28.10.2014 Views

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />

long-term planning that interrupts the decreasing importance of natural<br />

environment in the lives of urban people. Urban societies need to be<br />

encouraged to develop an awareness and understanding of the importance<br />

of ecosystem services and the role they play in urban environments, and<br />

ultimately human well-being. Enhancing natural biodiversity in urban<br />

environments and engaging urban dwellers with nature may help natural<br />

heritage be integrated with valid cultural values. This poster describes the<br />

design and development of prototype ceramic tile concepts to be used as<br />

a boundary structure to support the establishment of living walls <strong>for</strong> large<br />

concrete facades on city buildings, by establishing a complex 3D substrate<br />

to support early colonising species and act a substrate <strong>for</strong> continued<br />

biological invasion by a diverse range of plant and animal species. Over the<br />

longer-term the product should require no general maintenance to ensure<br />

continued functional integrity. The ultimate success of the product would<br />

result in the establishment of ongoing ecosystem processes. The proposed<br />

design exploits the potential to provide an internal cavity that is able to<br />

‘house’ plant and animal species. This ‘living’ substrate will not likely<br />

require seeding of initial colonisers, but as a substrate will provide habitat<br />

<strong>for</strong> a range of species (while excluding urban animal pests i.e. mice/rats<br />

etc), that may colonise when ecological requirements are satisfied by prior<br />

successional colonising organisms. In its initial installed state the ceramic<br />

tile will represent an aesthetically clean and simple structure. Over time this<br />

structure will weather, require minimal or no maintenance and will start to<br />

‘wear’ as biological entities ad<strong>here</strong> and develop. Over time it is anticipated<br />

that the structure will trans<strong>for</strong>m to become a dynamic structure that<br />

harbours and supports on-going biological (ecological) activity. A novel<br />

aspect of the proposed ceramic product is that the ecological requirements<br />

of invertebrates are considered.<br />

2011-12-08 15:30 Migratory patterns of humpback whales in<br />

Colombia and the selection of areas included in the Corredor Marino<br />

del Pacífico Oriental Tropical<br />

Recalde-Salas, Angela *, Fundación Yubarta. Cali, Colombia - The<br />

University of Queensland, Cetacean Ecology and Acoustics Laboratory.<br />

Gatton, Australia.; Flórez-González, Lilián, Fundación Yubarta.<br />

Cali, Colombia.; Wilson, Howard, The University of Queensland,<br />

The Ecology Centre. St Lucia, Australia; Noad, Michael, The<br />

University of Queensland, Cetacean Ecology and Acoustics Laboratory.<br />

Gatton, Australia.; Capella, Juan, Fundación Yubarta. Cali,<br />

Colombia; Tobón, Isabel, Fundación Yubarta. Cali, Colombia;<br />

The presence or absence of a species was one of the points taken into<br />

account to select areas or regions included in the “Corredor Marino del<br />

Pacífico Oriental Tropical (CMPOT)”. However, <strong>for</strong> migratory species<br />

such as humpback whales, presence is not enough to select one area over<br />

other. Quantitative analysis of the migratory patterns of the southeast<br />

pacific humpback whale population, were per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> two areas in the<br />

Colombian Pacific Coast: Gorgona National Natural Park (GI) and Málaga<br />

Bay (MB). The analysis per<strong>for</strong>med using probabilistic methods, showed<br />

low connectivity between the areas both within a season and between the<br />

seasons, and a higher rate of return to MB. Analysis also showed differences<br />

in habitat use; MB is mainly a destination and nursing area, and GI a transit<br />

and courtship one. Based on these differences, it is possible to consider<br />

MB as the main breeding area in Colombia and should be considered as<br />

an additional area <strong>for</strong> the CMPOT, which already includes GI. We also<br />

conclude that <strong>for</strong> humpback whales, ecological aspects such as return and<br />

movements should be considered as well as presence or absence in the<br />

selection of areas included in marine corridors.<br />

2011-12-06 15:30 Giving Equal <strong>Conservation</strong> Priority to Ecosystems<br />

