04.11.2014 Views

Distributed Renewable Energy Operating Impacts and Valuation Study

Distributed Renewable Energy Operating Impacts and Valuation Study

Distributed Renewable Energy Operating Impacts and Valuation Study

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix N<br />

N.3 Economic Value of Capacity Savings from Solar DE Deployment<br />

Capacity savings are more difficult <strong>and</strong> complicated to estimate as these savings represent an<br />

annual portion of avoided or reduced investment or capital costs in future test years. This<br />

includes the savings from an investment change in a specific year plus remaining investment<br />

savings from prior years.<br />

Engineering economic analysis often represents these savings with the use of a carrying charge<br />

approach. Carrying charges are utility annual obligations associated with distribution,<br />

transmission, <strong>and</strong> generation plant investments placed in service <strong>and</strong> include annual obligations<br />

from prior plant investments during the economic life of investments. To accurately represent a<br />

utility’s projected investment costs, the income taxes (both actual <strong>and</strong> deferred) must be included<br />

in the identification of carrying charges. Separate carrying charges are calculated for<br />

distribution, transmission, <strong>and</strong> generation facilities as these typically have different economic<br />

lives. The appropriate carrying charge for a facility is multiplied by the investment cost of the<br />

plant facility to estimate the annual revenue requirement cost of that plant facility.<br />

In equation form the carrying charge can be expressed as follows:<br />

CC tf = DC t + EC t + IT tf + CF tf<br />

where CC tf = Carrying Charge for each facility type in year t, expressed as a<br />

percentage<br />

DC t = APS’ debt cost in year t, expressed as a percentage<br />

EC t = APS’ after tax equity cost in year t, expressed as a percentage<br />

IT tf = APS’ effective income tax cost for each facility type f in year t,<br />

expressed as a percentage<br />

CF tf = APS’ capital recovery via depreciation rate for each facility type f<br />

in year t, expressed as a percentage<br />

Components of the carrying charge calculation can be expressed as follows:<br />

DC f = DB * COD<br />

where DB = Percent of capitalization provided by debt, expressed as a<br />

percentage<br />

COD = APS’ cost of debt cost, expressed as a percentage<br />

EC f = EB * COE<br />

where EB = Percent of capitalization provided by equity, expressed as a<br />

percentage<br />

COE = APS’ cost of debt equity on an after-tax basis, expressed as a<br />

percentage<br />

It is the product of the carrying charge for a specific facility type (i.e., distribution, transmission,<br />

or generation) times the investment cost of a facility that provides an estimate of the annual<br />

N-2 | R. W. Beck, Inc Arizona Public Service

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!