28.10.2014 Views

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

Abstracts available here - Society for Conservation Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

25th International Congress <strong>for</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> • Auckland, New Zealand • 5-9 December 2011<br />

main cause. This so-called specialization-disturbance (SD) hypothesis is<br />

supported by large data sets that show positive correlation between species’<br />

ecological specialization and extinction risk. But, managers on the ground<br />

need finer detail on how specialization increases sensitivity to disturbance.<br />

To test the SD hypothesis and support endangered species conservation, I<br />

studied the population-level responses of two coexisting fruit bats in the<br />

Philippines to their main threats: habitat loss and roost site disturbance. My<br />

results suggest the specialist is much more sensitive to disturbance than the<br />

generalist. Population abundance correlates closely with native <strong>for</strong>est cover<br />

<strong>for</strong> both species (R2>0.92). However, the specialist is uniquely dependent<br />

on <strong>for</strong>est, with a 3-dimensional ecological niche that lies only in <strong>for</strong>est and<br />

is entirely included within the larger niche of the generalist. The specialist<br />

populations are less abundant and require >5.6 times more <strong>for</strong>est than<br />

generalists. The specialist is also >6.2 times more sensitive to disturbance at<br />

and around the roost than the generalist. To maintain persisting populations<br />

of the specialist species, managers need to address colony compositions that<br />

are heavily skewed toward the generalist and strictly protect roost sites and<br />

surrounding <strong>for</strong>est from disturbance.<br />

2011-12-07 14:40 Adapting Toward the Best of Both Worlds: Natural<br />

Resource and Infrastructure Vulnerability Assessment of the Hudson<br />

River Estuary<br />

Miller, D.*, New York State Department of Environmetal<br />

<strong>Conservation</strong>, Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve;<br />

Spector, S., Scenic Hudson; Winner, J., Scenic Hudson; Blair, B.,<br />

New York State Department of Environmetal <strong>Conservation</strong>, Hudson<br />

River National Estuarine Research Reserve;<br />

Sea level rise (SLR) is the most immediate climate change challenge to the<br />

Hudson River Estuary ecosystem, with up to 1.4m of relative SLR projected<br />

by 2080. Within the projected inundation zone lie over 13,000 acres of<br />

tidal wetlands and vegetated shallows, and over 5000 acres of supratidal<br />

and floodplain habitats that will likely be inundated. We conducted a<br />

vulnerability analysis that provides stakeholders with a high-resolution<br />

understanding, through both space and time, of SLR impacts on the<br />

estuary’s natural habitats and built infrastructure and creates a planning<br />

framework <strong>for</strong> local and regional adaptation ef<strong>for</strong>ts. Along 160 miles of<br />

tidal river we 1) projected inundation and flood risk according to two SLR<br />

scenarios, with models reiterated at decadal time steps, 2) identified river<br />

stretches and sites that have important natural or built resources within or<br />

near the risk zone, and 3) classified each site according to their resiliency<br />

or vulnerability to periodic or constant inundation. Our results identified<br />

sites at which natural resource conservation and infrastructure protection<br />

may proceed independently, as well as areas of potential conflict w<strong>here</strong><br />

balanced solutions must be found. Considering these conflict zones through<br />

time, and considering them within a whole-estuary context, provided<br />

different perspectives on trade-offs between shoreline hardening and<br />

habitat migration and point the way toward a range of locally-appropriate<br />

management options.<br />

2011-12-09 14:40 Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s MLPA Initiative: Transitioning A<br />

Science-driven and Stakeholder-based Planning Process to Decisionmakers<br />

and Resource Managers<br />

Miller-Henson, Melissa*, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Marine Life Protection Act<br />

Initiative; Fox, Evan, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Marine Life Protection Act Initiative;<br />

States and nations are increasingly placing priority on area-based planning<br />

and management that involves not only the best science, but also active<br />

participation of local communities and stakeholders. However, t<strong>here</strong> are<br />

challenges to designing planning ef<strong>for</strong>ts that can then successfully transition<br />

to decision-making and resource management when they are conducted<br />

by different organizations. The Cali<strong>for</strong>nia MLPA Initiative (MLPAI), was<br />

created and charged with helping the state redesign its MPAs through a<br />

science-driven, public planning process w<strong>here</strong> stakeholders actively<br />

engaged in collaborative consultation and negotiation; the resulting<br />

recommendations were then presented to the state <strong>for</strong> decisions about how<br />

best to pursue implementation, which is carried out by two different state<br />

resource management agencies. The MLPAI was an experiment in combining<br />

consideration of how to design MPAs to achieve what are primarily<br />

ecosystem-based ecological goals with consideration of multiple human<br />

uses, interests, values and knowledge types; this type of interdisciplinary<br />

approach to addressing ecological, social and economic factors requires a<br />

flexible and adaptive approach to be successful, a model that is not common<br />

to state natural resource management. This example illustrates some of the<br />

challenges experienced; recommendations are made <strong>for</strong> how to better ensure<br />

a successful transition and improved long-term management of protected<br />

areas.<br />

2011-12-09 11:45 Evaluating an eradication program <strong>for</strong> the northern<br />

