06.11.2014 Views

Annual report 2010 - plazacenters

Annual report 2010 - plazacenters

Annual report 2010 - plazacenters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Management and governance<br />

Corporate governance<br />

continued<br />

resolution in such respect shall be adopted unanimously in<br />

a meeting in which all members of the Board are present or<br />

represented. Since Mr Ran Shtarkman is, as of January 1, <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

both executive director of the Company and Co-Chief Executive<br />

Officer with Elbit Imaging, the Company’s parent company,<br />

there may be conflicts of interest in respect of Mr Shtarkman<br />

representing the Company. In order to enable Mr Shtarkman<br />

to, in his capacity of CEO represent the Company in all matters,<br />

the Articles of Association include this possibility, provided,<br />

as stated above, that in such matter the underlying Board<br />

resolution has been adopted anonymously.<br />

• Best Practice Provision II.3.4 and Best Practice Provision III.6.3<br />

stipulate inter alia that decisions to enter into transactions in<br />

which there are conflicts of interest with management board<br />

members that are of material significance to the Company<br />

and/or to the relevant Board members require the approval<br />

of the non-executive directors. Though, pursuant to the<br />

Articles, each Board member is obliged to notify all direct and<br />

indirect conflicts of interest, the Articles contain no specific<br />

approval clause.<br />

• Best Practice Provision III.1.7 stipulates that the supervisory<br />

board shall discuss at least once a year on its own, both its own<br />

functioning and that of its individual members, and the<br />

conclusions that must be drawn on the basis thereof. The<br />

desired profile, composition and competence of the supervisory<br />

board shall also be discussed. Moreover, the supervisory board<br />

shall discuss at least once a year without the management<br />

board being present, the functioning of the management board<br />

as an organ of the Company and the performance of its<br />

individual members, and the conclusions that must be drawn on<br />

the basis thereof. In <strong>2010</strong> the non-executive directors have not<br />

specifically discussed the items that appear in this Best Practice<br />

Provision on separate occasions. The Board, however, feels it<br />

important to notify the shareholders that as a rule, every Board<br />

meeting includes an assessment by all Board members of their<br />

own functioning and that of their fellow Board members.<br />

The Board is of the view that, given the fact that the Company<br />

has a one-tier board rather than a separate management board<br />

and supervisory board, this course of action appropriately meets<br />

the requirements as laid down in this Best Practice Provision.<br />

• Best Practice Provision III.1.8 stipulates that the supervisory<br />

board shall discuss at least once a year the corporate strategy<br />

and the risks of business and the results of assessment by the<br />

management board of the structure and operation of the<br />

internal risks management and control systems, as well as<br />

any significant changes thereto. In 2009, there have not been<br />

separate meetings of the non-executive directors to discuss<br />

the items mentioned in this Best Practice Provision. The reason<br />

therefore is that risk management at the Company is, pursuant<br />

to the internally applicable Corporate Governance regulations,<br />

a matter specifically reserved for decision by the full Board.<br />

Board meetings in 2009 have included discussions in respect<br />

of corporate strategy and risk management and periodically<br />

throughout the year, the internal system of risk management<br />

has been assessed by the full Board.<br />

• Best Practice Provision III.3.3 and Best Practice Provision III.4.1<br />

(a) stipulate that all supervisory board members shall follow<br />

an induction program. Since 2006, no new non-executive<br />

directors have started working in the Company and it is not<br />

envisaged that in the foreseeable future, there will be new<br />

non-executive directors, there is currently no induction<br />

program in place.<br />

• Best Practice Provision III.3.5 stipulates that a non-executive<br />

director (in terms of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code a<br />

supervisory director (commissaris)) may be appointed to the<br />

Board for a maximum of three four-year terms. Section 15 of the<br />

Articles provides for a retirement schedule whereby directors<br />

who have been in office for not less than three consecutive<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> General Meetings shall retire from office. Pursuant to<br />

section 15.6 of the Articles, such a director may be reappointed,<br />

which could result in a term of office which is longer than three<br />

four-year terms.<br />

• Best Practice Provision III.4.2 states that the chairman of the<br />

supervisory board shall not be a former member of the<br />

management board of the Company. Mr Mordechay Zisser<br />

functions as Chairman of the Board while being an executive<br />

director. For an explanation of the deviation from this Best<br />

Practice Provision, see the remark made for Best Practice<br />

Provision III.8.1.<br />

• Best Practice Provision III.5.1 provides that the committee rules<br />

stipulate that a maximum of one member of each committee<br />

need not be independent within the meaning of Best Practice<br />

Provision III.2.2 The Company’s Nomination Committee is<br />

comprised of three members, two of whom, Messrs Yitzhaki<br />

and Paap, are considered to be non-independent. The Board<br />

believes that the composition of the Nomination Committee<br />

as currently envisaged is in the best interests of the Company,<br />

given the skills and experience of the Committee members.<br />

• Best Practice provision III.5.6 stipulates that the Audit Committee<br />

must not be chaired by the Chairman of the Board or by a<br />

former executive director of the Company. The Company’s Audit<br />

Committee is chaired by Mr Shimon Yitzhaki, who has been an<br />

executive director of the Company and thus the Company<br />

deviates from this Best Practice Provision. The Board, however,<br />

believes that given Mr Yitzhaki’s extensive financial experience,<br />

chairmanship of the Audit Committee is appropriate.<br />

• Best Practice Provision III.5.11 inter alia provides that the<br />

Remuneration Committee shall not be chaired by a nonexecutive<br />

director who is either a former executive director or a<br />

member of the management board of another listed company.<br />

Since the Remuneration Committee is chaired by Mr Shimon<br />

Yitzhaki, who is a former executive director and serves as<br />

President of Elbit Imaging Ltd., the Company deviates from<br />

this requirement. The Board is convinced that the experience<br />

of Mr Yitzhaki in this respect should be considered more<br />

important than the fact that Mr Yitzhaki is a board member<br />

of another listed company.<br />

52<br />

Plaza Centers N.V. <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!