25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011 dataset from a protected area management agency in Queensland, Australia covering over 100,000 km2 across 1000+ sites to examine this topic. We quantified the effect of stochastic events on management costs and examined the ways in which managers adapted to these challenges. Our results show that natural disasters such as cyclones and well publicised occurrences of human-wildlife conflict such as animal attacks were important drivers of resource allocation across the protected area network. Managers’ main adaptations, given their largely static budgets, were to shift resources away from planned activities towards crisis management. Our results show that t<strong>here</strong> is a mismatch between static protected area budgets and the highly variable demands placed on those budgets. This presents an additional challenge <strong>for</strong> protected area management agencies over and above those of chronic underfunding. We recommend that more flexible funding arrangements be put in place to allow agencies to respond to stochastic events without sacrificing their usual management activities to the detriment of biodiversity conservation. 2011-12-09 15:30 Disentangling the correlates of African protected area conservation per<strong>for</strong>mance CRAIGIE, I. D.*, University of Cambridge; Balm<strong>for</strong>d, A., University of Cambridge; Carbone, C., Institute of Zoology, London; Protected areas (PAs) vary in their ability to maintain their biodiversity through time. The causes of this variation are poorly understood, but disentangling them may yield benefits <strong>for</strong> PA management and biodiversity conservation. Here we explored what best predicts the population trends of 586 large (>5kg) vertebrate populations in 81 African PAs. Population trends were calculated from population time series collated from published and unpublished sources. We evaluated the effect of a range of explanatory variables including: the characteristics of the PAs (such as their size, surrounding human population density and staffing levels) and the species traits of the vertebrates they contain. We followed an in<strong>for</strong>mation theoretic approach using linear mixed models to account <strong>for</strong> non-independence of the variables, and built several different models to address unavoidable gaps in the data. Species trends were less negative in PAs with more staff per unit area, <strong>for</strong> larger bodied-species, and <strong>for</strong> more recent time series. The effect of PA size was complex, the results showed that larger PAs per<strong>for</strong>med more poorly than small PAs with the likely cause being fewer staff per unit area in larger PAs. These results show that lack of resources can outweigh the expected benefits of larger PAs and that an increased level of resources is likely to lead to improved conservation per<strong>for</strong>mance of African PAs <strong>for</strong> large vertebrates. 2011-12-07 10:30 Invasive vertebrates on islands: scope of the problem, data needs, and approaches Croll, DA*, Coastal <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Laboratory, Ecology and Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Santa Cruz; Tershy, BR, Coastal <strong>Conservation</strong> Action Laboratory, Ecology and Evolutionary <strong>Biology</strong>, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Santa Cruz; Sixty four percent of all extinct species recorded by the IUCN and 40% of all Critically Endangered species are endemic to the worlds’ ~179,000 marine islands. Because islands are only 5% of earth’s land area, the number of Extinct and Critically Endangered species / ha is an order of magnitude greater on islands than on continents. Invasive vertebrates are the leading cause extinction on islands and the second most important cause of endangerment on islands. Crude estimates suggest that invasive vertebrates occur on ~40% of all islands (~70,000) and, because larger islands are more likely to be invaded, ~80% of all island area (~75 million ha). Eradication of invasive vertebrates from islands can save species from extinction and the number, frequency and size of successful eradications have steadily increased. Still only ~1% of invaded islands have had one or more invasive vertebrates eradicated. To prevent future extinctions, conservation biologists need to: 1. Develop new methods to make eradication faster and less expensive 2. Determine which islands have both vulnerable endemic species and damaging invasive vertebrates 3. Develop prioritization models that integrate an insular species’ risk of extinction, its vulnerability to a given invasive vertebrate and the cost of eradicating that invasive vertebrate from one or more islands 2011-12-06 14:00 Prioritising and Evaluating Biodiversity Projects CULLEN, R*, Lincoln University; WHITE, PA, University of York; Funds <strong>available</strong> <strong>for</strong> biodiversity projects are scarce. Choices must t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e be made on how to use limited resources most effectively, and such decisions should be based on clear and measurable objectives <strong>for</strong> achievement. Biodiversity projects should be evaluated to determine if the use of scarce resources has achieved the objective (effectiveness), and if the projects achieve the objective at lower cost than alternative uses of the resources (cost effectiveness). Project selection and evaluation methods are used patchily by biodiversity project providers and researchers. We provide an introduction to project selection and evaluation; point to the range of selection and evaluation methods <strong>available</strong>; ask w<strong>here</strong> they are best applied; and focus attention on the need to overcome the hurdles to adoption and continuation of project selection and evaluation methods. 2011-12-07 15:15 Gender and stress affect facilitation intensity in a widespread cushion plant CRANSTON, B*, University of Otago; Callaway, RM, University of Montana; Monks, A, Landcare Research; Dickinson, KJM, University of Otago; Facilitation allows plants to occupy environments otherwise uninhabitable, potentially leading to range expansions, shifts in realised niches, and/ or increased rates of invasion. Gynodioecy provides good opportunities to explore the effects and costs of facilitation because females and hermaphrodites often differ in resource allocation patterns, stress tolerance, and the intensity of facilitation often varies along stress gradients. We investigated the role of gender and stress on the facilitative effects and costs <strong>for</strong> the gynodioecious alpine plant, Silene acaulis across two elevations (2317 m and 2560 m) in the Rocky Mountains of Montana, USA. Consistent with general theory <strong>for</strong> abiotic stress and facilitation, the positive effect of Silene on community richness and the abundance was greater at the high elevation site than the low. Furthermore, the proportional increase in cover of beneficiaries was greater at high elevation <strong>for</strong> female plants, but lower <strong>for</strong> hermaphrodites. This indicates that the intensity of facilitation increased with stress associated with elevation, but that this increase was greater <strong>for</strong> females. As the cover of beneficiaries in female Silene cushions increased, Silene flower production and leaf size decreased, indicating a significant cost of facilitation, but this effect was less <strong>for</strong> hermaphrodites. Intense facilitation by female Silene, coupled with higher costs suggests that females might be more easily displaced by beneficiaries than hermaphrodites. 