Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
site, and between molecular and field-based estimates of dispersal from the<br />
same study site. The results reveal that the inferences made from these<br />
landscape genetic methods are highly consistent and accurate across space<br />
and time, providing strong confidence <strong>for</strong> the efficacy of these methods<br />
<strong>for</strong> population management, the detection of dispersal corridors, and<br />
identifying the importance of preserving specific landscape features.<br />
2011-12-08 15:30 Environmental ethics: meeting the ethical challenges<br />
from opponents of lethal control of invasive animals<br />
Warburton, B*, Landcare Research; Norton, B, Georgia Institute<br />
of Technology;<br />
Since early humans started to migrate, natural barriers to plant and animal<br />
dispersal have been broken down and species have been translocated<br />
(“introduced”) deliberately or accidentally to new ecosystems. When<br />
released from their native predators, competitors, and diseases, some species<br />
become well established and abundant, and have a significant impact on<br />
natural environments, agriculture, and human health and infrastructure.<br />
Often these invasive species have to be managed (often killed), but in<br />
dealing with a sentient species, conflict can arise between those (one part of<br />
the community) wanting to protect the indigenous species and ecosystems<br />
threatened, and those (individuals in the wider community) wanting to<br />
protect individuals of the pest species. Such conflicts often lead to opponents<br />
of control believing they have the ethical high ground and those involved in<br />
the killing often at a loss on how to deal with the philosophical arguments<br />
posed by the opposition. When the target species are sentient, t<strong>here</strong> is never<br />
universal agreement on whether control is necessary or, when it is, how<br />
it should be implemented. The extent to which an introduced species is<br />
characterized as good or bad is a value judgment, and such judgments often<br />
lead to conflicts. Some philosophers have suggested that an invasive species<br />
policy based on aesthetic, ethical, or spiritual values might be legitimate,<br />
but when based on nebulous concepts of biodiversity, harm, and impact,<br />
such policy can be challenged. T<strong>here</strong> are two major philosophical positions:<br />
one focusing on individuals (animal rights and animal liberation) and the<br />
other on communities and ecosystems (holistic eco- or biocentric ethics).<br />
We will expand the arguments <strong>for</strong> these two positions and then suggest an<br />
adaptive management approach as a possible pragmatic solution as a way of<br />
addressing the ethical concerns posed by the wider community.<br />
2011-12-08 11:15 Climate change impacts on the terrestrial<br />
biodiversity and carbon stocks of Oceania<br />
Wardell-Johnson, GW*, Curtin Institute <strong>for</strong> Biodiversity and<br />
Climate; Keppel, G, Curtin Institute <strong>for</strong> Biodiversity and Climate;<br />
Sander, J, Curtin Institute <strong>for</strong> Biodiversity and Climate;<br />
We review the threats from anthropogenic climate change to the terrestrial<br />
biodiversity of Oceania, and quantify decline in carbon stocks. Oceania’s<br />
rich terrestrial biodiversity is facing unprecedented threats through<br />
the interaction of pervasive environmental threats (de<strong>for</strong>estation and<br />
degradation; introduced and invasive species; fragmentation) and the<br />
effects of anthropogenic climate change (sea level rise; altered rainfall<br />
patterns and increased fire frequency; temperature rises and increased storm<br />
severity, extreme weather events and abrupt system changes). All nine of<br />
Oceania’s terrestrial biomes harbour ecosystems and habitat types that are<br />
highly vulnerable under climate change, posing an immense conservation<br />
challenge. Current policies and management practices are inadequate and<br />
the need <strong>for</strong> new legislation and economic mechanisms is clear, despite<br />
powerful interests committed to limiting progress. Mitigation can be<br />
achieved by increasing the effectiveness of the protected area network,<br />
by maintaining and effectively managing existing carbon stocks and<br />
biodiversity, and by re<strong>for</strong>estation to sequester atmospheric carbon. A<br />
price on carbon emissions may encourage less carbon-intensive energy use<br />
while simultaneously encouraging re<strong>for</strong>estation on long-cleared land, and<br />
reducing degradation of native <strong>for</strong>ests. However, realising these changes<br />
will require societal change, and depend on input and collaboration<br />
from multiple stakeholders to devise and engage in shared, responsible<br />
management.<br />
2011-12-06 10:30 Mongoose management and recoveries of endemic<br />
vertebrates on Amami-oshima Island, Japan<br />
Watari, Y*, Japan Forest Technology Association; Nagumo, S, The<br />
