28.10.2014 Views

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />

site, and between molecular and field-based estimates of dispersal from the<br />

same study site. The results reveal that the inferences made from these<br />

landscape genetic methods are highly consistent and accurate across space<br />

and time, providing strong confidence <strong>for</strong> the efficacy of these methods<br />

<strong>for</strong> population management, the detection of dispersal corridors, and<br />

identifying the importance of preserving specific landscape features.<br />

2011-12-08 15:30 Environmental ethics: meeting the ethical challenges<br />

from opponents of lethal control of invasive animals<br />

Warburton, B*, Landcare Research; Norton, B, Georgia Institute<br />

of Technology;<br />

Since early humans started to migrate, natural barriers to plant and animal<br />

dispersal have been broken down and species have been translocated<br />

(“introduced”) deliberately or accidentally to new ecosystems. When<br />

released from their native predators, competitors, and diseases, some species<br />

become well established and abundant, and have a significant impact on<br />

natural environments, agriculture, and human health and infrastructure.<br />

Often these invasive species have to be managed (often killed), but in<br />

dealing with a sentient species, conflict can arise between those (one part of<br />

the community) wanting to protect the indigenous species and ecosystems<br />

threatened, and those (individuals in the wider community) wanting to<br />

protect individuals of the pest species. Such conflicts often lead to opponents<br />

of control believing they have the ethical high ground and those involved in<br />

the killing often at a loss on how to deal with the philosophical arguments<br />

posed by the opposition. When the target species are sentient, t<strong>here</strong> is never<br />

universal agreement on whether control is necessary or, when it is, how<br />

it should be implemented. The extent to which an introduced species is<br />

characterized as good or bad is a value judgment, and such judgments often<br />

lead to conflicts. Some philosophers have suggested that an invasive species<br />

policy based on aesthetic, ethical, or spiritual values might be legitimate,<br />

but when based on nebulous concepts of biodiversity, harm, and impact,<br />

such policy can be challenged. T<strong>here</strong> are two major philosophical positions:<br />

one focusing on individuals (animal rights and animal liberation) and the<br />

other on communities and ecosystems (holistic eco- or biocentric ethics).<br />

We will expand the arguments <strong>for</strong> these two positions and then suggest an<br />

adaptive management approach as a possible pragmatic solution as a way of<br />

addressing the ethical concerns posed by the wider community.<br />

2011-12-08 11:15 Climate change impacts on the terrestrial<br />

biodiversity and carbon stocks of Oceania<br />

Wardell-Johnson, GW*, Curtin Institute <strong>for</strong> Biodiversity and<br />

Climate; Keppel, G, Curtin Institute <strong>for</strong> Biodiversity and Climate;<br />

Sander, J, Curtin Institute <strong>for</strong> Biodiversity and Climate;<br />

We review the threats from anthropogenic climate change to the terrestrial<br />

biodiversity of Oceania, and quantify decline in carbon stocks. Oceania’s<br />

rich terrestrial biodiversity is facing unprecedented threats through<br />

the interaction of pervasive environmental threats (de<strong>for</strong>estation and<br />

degradation; introduced and invasive species; fragmentation) and the<br />

effects of anthropogenic climate change (sea level rise; altered rainfall<br />

patterns and increased fire frequency; temperature rises and increased storm<br />

severity, extreme weather events and abrupt system changes). All nine of<br />

Oceania’s terrestrial biomes harbour ecosystems and habitat types that are<br />

highly vulnerable under climate change, posing an immense conservation<br />

challenge. Current policies and management practices are inadequate and<br />

the need <strong>for</strong> new legislation and economic mechanisms is clear, despite<br />

powerful interests committed to limiting progress. Mitigation can be<br />

achieved by increasing the effectiveness of the protected area network,<br />

by maintaining and effectively managing existing carbon stocks and<br />

biodiversity, and by re<strong>for</strong>estation to sequester atmospheric carbon. A<br />

price on carbon emissions may encourage less carbon-intensive energy use<br />

while simultaneously encouraging re<strong>for</strong>estation on long-cleared land, and<br />

reducing degradation of native <strong>for</strong>ests. However, realising these changes<br />

