03.11.2012 Views

Ski – resort and regional development: profile of visitors ... - E-Journal

Ski – resort and regional development: profile of visitors ... - E-Journal

Ski – resort and regional development: profile of visitors ... - E-Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Measuring destination competitiveness: an exploratory study <strong>of</strong> the canaries, mainl<strong>and</strong> spain, france, the balearics <strong>and</strong> italy<br />

valid. Although the size <strong>of</strong> the sample group is small, it is not far different from other surveys<br />

used in other reference studies, like those cited in Kozak <strong>and</strong> Rimmington (1999) (n = 294)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Yoon <strong>and</strong> Uysal (2005) (n = 148). It should be highlighted that this was only a pilot study<br />

carried out during the low season. Furthermore, since it was a pilot study, the questionnaires<br />

were available in English <strong>and</strong> Spanish.<br />

The questionnaire was divided into two different sections, <strong>and</strong> headed by a series <strong>of</strong> preliminary<br />

questions. In this introductory part, the interviewees was asked whether they were a citizen<br />

<strong>of</strong> the European Union, whether they had spent this current stay on holiday in the Balearics,<br />

<strong>and</strong> whether they had been to mainl<strong>and</strong> Spain, the Canaries, France or Italy on holiday during<br />

the last two summers (2004 <strong>and</strong> 2005). Only if the interviewees answered yes to all three<br />

questions did the interviewer proceed to conduct the main body <strong>of</strong> the survey.<br />

The first part <strong>of</strong> the interview contained <strong>pr<strong>of</strong>ile</strong>-type questions, enquiring about the interviewees’<br />

country <strong>of</strong> residence, sex <strong>and</strong> age, the type <strong>of</strong> holiday they had booked, length <strong>of</strong> stay at the<br />

destination etc.<br />

In the second part, the tourists were asked to rate possible motivations that might have prompted<br />

them to choose their holiday destinations during the last two summers. Using a scale that<br />

ranged from 1 (“not at all important”) to 5 (“very important”), the tourists were asked to<br />

indicate how important certain motivations were in persuading them to visit the said destinations.<br />

A list <strong>of</strong> motivations or destination “attractors” was carefully drawn up, using various conceptual<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> destination attractors (Crouch <strong>and</strong> Ritchie, 1999; Dwyer <strong>and</strong> Kim, 2003) <strong>and</strong><br />

different empirical studies in other destinations (Kozak <strong>and</strong> Rimmington, 1999; Enright <strong>and</strong><br />

Newton, 2004; Yoon <strong>and</strong> Uysal, 2005; Kim et al., 2000). Likewise, the annual Tourist<br />

Expenditure Surveys that are conducted by the <strong>regional</strong> governments <strong>of</strong> the Balearic Isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

(Govern de les Illes Balears, 2001) <strong>and</strong> Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s (Gobierno de Canarias, 2005) were<br />

also used. These contain a list <strong>of</strong> key travel motivations for visits to both archipelagos. Finally,<br />

a workshop was held with three lecturers who specialize in tourism studies at the University<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Balearic Isl<strong>and</strong>s. As a result <strong>of</strong> all the above, 24 travel motivations or attractors were<br />

selected.<br />

Lastly, the interviewees were asked to rate their level <strong>of</strong> satisfaction with each <strong>of</strong> the above<br />

factors at each <strong>of</strong> the destinations they had visited over the last few years. Using a scale from<br />

one to five, ranging from 5 (“very satisfied”) to 1 (“not at all satisfied”), the tourists were<br />

asked to choose a value for each attractor at each destination. They were also given the<br />

opportunity to leave a blank space if they did not have enough information at their disposal<br />

to assess a particular factor (particularly in the case <strong>of</strong> motivations associated with certain<br />

market segments, such as the “existence <strong>of</strong> facilities for the elderly <strong>and</strong>/or children” or<br />

“nightlife” ).<br />

Tourism Today - Fall 2007 - Full Paper<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!