04.11.2014 Views

Distributed Renewable Energy Operating Impacts and Valuation Study

Distributed Renewable Energy Operating Impacts and Valuation Study

Distributed Renewable Energy Operating Impacts and Valuation Study

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Technical Value – Power Supply Capacity & <strong>Energy</strong><br />

5.1.3 Solar DE <strong>Impacts</strong> on Reliable Operations<br />

In addition to avoiding resource expansion <strong>and</strong> marginal energy production, solar DE resources<br />

may have an impact on system requirements for certain ancillary services. Ancillary services<br />

can generally be described as the amount of generating capacity that APS must have up <strong>and</strong><br />

running (committed) but constrained from running at full or optimum output to ensure that<br />

sufficient capacity reserves are available, on a nearly instantaneous basis, to meet contingencies<br />

that may occur on the system. For instance, if a generating resource trips off-line due to a<br />

mechanical problem, the load it was serving still exists <strong>and</strong>, therefore, the power the failed<br />

generator was providing must be produced from the reserves available.<br />

A key concern for solar DE resources is that ancillary services may increase as solar DE<br />

implementation increases. For instance, a cloud passing over a solar PV array would cause the<br />

array to virtually stop producing electricity until the shadow of the cloud cleared the array. If the<br />

PV array is a solar DE resource (i.e., connected to <strong>and</strong> affecting an APS customer’s load), then<br />

during the transient cloudy period when the array stopped producing power, APS would<br />

experience an increase in load, followed by a sudden reduction in load once the shadow cleared<br />

the array. Such fluctuations in load could require APS to provide for additional generating<br />

reserves anytime the solar DE resource was expected to be operating.<br />

As discussed in Section 4.4, solar DE resources are not expected to contribute significantly to<br />

APS requirements for spinning or operating reserves. This is due to the highly improbable<br />

nature of double contingency events that would necessitate additional spinning or operating<br />

reserves for solar DE. However, APS requirements for regulation reserves may be affected by<br />

solar DE installations when solar DE is installed in significant quantities.<br />

5.1.4 Single-Axis Sensitivity<br />

Power supply planning <strong>and</strong> development generally occurs on a system-wide level. Electric<br />

utilities plan to meet the load <strong>and</strong> reserve requirements of the total electric system peak dem<strong>and</strong><br />

with the total of all their generating units <strong>and</strong> power purchases. On rare occasions, when a<br />

transmission network is constrained from serving a load pocket <strong>and</strong> there are no reasonable<br />

alternatives to upgrade the transmission system, an electric utility may decide it is cheaper to<br />

build a generating resource inside the load pocket rather than upgrade the transmission system to<br />

fix the constraint. However, APS is not planning for any such conditions <strong>and</strong> there are no<br />

generating assets that can be avoided though strategically located solar DE installations.<br />

Other possible strategic considerations for power supply planning would include solar DE<br />

resources that are more readily matched to the system peak dem<strong>and</strong> hour <strong>and</strong> could provide<br />

greater capacity value. Such technologies could involve solar DE systems that have a westward<br />

orientation, solar tracking facilities, <strong>and</strong> solar storage facilities. Configuring solar facilities with<br />

a westward orientation could prove valuable to APS, but the diminished energy output from<br />

these facilities would potentially reduce the economic value to the customers <strong>and</strong>, hence,<br />

possibly the level of customer adoption. Solar tracking, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, is reasonably<br />

comparable to a fixed plate installation on a total economic basis. A solar tracking facility may<br />

have a higher cost than a fixed plate configuration, but typically produces enough additional<br />

energy value to compensate for the increased cost.<br />

With regard to battery storage, it is possible that customer installations could prove valuable to<br />

APS. However, from the perspective of power supply planning, APS is generally indifferent as<br />

<strong>Distributed</strong> <strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Operating</strong> <strong>Impacts</strong> & <strong>Valuation</strong> <strong>Study</strong> R. W. Beck, Inc. 5-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!