will require societal change, and depend on input and collaboration<br />

from multiple stakeholders to devise and engage in shared, responsible<br />

management.<br />

2011-12-06 10:30 Mongoose management and recoveries of endemic<br />

vertebrates on Amami-oshima Island, Japan<br />

Watari, Y*, Japan Forest Technology Association; Nagumo, S, The<br />

International University of Kagoshima; Kubo, S, The International<br />

University of Kagoshima; Yamada, F, Forestry and Forest Product<br />

Research Institute; Abe, S, Ministry of the Environment; Fukasawa,<br />

M, The University of Tokyo;<br />

Assessing conservation outcomes is crucial <strong>for</strong> validating/improving<br />

management strategy, testing scientific hypothesis, and consensus<br />

development in the society. This is especially important <strong>for</strong> the invasive<br />

mammal managements, which are usually conducted under high cost,<br />

complex species interactions, and issue of ethics. However, t<strong>here</strong> are not so<br />

many programs that incorporate the assessment program.Amami-oshima<br />

Island (712km2) is located on the Nansei Islands, southern Japan, which<br />

harbors numbers of endemic species. In 1979, the mongoose (Herpestes<br />

auropunctatus) was introduced to this island, causing destructions of native<br />

species populations. Japanese governments begun to control mongoose<br />

population since early 00’s, and recently density of the mongoose has<br />

dramatically reduced. We have conducted monitoring program <strong>for</strong> native<br />

vertebrates since 2003, when the density of the mongoose was highest. The<br />

results suggest that four species, including Amami Rabbit and three frog<br />

species increased in their abundance, three of which also expanded their<br />

distribution. In contrast, native ground-dwelling bird did not show recovery.<br />

Differences <strong>for</strong> each species in potential habitat distribution, effects of other<br />

invasives, and dispersal abilities might cause these different responses to the<br />

mongoose reduction. This study is the first example to show the recoveries<br />

of native species after mongoose management on massive island.<br />

2011-12-08 11:00 What is needed to increase the capacity of Australia’s<br />

protected area system to represent thfreatened species?<br />

Watson, J*, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Evans, M., University<br />

of Queensland; Carwardine, J., CSIRO; Fuller, R., University of<br />

Queensland; Joseph, L., Widlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Segan, D.,<br />

University of Queensland; Taylor, M., WWF-Australia; Possingham,<br />

H., University of Queensland<br />

Protected areas are an important tool in threatened species conservation,<br />

buffering populations from many types of threatening processes. Here,<br />

we assess how effectively Australia’s protected areas (89 million ha, 11.6%<br />

of the continent) overlap with the geographic distributions of terrestrial<br />

threatened species and compare this against both a random solution and<br />

a spatially ‘efficient’ solution created with the spatial prioritization tool<br />

Marxan. We define minimum area targets <strong>for</strong> each species based on range<br />

size and level of vulnerability. While the current configuration of protected<br />

areas per<strong>for</strong>ms better than a random solution, 166 (12.6%) threatened<br />

species occur entirely outside protected areas and only 259 (19.6%) species<br />

achieve target levels of protection. Critically Endangered species were<br />

among those most under-represented, with 12 (21.1%) species occurring<br />

entirely outside protected areas. Reptiles and plants were the most poorly<br />

represented taxonomic groups, and amphibians the best represented. Spatial<br />

prioritization analysis revealed that an efficient protected area system of<br />

the same size (11.6% of Australia) could meet representation targets <strong>for</strong><br />

1272 (93.3%) of threatened species. Moreover, we show that by protecting<br />

17.8% of Australia, all threatened species could achieve target levels of<br />

representation, assuming all current protected areas are retained. While<br />

this is theoretically achievable, existing land uses and the finite resources<br />

<strong>available</strong> <strong>for</strong> conservation mean that land acquisition may not always be<br />

possible or even effective <strong>for</strong> the recovery of threatened species.<br />

2011-12-08 14:00 What does connectivity conservation actually mean<br />

<strong>for</strong> terrestrial conservation planning in a time of climate change?<br />

Watson, J.EM*, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Mackey, B.,<br />

Australian National University;<br />

The reality of human-<strong>for</strong>ced rapid climate change presents an unprecedented<br />

challenge to the conservation of biodiversity. However, that the current<br />

approach to conservation planning based on accumulating small amounts<br />

of protected lands across Earth, using a set of arbitrary conservation<br />

‘targets’, will not be effective in mitigating the impacts of human-<strong>for</strong>ced<br />

climate change on biodiversity. We argue that regional and continental wide<br />

‘connectivity conservation’ strategies are needed that incorporates a larger<br />

adaptation agenda- one that recognizes the importance of protecting and<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!