Protects Low Levels of Biodiversity<br />

Redding, DW*, Manchester Metropolitan University; Marsden, S,<br />

Manchester Metropolitan University;<br />

A ‘Convention <strong>for</strong> Biodiversity’ target set in 2004, asked governments to<br />

work together to ensure that at least 10% of each major ecoregion was<br />

protected by 2010. We ask: Was giving equal conservation priority to each<br />

ecoregion an approach that was going to maximise biodiversity protection?<br />

Using data from only those bird species abundant enough to be conserved<br />

at each of our 400 neotropical study sites, we found giving different weights<br />

to each ecoregion conserved up to 10 times as many species, compared<br />

to giving each ecoregion equal priority. We compare those ecoregions that<br />

were found to be consistently high priority, irrespective of the geographical<br />

area considered, and compared them to the current levels of protection, to<br />

identify high priority targets in the neotropics.<br />

2011-12-08 10:45 Defining the Burden of Proof in <strong>Conservation</strong><br />

REDFORD, KENT H.*, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Salafsky,<br />

Nick, Foundations of Success;<br />

<strong>Conservation</strong> practitioners often must take action in the face of uncertainty<br />

about the costs and benefits of different options. For example, should a<br />

critically endangered frog population be managed in the wild, or brought<br />

into captive breeding? Or, should a land trust facilitate a conservation<br />

easement on a wetland owned by a large oil company? In each case, although<br />

the decision makers cannot wait <strong>for</strong> absolute certainty be<strong>for</strong>e taking action,<br />

is t<strong>here</strong> some standard “burden of proof” that they need to meet so that<br />

it can be said that they acted in good faith and are “blameless” <strong>for</strong> the<br />

results of their decision? <strong>Conservation</strong>ists are not the only professionals<br />

facing these situations. Medical doctors deciding on treatment options <strong>for</strong><br />

an ill patient, judges making sentencing decisions, and soldiers and police<br />

officers following rules of engagement <strong>for</strong> using deadly <strong>for</strong>ce all have to<br />

meet burdens of proof established within their profession. We examine<br />

these other professions and use the findings to propose a taxonomy of issues<br />

based on the level of risk associated with an incorrect decision and suggest<br />

ways that these issues be given higher profile in the practice of conservation.<br />

2011-12-06 12:00 Hunting <strong>for</strong> solutions to problems of predator<br />

management in UK<br />

Redpath, S.M.*, ACES, Aberdeen University;<br />

Birds of prey are still illegally killed in the UK by game managers and this<br />

presents conservation with a real challenge. I will examine approaches taken<br />

to managing this issue in the specific example of the UK uplands, w<strong>here</strong> I<br />

have worked <strong>for</strong> 26 years. I will highlight the alternative perspectives of those<br />

involved and summarise the natural and social science that has been done<br />

to understand this fascinating and revealing problem. I will then explore<br />

the alternative approaches taken to finding solutions, consider the variety<br />

of solutions that have been proposed and the barriers that have prevented<br />

resolution. I will end by considering the role of science, legislation and<br />

dialogue in finding a solution to this problem, and the broader implications<br />

<strong>for</strong> conservation.<br />

2011-12-09 11:30 <strong>Conservation</strong> Science Expertise <strong>for</strong> Local Land Use<br />

Planning and Residential Development<br />

REED, SE*, Colorado State University/Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>;<br />

High rates of land development around the world, the gap in funding<br />

<strong>available</strong> <strong>for</strong> land protection, and the need <strong>for</strong> dynamic conservation<br />

strategies in a changing climate all make this a critical time to examine new<br />

approaches <strong>for</strong> incorporating conservation objectives into development<br />

practices. <strong>Conservation</strong> development (CD) is an alternative approach to the<br />

site design of a development property that protects or restores its ecological<br />

resources and clusters housing on the remainder of the site. Although<br />

CD accounts <strong>for</strong> a growing proportion of residential development and<br />

private land conservation activity, design standards <strong>for</strong> how to implement<br />

CD were developed with limited involvement of conservation scientists,<br />

and the resulting CD projects are rarely evaluated <strong>for</strong> their conservation<br />

effectiveness. We will review guidelines and incentives <strong>for</strong> CD in local<br />

land use regulations and the resulting land use and conservation patterns<br />

in CD projects that are implemented through these regulations. We will<br />

discuss how conservation biology theory and research—specifically, the<br />

principles of reserve design, conservation planning, and protected area<br />

management—can be used to improve the conservation effectiveness of CD<br />

projects. We conclude with recommendations <strong>for</strong> how SCB and its member<br />

scientists can engage in regional land use policy and local development<br />

projects to shape future development patterns and improve the outcomes<br />

<strong>for</strong> conservation.<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!