Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
2011-12-06 15:45 Incorporating Predation Risk into Nesting Decisions<br />
by an Urban Adapter and an Urban Avoider<br />
Kearns, LJ*, The Ohio State University; Rodewald, AD, The Ohio<br />
State University;<br />
Behavior can indicate the adaptability of a species to novel environments,<br />
such as urban ecosystems with altered predator communities. In urban<br />
<strong>for</strong>est fragments in central Ohio, USA, we studied the northern cardinal<br />
(Cardinalis cardinalis), an urban adapter, and the Acadian flycatcher<br />
(Empidonax virescens), an urban avoider, to compare how nest-site selection<br />
behaviors might be influenced by predation risk, and if so, what types of<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation about that risk might be most influential. We assessed how<br />
changes in vegetation characteristics between subsequent nesting attempts<br />
were influenced by public in<strong>for</strong>mation about 1) the predator community<br />
or 2) the risk of nest depredation at a site, or 3) private in<strong>for</strong>mation based<br />
on fate of previous nests built that season. We evaluated models with these<br />
predictor variables and julian date of nest attempt using Akaike’s In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
Criterion (AIC). For changes in nest height, the top model included only<br />
previous nest fate and julian date <strong>for</strong> cardinals, and julian date <strong>for</strong> flycatchers.<br />
However, the top model <strong>for</strong> predicting change in nest concealment <strong>for</strong><br />
cardinals included predation risk and julian date, and nest concealment<br />
increased between subsequent nests as the risk of nest depredation increased.<br />
For flycatchers, however, the top model only included julian date. These<br />
results suggest that the urban adapter may be more responsive to predation<br />
risk than the urban avoider at the nest-site scale.<br />
2011-12-08 18:30 Metapopulations, mitochondria and McMansions:<br />
<strong>Conservation</strong> genetics of an endangered Australian frog in an urbanising<br />
landscape.<br />
Keely, Claire C*, The University of Melbourne; Parris, Kirsten M,<br />
The University of Melbourne; Heard, Geoff W, The University of<br />
Melbourne; Melville, Jane E, Museum Victoria; Hamer, AJ, Royal<br />
Botanic Gardens Melbourne;<br />
Urbanisation is a leading cause of species extinctions worldwide and is<br />
considered a major threat to global biodiversity. Recently proposed urban<br />
growth boundaries will increase the extent of Melbourne, Australia, by an<br />
additional ~40,000 hectares. The endangered Growling Grass Frog (Litoria<br />
rani<strong>for</strong>mis) will be directly impacted by Melbourne’s urban expansion over<br />
the next few decades. Remnant populations of this frog occur throughout<br />
the proposed urban growth areas, and the species is known to be sensitive to<br />
habitat fragmentation caused by urbanisation. I assessed the genetic structure<br />
and diversity of remnant populations of L. rani<strong>for</strong>mis across Melbourne’s<br />
urban fringe, as part of broader research on the conservation requirements<br />
of this species. Tissue samples were collected from 270 individuals, and<br />
combined with a further 178 samples from an existing collection. Haplotype<br />
composition and diversity were determined by sequencing a fragment of the<br />
mitochondrial gene, COI. Preliminary analyses reveal similarities between<br />
populations distributed across Melbourne’s north, with shared haplotypes<br />
present. In<strong>for</strong>mation acquired during this project will be integrated into<br />
models of metapopulation viability <strong>for</strong> L. rani<strong>for</strong>mis around Melbourne,<br />
and will in<strong>for</strong>m specific management options such as reintroductions and<br />
translocations.<br />
2011-12-09 11:15 Protected Area Restoration: Investing in Ecological<br />
Integrity and Resilience in a Changing World<br />
KEENLEYSIDE, K.A.*, Parks Canada; Pellatt, M.G., Parks<br />
Canada; McLennan, D, Parks Canada; Dumouchel, C, Parks<br />
Canada; Woodley, S, Parks Canada;<br />
Increasingly, individual countries, the scientific community, and conservation<br />
organizations are recognizing that parks and other protected areas play a key<br />
role in contributing natural solutions to the challenges posed by climate<br />
change. This presentation focuses on how actions aimed at protecting,<br />
connecting, and restoring ecosystems, and connecting people with nature,<br />
enhance ecological, social and economic resilience to climate change. We use<br />
examples from Parks Canada’s experience in restoring ecological integrity to<br />
illustrate how protected areas policies that are well-aligned with conservation<br />
science can contribute to meeting global biodiversity and climate change<br />
goals. The presentation demonstrates how ecological restoration activities<br />
