Climate change futures: health, ecological and economic dimensions
Climate change futures: health, ecological and economic dimensions
Climate change futures: health, ecological and economic dimensions
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CLIMATE CHANGE CAN<br />
OCCUR ABRUPTLY<br />
Perhaps the most daunting factor complicating the task<br />
of estimating the future <strong>health</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>economic</strong> impacts<br />
of climate <strong>change</strong> is that most climate <strong>futures</strong> <strong>and</strong> insurance<br />
industry projections drastically underestimate the<br />
rate at which climate might <strong>change</strong>.<br />
on linear extrapolations of past trends <strong>and</strong> current trajectories,<br />
though the insurance industry has long considered<br />
“catastrophe theory” to project the impacts of<br />
sudden, extreme losses. However, these models do not<br />
predict the probabilities of such events. For climate,<br />
increasing rates of <strong>change</strong> <strong>and</strong> greater volatility are<br />
signs of instability <strong>and</strong> suggest greater propensity for<br />
sudden <strong>change</strong> (Epstein <strong>and</strong> McCarthy 2004).<br />
26 | THE CLIMATE CONTEXT TODAY<br />
Most envisioned climate <strong>futures</strong> of international assessments<br />
to date are based on gradual projections of<br />
increasing temperatures. Some include temperature<br />
variability, <strong>and</strong> others have begun to examine variance<br />
in weather patterns. But most do not reflect the<br />
high degree of variance in weather that is already<br />
occurring <strong>and</strong> few address the potential consequences<br />
of sudden <strong>change</strong> in impacts or abrupt shifts in climate<br />
itself.<br />
The notion that climate might <strong>change</strong> suddenly, or shift<br />
from state to state, rather than <strong>change</strong> gradually —<br />
what Richard Alley calls the “switch” rather than the<br />
“dial” model for climate <strong>change</strong> — seemed like a radical<br />
notion when it first began to take hold in the early<br />
1990s. In nature, however, sudden shifts are the rule,<br />
not the exception.<br />
Steven J. Gould’s conception of evolution as “punctuated<br />
equilibrium” depicts long periods of relative stability<br />
with gradual <strong>change</strong>, punctuated by periods of mass<br />
extinctions. These “interruptions” are then followed by<br />
the explosion of new species with new solutions to<br />
new environmental problems that fit together into new<br />
communities of organisms.<br />
On a more immediate time scale, non-linear <strong>change</strong>s<br />
are part of our daily experience. When temperatures<br />
<strong>change</strong>, liquid water can suddenly transform into a<br />
hard, latticed structure as it freezes or vaporizes, when<br />
it boils. Damage functions are also non-linear. For<br />
example, hailstones tend to bounce off of windshields<br />
until they reach a critical weight <strong>and</strong> break them.<br />
Though abrupt climate <strong>change</strong> is a ubiquitous phenomenon<br />
<strong>and</strong> is observed throughout ice, pollen, fossil<br />
<strong>and</strong> geological records (NAS 2002), the bias toward<br />
gradual, incremental <strong>change</strong> may reflect the constraints<br />
of climate models that represent our best underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
of how dynamic systems behave. Models have a difficult<br />
time incorporating step-wise <strong>change</strong>s to new<br />
states. Most industries naturally base their projections<br />
Even more challenging is the observation that <strong>change</strong>s<br />
in state can be triggered by small forces that approach<br />
(often unforeseen) thresholds or “tipping points” — <strong>and</strong><br />
surpass them. Disease outbreaks can slowly grow in<br />
impact, for example, then suddenly become epidemics.<br />
For the climate, the transitions between glacial <strong>and</strong><br />
interglacial warm periods can involve <strong>change</strong>s from<br />
5-10°C (9-18°F) in the span of a decade or less<br />
(Steffan et al. 2004b). Sudden shifts are sometimes<br />
restricted in geographic scope. At other times there are<br />
global transformations (Severinghaus et al. 1998;<br />
NAS 2002; Alley et al. 2003). Many such “high<br />
impact” events that were considered “low probability”<br />
just several years ago now seem to some increasingly<br />
likely (Epstein <strong>and</strong> McCarthy 2004) or inevitable<br />
(NAS 2002).<br />
TIPPING POINTS<br />
POSSIBLE “CLIMATE SHOCKS” WITH LIMITED<br />
GEOGRAPHIC IMPACTS<br />
• Small sections of Greenl<strong>and</strong>, the West Antarctic Ice<br />
Sheet (WAIS) or the Antarctic Peninsula could slip<br />
into the ocean, raising sea levels several inches to<br />
feet over years to several decades.<br />
o Meltwater is seeping down through crevasses in<br />
Greenl<strong>and</strong>, lubricating the base of large glaciers<br />
(Krabill et al. 1999; ACIA 2005).<br />
o “Rivers of ice” in the WAIS are accelerating<br />
toward the Southern Ocean (Shepherd et al.<br />
2001; Payne et al. 2004; Thomas et al. 2004).<br />
o Recent loss of floating ice shelves along the<br />
Antarctic Peninsula removes back pressure from the<br />
l<strong>and</strong>-based ice sheets (Rignot <strong>and</strong> Thomas 2002).<br />
• Alpine glacial melting could accelerate, inundating<br />
communities below <strong>and</strong> diminishing water supplies<br />
for nations dependent on this source for freshwater.