2011-12-09 15:15 Socioeconomic drivers of sea turtle interactions with artisanal fisheries in the western Indian Ocean islands Cunningham, E*, C3 Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands Programme; Poonian, CNS, Community Centred <strong>Conservation</strong> (C3), 17 Northcliffe Drive, London, N20 8JX; Whitty, T, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego; Bycatch is a global threat to sea turtles with artisanal fisheries posing particular challenges in terms of data collection, monitoring and mitigation strategies. Due to the decentralized nature of artisanal fisheries, limited infrastructure <strong>for</strong> research and monitoring in developing countries, and logistical obstacles to establishing observer programs, collecting data on bycatch through interviews is recognized as a practical method <strong>for</strong> estimating the magnitude of bycatch in artisanal fisheries We conducted over 1000 rapid assessment surveys of sea turtle bycatch in artisanal fisheries of the Union of the Comoros, Mauritius and Madagascar in the Western Indian Ocean using semi-structured interviews of fishers. Bycatch was found to pose a serious threat to sea turtle populations. It was reported as a routine occurrence by fishers in Madagascar and Comoros in a variety of fishing gears, particularly gillnets in Madagascar and longlines in Comoros and Mauritius. Although turtles were often released alive, mortality was generally high and turtles were often killed and eaten or sold in Comoros and Madagascar. Various local traditions and taboos were also found to influence artisanal fishers’ interactions with sea turtles at all study sites. The heterogeneity of gears used by artisanal fishers, and the potential <strong>for</strong> sea turtle bycatch in a variety of gear types indicated by this work suggests that mitigating turtle bycatch in artisanal fisheries in the western Indian Ocean requires close collaboration with fishing communities including capacity-building and awareness raising to ensure that management actions are implemented effectively. Addressing 34
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011 the impacts of these fisheries on sea turtles will require examination of the potential <strong>for</strong> alternative livelihoods and locally- en<strong>for</strong>ced regulations. These results demonstrate the deep human roots of fisheries interactions with sea turtles that must be understood <strong>for</strong> effective management and conservation. 2011-12-07 14:00 The Influence of Model Structure on Science-Based Advice <strong>for</strong> Species at Risk Curtis, Janelle*, Pacific Biological Station; Naujokaitis-Lewis, Ilona, University of Toronto; Distribution-based recovery targets are ideally in<strong>for</strong>med with habitat-based spatially-explicit demographic models. In practice, recovery teams used occurrence (18%) or habitat suitability (63%) models to provide advice, while
- Page 1 and 2: ABSTRACTS 25th International Congre
- Page 3 and 4: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 5 and 6: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 7 and 8: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 9 and 10: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 11 and 12: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 13 and 14: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 15 and 16: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 17 and 18: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 19 and 20: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 21 and 22: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 23 and 24: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 25 and 26: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 27 and 28: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 29 and 30: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 31 and 32: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 33 and 34: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 35: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 39 and 40: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 41 and 42: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 43 and 44: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 45 and 46: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 47 and 48: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 49 and 50: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 51 and 52: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 53 and 54: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 55 and 56: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 57 and 58: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 59 and 60: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 61 and 62: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 63 and 64: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 65 and 66: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 67 and 68: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 69 and 70: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 71 and 72: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 73 and 74: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 75 and 76: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 77 and 78: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 79 and 80: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 81 and 82: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 83 and 84: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 85 and 86: 25th International Congress for Con
- Page 87 and 88:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 89 and 90:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 91 and 92:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 93 and 94:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 95 and 96:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 97 and 98:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 99 and 100:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 101 and 102:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 103 and 104:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 105 and 106:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 107 and 108:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 109 and 110:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 111 and 112:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 113 and 114:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 115 and 116:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 117 and 118:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 119 and 120:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 121 and 122:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 123 and 124:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 125 and 126:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 127 and 128:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 129 and 130:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 131 and 132:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 133 and 134:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 135 and 136:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 137 and 138:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 139 and 140:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 141 and 142:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 143 and 144:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 145 and 146:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 147 and 148:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 149 and 150:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 151 and 152:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 153 and 154:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 155 and 156:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 157 and 158:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 159 and 160:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 161 and 162:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 163 and 164:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 165 and 166:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 167 and 168:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 169 and 170:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 171 and 172:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 173 and 174:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 175 and 176:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 177 and 178:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 179 and 180:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 181 and 182:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 183 and 184:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 185 and 186:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 187 and 188:
25th International Congress for Con
- Page 189 and 190:
Index Benini, Rubens 42 Beniston, M
- Page 191 and 192:
Index DeWan, Amielle 14 Dianne Brun
- Page 193 and 194:
Index Hilborn, Ray 27 Hill, CM 176
- Page 195 and 196:
Index Loutit, R. 116 Louwe Kooijman
- Page 197 and 198:
Index Ottewell, K 81 Overton, J 61,
- Page 199 and 200:
Index Sequeira, Ana 151 Serebryakov
- Page 201 and 202:
Index Winandy, L 181 Winner, J. 112