in and around protected areas play a role in climate change adaptation and<br />
mitigation at the same time that they re-establish or enhance biodiversity<br />
and ecological connectivity, provide meaningful educational and visitor<br />
experiences, and contribute to the well-being of local communities.<br />
2011-12-06 11:15 Linking environmental policy and conservation of<br />
ecosystem services – evaluating social and ecological controls in an<br />
agricultural ecosystem<br />
Kelly Garbach*, University of Cal<strong>for</strong>nia Davis, Departments of<br />
Envirnomental Science & Policy, Plant Sciences; Alejandra Martínez-<br />
Salinas, CATIE Center <strong>for</strong> Tropical Agriculture Research and Higher<br />
Education; Mark Lubell, University of Cal<strong>for</strong>nia Davis, Department<br />
of Envirnomental Science & Policy; Fabrice A.J. De Clerck, CATIE<br />
Center <strong>for</strong> Tropical Agriculture Research and Higher Education;<br />
Valerie T. Eviner, University of Cal<strong>for</strong>nia Davis, Department of<br />
Plant Sciences;<br />
Agricultural lands are increasingly being called upon to provide biodiversity<br />
habitat and multiple ecosystem services. Payment <strong>for</strong> Ecosystem Services<br />
(PES) is emerging as a policy tool to promote conservation practices, such<br />
as planting live fences (hedgerows) in pasture-dominated systems. However,<br />
concerns about resource competition between trees and herbaceous species<br />
have prevented their widespread adoption. This study investigated: 1) the<br />
role of PES in driving live fence adoption and management; and 2) influence<br />
of live fences on the availability and distribution of three ecosystem services:<br />
bird diversity, pasture productivity, and microclimate regulation. Interviews<br />
with 101 farmers revealed that participating in PES significantly increased<br />
use of multistrata live fences (un-pruned trees, full canopy), compared<br />
with non-participants; PES participation did not influence use of simple<br />
live fences (pruned trees, sparse canopy). Un-pruned multistrata fences<br />
had unique influence on ecosystem services: multistrata live fences hosted<br />
twice as many bird species as surrounding pastures and simple live fences.<br />
Multistrata fences resulted in a ≤5m tradeoff zone directly beneath the tree<br />
canopy, in which midday air temperatures were mitigated by 10 °C and<br />
pasture productivity was reduced by up to 60%. In contrast, simple live<br />
fences did not reduce pasture productivity, but also did not have significant<br />
benefits <strong>for</strong> bird diversity or microclimate regulation.<br />
2011-12-09 13:15 Will global change alter mast seeding in tussock<br />
grasslands?<br />
Kelly, D*, Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury; Geldenhuis,<br />
A, Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury; Byrom, AE,<br />
Landcare Research; James, A, Mathematics and Statistics, University<br />
of Canterbury; Holland, EP, Landcare Research; Lee. WG, Landcare<br />
Research; Plank, M, Mathematics and Statistics, University of<br />
Canterbury; Cowan, PE, Landcare Research<br />
Many plants worldwide show mast seeding (synchronous highly variable<br />
seed crops among years), often triggered by temperature cues. T<strong>here</strong> has<br />
been much speculation about how global change might alter the magnitude,<br />
frequency, and spacing of high-seed years in mast-seeding species, with<br />
downstream effects on seed predation, plant regeneration, and the speed<br />
of elevational shifts in species ranges. Whether, and how, climate change<br />
alters reproduction depends on the exact mechanisms that plants use<br />
to trigger high-seed years. Here we present a novel mechanism <strong>for</strong> how<br />
masting plants respond to temperature cues, using New Zealand snow<br />
tussocks (Chionochloa species) as an example. This mechanism both fits<br />
the observational data better than previous models, and predicts that global<br />
change will not cause long-term changes in mast seeding patterns.<br />
2011-12-06 11:30 Experimental reintroduction of a macropod into an<br />
environment with predators; comparing their habitat use during the<br />
establishment phase to post establishment.<br />
KEMP, LF*, The University of Adelaide; Carthew, S, The University<br />
of Adelaide; Johnston, G, University of South Australia;<br />
Forty-six tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii eugenii) were experimentally<br />
reintroduced into Innes National Park in South Australia. Predators were<br />
present, and animals were intensively radio-tracked over a 21 month period.<br />
The establishment phase post reintroduction is a critical time as animals<br />
may fail to survive if they cannot find resources and avoid predators in an<br />
unfamiliar habitat. The experimental reintroduction tested whether release<br />
group familiarity influenced anti-predator strategies, as indicated by habitat<br />
use. Results showed that during the establishment phase (first month post<br />
82