellowstone River’s Ecosystem Services<br />

Horton, Cristi C.*, Tarleton State University; Peterson, Markus J.,<br />

Texas A&M University; Hall, Damon, University of Maine-Orono;<br />

Gilbertz, Susan, Montana State Univerisity-Billings;<br />

Humans are one of many species benefitting from services provided by<br />

healthy riparian ecosystems. Managers of river resources are challenged<br />

to meet human resource needs, while meeting the needs of other species<br />

that make up the river ecosystem. This paper examines agriculturalists’<br />

communication about conservation of the Yellowstone River ecosystem<br />

services. Interviews were conducted in seven eastern counties of the river<br />

corridor to discover agriculturalists’ perspectives of the riparian zone and<br />

the critical issues regarding management of the river’s resources. We used<br />

qualitative content analysis to identify and categorize key ecosystem services<br />

that emerged from agriculturalists’ discourse about Block Management<br />

Areas. We found: provisioning, cultural, and regulating ecosystem services<br />

were critical to agriculturalists’ sense of well being; agriculturalists feared<br />

being restricted from the use of ecosystem services more than they feared the<br />

loss of services due to degradation; and Block Management Areas offered a<br />

way to conserve ecosystem services while navigating the relationship between<br />

private property rights and public access. Based on our results, we offer<br />

policy makers and resource managers a set of potential guidelines <strong>for</strong> creating<br />

and implementing conservation programs that permit agriculturalists to<br />

maintain their lifestyle while simultaneously allowing the public to benefit<br />

from ecosystem services.<br />

2011-12-07 10:30 Conserving Urban Biodiversity: The Dynamic<br />

Relationship of Policymakers, Developers, and Citizens<br />

Hostetler, ME*, Department of Wildlife Ecology and <strong>Conservation</strong>,<br />

University of Florida;<br />

Policymakers, developers, and citizens all play a role in shifting conventional<br />

development inertia to something more compatible with urban biodiversity<br />

conservation. Policymakers create policies that enable conservation practices<br />

to be adopted by developers and citizens; developers, in turn, create the<br />

framework <strong>for</strong> residential subdivisions and commercial districts that hinder<br />

or promote the conservation actions of citizens; and day-to-day decisions by<br />

citizens impact biodiversity conservation within yards, neighborhoods, and<br />

public spaces. From establishing protected natural areas and corridors to<br />

building conservation subdivisions, current urban conservation ef<strong>for</strong>ts often<br />

leave out at least one or more of these stakeholders. Through case studies<br />

and “real-world” experiences with development projects, I will discuss the<br />

importance of involving all stakeholders in order to create functioning<br />

green communities. Many green development projects fail to stand the test<br />

of time, stemming from impacts during the construction phase and how<br />

people manage their homes, yards, and neighborhoods. The way <strong>for</strong>ward is<br />

challenging, and I outline a range of processes, research, policy tools, and<br />

educational strategies that could be used to engage key stakeholder groups.<br />

In particular, I stress the importance of addressing decisions made during<br />

the design, construction, and post-construction phases of new subdivision<br />

development.<br />

2011-12-08 11:00 <strong>Conservation</strong> management of rare plant species, is<br />

eco-sourcing doing more harm than good?<br />

Houliston, G.J.*, Landcare Research;<br />

T<strong>here</strong> is currently a strong focus on “eco-sourcing”, or using local<br />

provenance material, in restoration plantings in New Zealand and other<br />

parts of the world. This practice is often promoted as being “conservative”,<br />

and is thought to preserve local adaptation. While this is likely to have<br />

no detrimental effects in species w<strong>here</strong> negative genetic consequences of<br />

fragmentation are occurring, it’s application to critically endangered taxa<br />

is worrying. We will present some examples of genetic data <strong>for</strong> critically<br />

endangered plant species that have had management actions curtailed due to<br />

“eco-sourcing” being incorporated as standard practice. This will include the<br />

New Zealand endemic tree daisy, Olearia gardneri ad the widely cultivated<br />

but almost extinct in the wild legume Clianthus puniceus. While ecosourcing<br />

may have its place, the strict ad<strong>here</strong>nce to these ideas is highly<br />

fragmented and relictual populations is potentially greatly harmful. This<br />

also raises interesting questions about when a population isn’t a population<br />

anymore, and how managers can best determine when translocation is a<br />

preferable option to maintaining local fragments.<br />

2011-12-07 12:30 The Deep Sea Coral Research and Technology<br />

Program: Research to Conserve Biodiverse Deep-Sea Ecosystems<br />

Hourigan, TF*, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service; Tsao, F.,<br />

NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service;<br />

Deep-sea corals and sponges <strong>for</strong>m complex biogenic habitats of astonishing<br />

biological diversity. Be<strong>for</strong>e most areas have even been surveyed, however,<br />

these deep-sea communities are threatened, principally by damage from<br />

fishing gear. The United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric<br />

Administration (NOAA) has developed a Strategic Plan <strong>for</strong> Deep-Sea Coral<br />

and Sponge Ecosystems and launched the Deep Sea Coral Research and<br />

Technology Program, designed to provide sound scientific in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

needed to conserve these ecosystems. The Program conducts 3-year targeted<br />

field mapping and research of these communities, beginning in the Atlantic<br />

in 2009, and expanding to the U.S. West Coast (2010) and Alaska (2012).<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!