International University of Kagoshima; Kubo, S, The International<br />
University of Kagoshima; Yamada, F, Forestry and Forest Product<br />
Research Institute; Abe, S, Ministry of the Environment; Fukasawa,<br />
M, The University of Tokyo;<br />
Assessing conservation outcomes is crucial <strong>for</strong> validating/improving<br />
management strategy, testing scientific hypothesis, and consensus<br />
development in the society. This is especially important <strong>for</strong> the invasive<br />
mammal managements, which are usually conducted under high cost,<br />
complex species interactions, and issue of ethics. However, t<strong>here</strong> are not so<br />
many programs that incorporate the assessment program.Amami-oshima<br />
Island (712km2) is located on the Nansei Islands, southern Japan, which<br />
harbors numbers of endemic species. In 1979, the mongoose (Herpestes<br />
auropunctatus) was introduced to this island, causing destructions of native<br />
species populations. Japanese governments begun to control mongoose<br />
population since early 00’s, and recently density of the mongoose has<br />
dramatically reduced. We have conducted monitoring program <strong>for</strong> native<br />
vertebrates since 2003, when the density of the mongoose was highest. The<br />
results suggest that four species, including Amami Rabbit and three frog<br />
species increased in their abundance, three of which also expanded their<br />
distribution. In contrast, native ground-dwelling bird did not show recovery.<br />
Differences <strong>for</strong> each species in potential habitat distribution, effects of other<br />
invasives, and dispersal abilities might cause these different responses to the<br />
mongoose reduction. This study is the first example to show the recoveries<br />
of native species after mongoose management on massive island.<br />
2011-12-08 11:00 What is needed to increase the capacity of Australia’s<br />
protected area system to represent thfreatened species?<br />
Watson, J*, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Evans, M., University<br />
of Queensland; Carwardine, J., CSIRO; Fuller, R., University of<br />
Queensland; Joseph, L., Widlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Segan, D.,<br />
University of Queensland; Taylor, M., WWF-Australia; Possingham,<br />
H., University of Queensland<br />
Protected areas are an important tool in threatened species conservation,<br />
buffering populations from many types of threatening processes. Here,<br />
we assess how effectively Australia’s protected areas (89 million ha, 11.6%<br />
of the continent) overlap with the geographic distributions of terrestrial<br />
threatened species and compare this against both a random solution and<br />
a spatially ‘efficient’ solution created with the spatial prioritization tool<br />
Marxan. We define minimum area targets <strong>for</strong> each species based on range<br />
size and level of vulnerability. While the current configuration of protected<br />
areas per<strong>for</strong>ms better than a random solution, 166 (12.6%) threatened<br />
species occur entirely outside protected areas and only 259 (19.6%) species<br />
achieve target levels of protection. Critically Endangered species were<br />
among those most under-represented, with 12 (21.1%) species occurring<br />
entirely outside protected areas. Reptiles and plants were the most poorly<br />
represented taxonomic groups, and amphibians the best represented. Spatial<br />
prioritization analysis revealed that an efficient protected area system of<br />
the same size (11.6% of Australia) could meet representation targets <strong>for</strong><br />
1272 (93.3%) of threatened species. Moreover, we show that by protecting<br />
17.8% of Australia, all threatened species could achieve target levels of<br />
representation, assuming all current protected areas are retained. While<br />
this is theoretically achievable, existing land uses and the finite resources<br />
<strong>available</strong> <strong>for</strong> conservation mean that land acquisition may not always be<br />
possible or even effective <strong>for</strong> the recovery of threatened species.<br />
2011-12-08 14:00 What does connectivity conservation actually mean<br />
<strong>for</strong> terrestrial conservation planning in a time of climate change?<br />
Watson, J.EM*, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Mackey, B.,<br />
Australian National University;<br />
The reality of human-<strong>for</strong>ced rapid climate change presents an unprecedented<br />
challenge to the conservation of biodiversity. However, that the current<br />
approach to conservation planning based on accumulating small amounts<br />
of protected lands across Earth, using a set of arbitrary conservation<br />
‘targets’, will not be effective in mitigating the impacts of human-<strong>for</strong>ced<br />
climate change on biodiversity. We argue that regional and continental wide<br />
‘connectivity conservation’ strategies are needed that incorporates a larger<br />
adaptation agenda- one that recognizes the importance of protecting and<br />
177