Pacific seastar, Asterias amurensis, in Victoria, Australia.<br />

Millers, Kimberley*, University of Melbourne; McCarthy, Michael,<br />

University of Melbourne; Carey, Jan, University of Melbourne;<br />

Our ability to manage a spreading introduced marine species is often<br />

impeded by the lack of scientific in<strong>for</strong>mation and limited resources.<br />

Management strategies aimed at controlling marine invasive species are<br />

often data poor and t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e continuously under review. This study aims<br />

to evaluate the management strategies of a recent incursion of the invasive<br />

seastar, Asterias amurensis, at Anderson Inlet, Victoria. In 2004, government<br />

agencies and community members commenced an eradication program to<br />

slow the spread of Asterias amurensis, along the coast of Victoria. Over the<br />

duration of the program, volunteers used a number of removal techniques<br />

to reduce the population size. Eradication was declared at Anderson Inlet<br />

in June 2004. Search method, search time, removal rate and cost were<br />

monitored during the eradication process. Over 250 individual seastars<br />

w<strong>here</strong> removed during the removal program by community volunteer divers.<br />

Removal rate decreased exponentially with time. T<strong>here</strong> are few examples of<br />

eradication of marine invasives and t<strong>here</strong><strong>for</strong>e this is a unique opportunity<br />

to gain valuable in<strong>for</strong>mation to improve the efficiency and effectiveness<br />

of resource allocation in applied real-world scenarios. The findings of this<br />

evaluation will assist managers utilise resources when managing incursions<br />

of this and other species across the southern Australian coast.<br />

Date 14:00 Integrating fisheries approaches and household utility<br />

models <strong>for</strong> improved resource management<br />

Milner-Gulland, E.J.*, Imperial College London;<br />

Natural resource management is littered with cases of over-exploitation<br />

and ineffectual management, leading to loss of both biodiversity and<br />

human welfare. Disciplinary boundaries stifle the search <strong>for</strong> solutions to<br />

these issues. I combine the approach of management strategy evaluation,<br />

widely applied in fisheries, with household utility models from conservation<br />

and development, to produce an integrated framework <strong>for</strong> evaluating the<br />

effectiveness of competing management strategies <strong>for</strong> harvested resources<br />

against a range of per<strong>for</strong>mance metrics. I demonstrate the strengths of this<br />

approach with a simple model, and use it to examine the effect of manager<br />

ignorance of household decisions on resource management effectiveness,<br />

and an allocation trade-off between monitoring resource stocks to reduce<br />

observation uncertainty and monitoring users to improve compliance. I<br />

show that this integrated framework enables management assessments to<br />

consider household utility as a direct metric <strong>for</strong> system per<strong>for</strong>mance, and<br />

that while utility and resource stock conservation metrics are well aligned,<br />

harvest yield is a poor proxy <strong>for</strong> both, because it is a product of household<br />

allocation decisions between alternate livelihood options, rather than an end<br />

in itself. This approach has potential far beyond single-species harvesting in<br />

situations w<strong>here</strong> managers are in full control, enabling a range of management<br />

intervention options to be evaluated within the same framework.<br />

2011-12-08 18:30 Wood density variation in an altitudinal gradient: a<br />

key component <strong>for</strong> determining above-ground biomass<br />

Mireia, Torello Raventos*, James Cook Univeristy; Bird, Michael,<br />

James Cook University; Saiz, Gustavo, James Cook University; Lloyd,<br />

Jon, James Cook University; Dan Metcalfe, CSIRO;<br />

More reliable knowledge on the complex responses of vegetation to climate<br />

change is one of the most urgent needs <strong>for</strong> tropical <strong>for</strong>est preservation.<br />

Quantifying the terrestrial above-ground carbon stocks in tropical <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

along an altitudinal gradient provides a way to improve the understanding<br />

of vegetation dynamics in the face of climate change. Tropical <strong>for</strong>ests are<br />

known <strong>for</strong> possessing a wide range of wood densities, adding complexity<br />

to the accurate estimation of tones of carbon per area. We have selected 9<br />

plots in tropical <strong>for</strong>ests in North Queensland, Australia along an altitudinal<br />

gradient (50-1500 m) in 2 main soil types. Throughout my PhD 1) I have<br />

placed dendrometers in my field sites to study the above-ground net primary<br />

productivity; 2) I have developed a new field-based and non-destructive<br />

method to determine the wood density in a tree plantation. 3) I am studying<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!