23.12.2014 Views

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102<br />

3. FUSION TECHNOLOGY<br />

3.12 Safety and Environment, Power<br />

Plant Studies and Socio-Economics<br />

3.12.1 Occupational radiation exposure assessment for ITER-FEAT<br />

The first occupational radiation exposure (ORE) analysis for ITER-FEAT was<br />

completed during 2001 [3.54]. The collective dose results provided in the previous<br />

analysis were reviewed, and the final assessment was completed regarding hands-on<br />

activities for maintaining, inspecting and/or replacing the following items:<br />

blanket/limiter, electron cyclotron heating system, ion cyclotron heating system,<br />

cryopumps, divertor cassettes, three loops of the tokamak cooling water system<br />

(TCWS). Airborne tritium was also considered, together with the other radiological<br />

sources already included in the previous study (neutron activation due to plasma<br />

burning, activated corrosion products on the inner surface of the TCWS pipes and<br />

components).<br />

The collective dose results are: for the hands-on assistance activities at the tokamak<br />

ports, 197 person-mSv/y; for the five loops of the TCWS (first-wall blanket, divertor<br />

and neutron-beam injector), 105 person-mSv/y, about 21 person-mSv/y per loop<br />

[3.55 (Vol VI)].<br />

3.12.2 Validation of computer codes and models (EFDA Task SEA5)<br />

Several simulation codes are used for the ITER safety analyses. The codes for treating<br />

thermal-hydraulic phenomena, aerosol and neutron transport, materials activation<br />

and the generation of activated corrosion products are validated by comparing them<br />

with experimental results and codes already validated, by means of benchmarks.<br />

Thermal-hydraulic phenomena<br />

To validate the thermal-hydraulic computer codes, calculations were performed<br />

[3.56] against a set of five experimental cases of loss of coolant in volumes at subatmospheric<br />

pressure in the Inlet of Coolant Events (ICE) facility at the JAERI<br />

laboratories in Japan. A further check was performed [3.57], [3.58] against a second<br />

set of four test cases, to verify the behaviour of the codes in condensation and<br />

evaporation phases. The codes involved in the campaign were the ISAS system<br />

(linking ATHENA, for thermal-hydraulic transients, and INTRA, for containment<br />

simulations) and the fast running code CONSEN. The comparison between blindtest,<br />

experimental and post-test results was examined in detail to point out the main<br />

differences.<br />

The peak of pressure in the plasma chamber (figs. 3.43 and 3.44) and vacuum vessel,<br />

the most important outcome of the accident analyses, is quite well matched in the<br />

post-test calculations by both ISAS and CONSEN. In all the cases, they showed a<br />

maximum deviation from the experiments within the range of 5%.<br />

The overall results indicate the high accuracy of the ISAS tool in coupling the<br />

different codes for accident analyses. CONSEN proved to be flexible and also<br />

suitable in two-phase flow<br />

conditions. Both the simulation<br />

tools can be considered adequate<br />

for the thermal-hydraulic<br />

applications requested.<br />

CONSEN [3.59] was also<br />

implemented for validation<br />

against the results of the French<br />

EVITA facility (built by CEA,<br />

Cadarache), with the same<br />

satisfactory results.<br />

Pressure (kPa)<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

Exper<br />

Post<br />

Pre<br />

0<br />

0 50 100 150 200<br />

Time (s)<br />

[3.55] ITER Generic Site<br />

Safety Report, ITER<br />

JCT (2001)<br />

[3.56] M.T. Porfiri, P.<br />

Meloni, ISAS post test<br />

calculation for inlet of<br />

coolant experiments,<br />

FUS-TN-SA-SE-R-006<br />

(2001)<br />

[3.54] S. Sandri, EU<br />

Task TW0-SEA2:<br />

Personnel Safety ITER<br />

Task No. G81TD10FE<br />

(D453), FUS-TN-SA-<br />

SE-R-013 (2001)<br />

[3.57] M.T. Porfiri, P.<br />

Meloni ISAS calculations<br />

for inlet of coolant<br />

(ICE) experiments in<br />

2001: pre and post-tests<br />

2a, 2b, 6 and 7, FUS-TN-<br />

SA-SE-R-031 (2001)<br />

[3.58] G. Caruso, M.T.<br />

Porfiri,“CONSEN validation<br />

against ICE –<br />

Experimental campaign<br />

2001 - Post-test calculations<br />

for the cases 2a,<br />

2b, 6 and 7-Post-test<br />

calculations for the<br />

cases 2a, 2b, 6 and 7,<br />

FUS-TN-SA-SE-R-032<br />

(2001)<br />

[3.59] G. Caruso, M.T.<br />

Porfiri, “CONSEN validation<br />

against EVITA -<br />

Experimental campaign<br />

2001 - Post-test calculations”,<br />

FUS-TN-SA-SE-<br />

R-033 (2001)<br />

Fig. 3.43 – Plasma<br />

chamber pressure for ICE<br />

case 6 (CONSEN).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!