Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />
long-term planning that interrupts the decreasing importance of natural<br />
environment in the lives of urban people. Urban societies need to be<br />
encouraged to develop an awareness and understanding of the importance<br />
of ecosystem services and the role they play in urban environments, and<br />
ultimately human well-being. Enhancing natural biodiversity in urban<br />
environments and engaging urban dwellers with nature may help natural<br />
heritage be integrated with valid cultural values. This poster describes the<br />
design and development of prototype ceramic tile concepts to be used as<br />
a boundary structure to support the establishment of living walls <strong>for</strong> large<br />
concrete facades on city buildings, by establishing a complex 3D substrate<br />
to support early colonising species and act a substrate <strong>for</strong> continued<br />
biological invasion by a diverse range of plant and animal species. Over the<br />
longer-term the product should require no general maintenance to ensure<br />
continued functional integrity. The ultimate success of the product would<br />
result in the establishment of ongoing ecosystem processes. The proposed<br />
design exploits the potential to provide an internal cavity that is able to<br />
‘house’ plant and animal species. This ‘living’ substrate will not likely<br />
require seeding of initial colonisers, but as a substrate will provide habitat<br />
<strong>for</strong> a range of species (while excluding urban animal pests i.e. mice/rats<br />
etc), that may colonise when ecological requirements are satisfied by prior<br />
successional colonising organisms. In its initial installed state the ceramic<br />
tile will represent an aesthetically clean and simple structure. Over time this<br />
structure will weather, require minimal or no maintenance and will start to<br />
‘wear’ as biological entities ad<strong>here</strong> and develop. Over time it is anticipated<br />
that the structure will trans<strong>for</strong>m to become a dynamic structure that<br />
harbours and supports on-going biological (ecological) activity. A novel<br />
aspect of the proposed ceramic product is that the ecological requirements<br />
of invertebrates are considered.<br />
2011-12-08 15:30 Migratory patterns of humpback whales in<br />
Colombia and the selection of areas included in the Corredor Marino<br />
del Pacífico Oriental Tropical<br />
Recalde-Salas, Angela *, Fundación Yubarta. Cali, Colombia - The<br />
University of Queensland, Cetacean Ecology and Acoustics Laboratory.<br />
Gatton, Australia.; Flórez-González, Lilián, Fundación Yubarta.<br />
Cali, Colombia.; Wilson, Howard, The University of Queensland,<br />
The Ecology Centre. St Lucia, Australia; Noad, Michael, The<br />
University of Queensland, Cetacean Ecology and Acoustics Laboratory.<br />
Gatton, Australia.; Capella, Juan, Fundación Yubarta. Cali,<br />
Colombia; Tobón, Isabel, Fundación Yubarta. Cali, Colombia;<br />
The presence or absence of a species was one of the points taken into<br />
account to select areas or regions included in the “Corredor Marino del<br />
Pacífico Oriental Tropical (CMPOT)”. However, <strong>for</strong> migratory species<br />
such as humpback whales, presence is not enough to select one area over<br />
other. Quantitative analysis of the migratory patterns of the southeast<br />
pacific humpback whale population, were per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> two areas in the<br />
Colombian Pacific Coast: Gorgona National Natural Park (GI) and Málaga<br />
Bay (MB). The analysis per<strong>for</strong>med using probabilistic methods, showed<br />
low connectivity between the areas both within a season and between the<br />
seasons, and a higher rate of return to MB. Analysis also showed differences<br />
in habitat use; MB is mainly a destination and nursing area, and GI a transit<br />
and courtship one. Based on these differences, it is possible to consider<br />
MB as the main breeding area in Colombia and should be considered as<br />
an additional area <strong>for</strong> the CMPOT, which already includes GI. We also<br />
conclude that <strong>for</strong> humpback whales, ecological aspects such as return and<br />
movements should be considered as well as presence or absence in the<br />
selection of areas included in marine corridors.<br />
2011-12-06 15:30 Giving Equal <strong>Conservation</strong> Priority to Ecosystems<br />
Protects Low Levels of Biodiversity<br />
Redding, DW*, Manchester Metropolitan University; Marsden, S,<br />
Manchester Metropolitan University;<br />
A ‘Convention <strong>for</strong> Biodiversity’ target set in 2004, asked governments to<br />
work together to ensure that at least 10% of each major ecoregion was<br />
protected by 2010. We ask: Was giving equal conservation priority to each<br />
ecoregion an approach that was going to maximise biodiversity protection?<br />
Using data from only those bird species abundant enough to be conserved<br />
