Climate change futures: health, ecological and economic dimensions
Climate change futures: health, ecological and economic dimensions
Climate change futures: health, ecological and economic dimensions
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Climate</strong> sensitivity for small-scale events can be quite high. For example, for every increase in average temperatures<br />
of 1°C we expect a 70% increase in air-to-ground lightning strikes (Reeve <strong>and</strong> Toumi 1999).<br />
Personal Automobile Insurance: The impact of catastrophes on automobile losses began to become visible during<br />
the 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s, but these understate the true extent of the losses because only those losses from catastrophic<br />
events were tabulated in association with inclement weather. As the incidence of small storms increases,<br />
roadway conditions can erode <strong>and</strong> there are more days with low visibility, icy conditions, <strong>and</strong> precipitation,<br />
resulting in a steady increase of accidents.<br />
Energy <strong>and</strong> Water Utility Systems: Increasingly extensive <strong>and</strong> interconnected energy <strong>and</strong> other systems<br />
enhance the quality of life, but also increase society’s vulnerability to natural hazards (Sullivan 2003). Energy systems<br />
are already experiencing rising losses. Under accelerated, non-linear climate <strong>change</strong>, there are increased<br />
damages to energy <strong>and</strong> water industry infrastructure, including ruptured oil <strong>and</strong> electricity transmission systems due<br />
to widespread permafrost melt throughout the northern latitudes, <strong>and</strong> risks to power plants. Increased extreme<br />
weather events, such as ice storms <strong>and</strong> heat catastrophes, cause increased numbers of blackouts <strong>and</strong> water contamination<br />
or direct damages to water plants.<br />
The following are several examples of the nature of energy system sensitivities to extreme weather events<br />
(Munich Re 2003):<br />
• The US northeast Ice Storm of 1998 was the most expensive disaster in the history of the Canadian<br />
insurance industry.<br />
• In 1998, on the other side of the world in Auckl<strong>and</strong>, New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, the most severe heat wave since 1868<br />
caused spikes in air-conditioning power dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the overloading <strong>and</strong> subsequent collapse of two electricity<br />
transmission cable lines.<br />
• In 1999, a flash of lightning plunged more than 80 million people in Sao Paulo <strong>and</strong> Rio de Janeiro, <strong>and</strong> eight<br />
other Brazilian states into darkness. Two years later, a prolonged drought — the worst in 70 years — led to a<br />
national power crisis, with rationing lasting nearly nine months.<br />
• In 1999, the great windstorms caused EU2.5 billion in damages to France’s largest electricity supplier.<br />
• In 1982, a shortage of rain forced deep load shedding in Ghana. Impacts included business interruptions of<br />
US $557 million at an aluminum smelter.<br />
• In 1993, the Des Moines Water Works was shut down due to flooding. Direct property damages <strong>and</strong> emergency<br />
measures were US $16 million, but the indirect business interruption losses resulted in 250,000 commercial<br />
<strong>and</strong> residential customers being without water for 11 days.<br />
117 | APPENDICES<br />
A particularly diverse set of risks apply in the electricity sector (Mills 2001). The current US baseline cost of electrical<br />
outages of US $80 billion per year (LaCommare <strong>and</strong> Eto 2004) could double under our scenarios. In our scenarios,<br />
businesses seek increasing business-interruption coverage for such events, <strong>and</strong> a larger share of consequent<br />
losses is paid by insurers. In addition, increasingly frequent drought conditions result in power curtailments<br />
that cause further business interruptions in regions heavily dependent on hydroelectric power. Drought plus unacceptably<br />
higher cooling water temperatures in summer 2003 forced curtailments or closures of nuclear <strong>and</strong> other<br />
thermal plants in France, Germany, Romania <strong>and</strong> Croatia <strong>and</strong> price spikes in addition (Reuters 2003, Guardian<br />
2003). Massive oil-sector losses such as those caused by Hurricane Ivan (approximately US $2.5 billion, well in<br />
excess of the year’s entire premium revenue for the sector) 5 (Miller 2004), would become more common.<br />
Premiums for vulnerable oil infrastructure were projected to double after this event, <strong>and</strong> consumers faced higher<br />
prices due to the 500,000 barrel per day supply shortfall (The Energy Daily 2004a). Emblematic of the industry’s<br />
history of underestimating its exposures, a representative of Hiscox Syndicates in London stated that “the market<br />
has had a much worse loss than ever anticipated.” Electric utilities were also hard hit, with one utility’s costs reaching<br />
US $252 million (The Energy Daily 2004b).<br />
5<br />
Hurricane Ivan destroyed seven oil platforms, damaged six others as well as five drilling platforms, <strong>and</strong> pipelines were buried by underwater<br />
mudslides in the Mississippi Delta. In Hurricanes Katrina <strong>and</strong> Rita, 109 off-shore oil rigs were destroyed <strong>and</strong> 31 severly damaged.