Climate change futures: health, ecological and economic dimensions
Climate change futures: health, ecological and economic dimensions
Climate change futures: health, ecological and economic dimensions
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
“<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> is one of the world’s top long-term risk scenarios.”<br />
- John Coomber, Former CEO, Swiss Re (Swiss Re 2004a)<br />
“A severe natural catastrophe or series of catastrophes could generate<br />
major insurance market disruptions.”<br />
-US General Accountability Office (GAO 2005)<br />
92 | FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS<br />
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS<br />
With over 3 trillion dollars in annual revenues 1 ; insurance<br />
is the world’s largest industry. 2 It represents 8% of<br />
global GDP, <strong>and</strong> would be the third largest country if<br />
revenues were compared with national GDPs.<br />
Insurance provides a mechanism for spreading risk<br />
across time, over large geographical areas, <strong>and</strong><br />
among industries. The core business of insurance traditionally<br />
involves technical strategies for loss reduction<br />
as well as financial strategies for risk management <strong>and</strong><br />
risk spreading. The growing repository of insurance<br />
loss data augments the geophysical observing systems<br />
with trends in financial losses.<br />
The core business of insurance, as well as the sector’s<br />
activities in financial services <strong>and</strong> asset management,<br />
are vulnerable to climate <strong>change</strong> (see figure 3.1). As<br />
such, insurers are impacted by <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong> to be prime<br />
movers in responding to climate <strong>change</strong> (Vellinga et<br />
al. 2001; Mills 2004). “Insurance is on the front line<br />
of climate <strong>change</strong> … <strong>and</strong> it is insurers who must be<br />
equipped to analyze the new risks that flow from climate<br />
<strong>change</strong>, <strong>and</strong> to help customers to manage these<br />
risks” (ABI 2004). Nonetheless, it must also be kept in<br />
mind that insurance is one element of a much broader<br />
patchwork for spreading risks (see figure 3.2); <strong>and</strong><br />
insurers may not have as long a time horizon as do<br />
reinsurers.<br />
Owing to the types of hazards that tend to be insured,<br />
the largest proportion of total catastrophe losses sustained<br />
by insurers is weather-related.<br />
The availability <strong>and</strong> affordability of insurance is essential<br />
to <strong>economic</strong> development, financial cohesion in<br />
society <strong>and</strong> security <strong>and</strong> peace of mind in a world<br />
where hazards abound <strong>and</strong> are increasingly unpredictable.<br />
Unanticipated <strong>change</strong>s in the nature, scale,<br />
or location of hazards — human-induced or natural —<br />
are among the most important threats to the insurance<br />
system. This has been seen repeatedly in the past in<br />
the aftermath of previously unimagined earthquakes,<br />
windstorms <strong>and</strong> terrorist events. Observers from Florida<br />
note that “[Hurricane] Andrew exposed old methods,<br />
such as trending historical hurricane loss totals, as illsuited<br />
for managing <strong>and</strong> pricing hurricane exposure”<br />
(Musulin <strong>and</strong> Rollins 2005). Despite this record, there<br />
is, oddly, continued skepticism when the specter of<br />
new <strong>and</strong> unprecedented types <strong>and</strong> patterns of events<br />
emerge. An eye-opening industry report from the mid<br />
1980s (AIRAC 1986) highlighted the importance of<br />
considering multiple catastrophes in a single year,<br />
while observers nearly 20 years later lament the catastrophic<br />
results of the industry’s failure to adopt this perspective<br />
in advance of the four-hurricane season in<br />
2004 (Musulin <strong>and</strong> Rollins 2005; Virkud 2005,<br />
Harrington et al. 2005).<br />
Most discussions <strong>and</strong> climate impact scenarios are<br />
cast from the vantage point of the natural sciences,<br />
with little if any examination of the <strong>economic</strong> implications.<br />
Moreover, the technical literature often takes a<br />
“stovepipe” approach, examining specific types of<br />
events in isolation from the real-world mosaic of often<br />
interrelated vulnerabilities, events <strong>and</strong> impacts. For<br />
example, analyzing the effects of drought on agriculture<br />
may be done in isolation, effectively suppressing<br />
1<br />
Detailed country-by-country statistics (in US dollars <strong>and</strong> local currencies) are published in Swiss Re’s annual sigma “World Insurance” reports<br />
(for example, Swiss Re 2004b). Data presented in this report represent Western-style insurance <strong>and</strong> do not include the premium equivalents<br />
that are collected from alternative systems, such as Takaful methods used in the Muslim world or so-called “self-insurance,” which is often<br />
formalized <strong>and</strong> represents considerable capacity.<br />
2<br />
Defined in terms of revenues for specific commodities or services, as opposed to more all-encompassing meta-industries such as “retail” or<br />
“technology.” The world oil market, for example, is US $970 billion/year at current production levels of 76Mbpd <strong>and</strong> US $35/bbl price<br />
[Surpassing US $60 in summer 2005]; world electricity market in 2001 was US $1 trillion at 14.8 trillion kWh generation assuming US<br />
$0.07/kWh unit price; tourism receipts were US $445 billion (2002); agriculture US $1.2 trillion (2002); world military expenditures were<br />
US $770 billion (2002). Source: 2005 Statistical Abstract of the United States.