at each of our 400 neotropical study sites, we found giving different weights<br />
to each ecoregion conserved up to 10 times as many species, compared<br />
to giving each ecoregion equal priority. We compare those ecoregions that<br />
were found to be consistently high priority, irrespective of the geographical<br />
area considered, and compared them to the current levels of protection, to<br />
identify high priority targets in the neotropics.<br />
2011-12-08 10:45 Defining the Burden of Proof in <strong>Conservation</strong><br />
REDFORD, KENT H.*, Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>; Salafsky,<br />
Nick, Foundations of Success;<br />
<strong>Conservation</strong> practitioners often must take action in the face of uncertainty<br />
about the costs and benefits of different options. For example, should a<br />
critically endangered frog population be managed in the wild, or brought<br />
into captive breeding? Or, should a land trust facilitate a conservation<br />
easement on a wetland owned by a large oil company? In each case, although<br />
the decision makers cannot wait <strong>for</strong> absolute certainty be<strong>for</strong>e taking action,<br />
is t<strong>here</strong> some standard “burden of proof” that they need to meet so that<br />
it can be said that they acted in good faith and are “blameless” <strong>for</strong> the<br />
results of their decision? <strong>Conservation</strong>ists are not the only professionals<br />
facing these situations. Medical doctors deciding on treatment options <strong>for</strong><br />
an ill patient, judges making sentencing decisions, and soldiers and police<br />
officers following rules of engagement <strong>for</strong> using deadly <strong>for</strong>ce all have to<br />
meet burdens of proof established within their profession. We examine<br />
these other professions and use the findings to propose a taxonomy of issues<br />
based on the level of risk associated with an incorrect decision and suggest<br />
ways that these issues be given higher profile in the practice of conservation.<br />
2011-12-06 12:00 Hunting <strong>for</strong> solutions to problems of predator<br />
management in UK<br />
Redpath, S.M.*, ACES, Aberdeen University;<br />
Birds of prey are still illegally killed in the UK by game managers and this<br />
presents conservation with a real challenge. I will examine approaches taken<br />
to managing this issue in the specific example of the UK uplands, w<strong>here</strong> I<br />
have worked <strong>for</strong> 26 years. I will highlight the alternative perspectives of those<br />
involved and summarise the natural and social science that has been done<br />
to understand this fascinating and revealing problem. I will then explore<br />
the alternative approaches taken to finding solutions, consider the variety<br />
of solutions that have been proposed and the barriers that have prevented<br />
resolution. I will end by considering the role of science, legislation and<br />
dialogue in finding a solution to this problem, and the broader implications<br />
<strong>for</strong> conservation.<br />
2011-12-09 11:30 <strong>Conservation</strong> Science Expertise <strong>for</strong> Local Land Use<br />
Planning and Residential Development<br />
REED, SE*, Colorado State University/Wildlife <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong>;<br />
High rates of land development around the world, the gap in funding<br />
<strong>available</strong> <strong>for</strong> land protection, and the need <strong>for</strong> dynamic conservation<br />
strategies in a changing climate all make this a critical time to examine new<br />
approaches <strong>for</strong> incorporating conservation objectives into development<br />
practices. <strong>Conservation</strong> development (CD) is an alternative approach to the<br />
site design of a development property that protects or restores its ecological<br />
resources and clusters housing on the remainder of the site. Although<br />
CD accounts <strong>for</strong> a growing proportion of residential development and<br />
private land conservation activity, design standards <strong>for</strong> how to implement<br />
CD were developed with limited involvement of conservation scientists,<br />
and the resulting CD projects are rarely evaluated <strong>for</strong> their conservation<br />
effectiveness. We will review guidelines and incentives <strong>for</strong> CD in local<br />
land use regulations and the resulting land use and conservation patterns<br />
in CD projects that are implemented through these regulations. We will<br />
discuss how conservation biology theory and research—specifically, the<br />
principles of reserve design, conservation planning, and protected area<br />
management—can be used to improve the conservation effectiveness of CD<br />
projects. We conclude with recommendations <strong>for</strong> how SCB and its member<br />
scientists can engage in regional land use policy and local development<br />
projects to shape future development patterns and improve the outcomes<br />
<strong>for</strong> conservation.<br />
137