23.12.2014 Views

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>1.</strong> MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT<br />

25<br />

[<strong>1.</strong>26] M.J. Mantsinen et<br />

al., ICRF heating<br />

scenarios in JET with<br />

emphasis on 4 He plasmas<br />

for the non-activated<br />

phase of ITER, presented<br />

at the 14 th Topical Conf.<br />

on Radio Frequency Power<br />

in Plasmas (Oxnard 2001),<br />

Vol. 595<br />

[<strong>1.</strong>27] V. G. Kiptily et al.,<br />

Gamma-rays: measurements<br />

and analysis at<br />

JET, presented at the<br />

6 th Inter. Conf. on<br />

Advanced Diagnostics for<br />

Magnetic and Inertial<br />

Fusion (Varenna 2001)<br />

[<strong>1.</strong>28] V. G. Kiptily et al.,<br />

Gamma-rays diagnostics<br />

of energetic ions in<br />

JET, presented at the<br />

7 th IAEA Technical<br />

Committee Meeting on<br />

Energetic Particles in<br />

Magnetic Confinement<br />

(Goteborg 2001) to be<br />

published on Nuclear<br />

Fusion<br />

[<strong>1.</strong>29] J. Mailloux,et al.,<br />

Progress in internal<br />

transport barrier plasmas<br />

with lower hybrid current<br />

drive and heating in JET<br />

accepted for publication<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

I p (MA)<br />

-2<br />

n e (1020<br />

1<br />

m-2)<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

T<br />

2 i (10 keV)<br />

<strong>1.</strong>5<br />

1<br />

T e (eV)<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

Power (10 kW)<br />

<strong>1.</strong>5<br />

LH<br />

1 #53429<br />

0.5<br />

40<br />

45<br />

Time (s)<br />

Gamma diagnostics on JET<br />

<strong>1.</strong>1 Tokamak Physics<br />

Studies of fast-ion production during heating and the subsequent fast-ion behaviour<br />

in <strong>magnetic</strong>ally confined plasma, and evaluations of the resulting bulk ion heating<br />

efficiency are essentially important to fusion reactor development.<br />

Gamma-ray emission from nuclear reactions between fast ions and the main plasma<br />

impurities was observed during ICRH and NBI heating in the JET tokamak. Gammaray<br />

energy spectra provided information on the energy distribution function of the<br />

fast ions. The gamma-ray emission profiles obtained with the JET neutron profile<br />

monitor supplied information on the spatial distribution of reaction sites.<br />

In recent JET studies of the ITER-like ICRH scenarios ( 3 He)D and ( 3 He) 4 He,<br />

gamma-ray measurements gave invaluable information on the fast-ion population:<br />

a) first evidence for ICRF-induced pinch of 3 He-minority ions based on profile data;<br />

b) variation in the fast 3 He tail temperature that depends on 3 He concentration and<br />

c) experimental simulation of 3.5-MeV fusion-born alpha particles by diagnosing fast<br />

4 He ions accelerated to the MeV range [<strong>1.</strong>26,<strong>1.</strong>27,<strong>1.</strong>28].<br />

Effect of low <strong>magnetic</strong> shear induced by LHCD on high-performance ITBs in<br />

JET<br />

In JET a low/negative <strong>magnetic</strong> shear profile is maintained in a plasma target with<br />

2.4-MA plasma current by using 2.2 MW of lower hybrid power combined with NBI<br />

and ICRH. In this scenario, an ITB up to about 4 s is produced. The fraction of LH<br />

driven current is about 25% of the total plasma current. During LH power<br />

application, the layer with reversed shear q-profile can be maintained in a suitable<br />

radial position to inhibit the onset of turbulence, which might otherwise force the ITB<br />

to collapse. Lower hybrid power could be used to drive moderate amounts of noninductive<br />

off-axis current and sustain high-performance ITBs at high plasma current.<br />

The main plasma parameters and additional heating power time traces of two<br />

discharges of JET [<strong>1.</strong>29] are compared in figure <strong>1.</strong>18. In shot #53432, an increase in the<br />

central ion and electron temperatures is observed in the time range from 45.4 s to<br />

46.8 s. In shot #53429 the central temperatures show a prompt increase at the switchon<br />

of LH power, during the main heating phase. The increase is maintained for<br />

longer (3.2 s, from 45.8 s to 49.6 s). In both shots, the temperature rise is accompanied<br />

by a peaking of the temperature profiles, which suggests<br />

the formation of an ITB. The ITB collapse is accompanied<br />

a) by increased plasma-edge interaction, which produces<br />

an increase in Dα emission and the loss of LH antenna<br />

power coupling. On the other hand, in shot #53432 the<br />

b) ITB duration appears to be only <strong>1.</strong>2 s (from t=45.3 s to<br />

NBI<br />

#53429<br />

ICRH e)<br />

#53429<br />

c)<br />

d)<br />

Fig. <strong>1.</strong>18 - Time traces of the main plasma parameters<br />

of JET discharge #53429 compared with a similar<br />

shot (#53432) without LHCD coupling in the main<br />

heating phase. Plasma current: a) # 53429 red curve,<br />

#53432 pink. Line integrated plasma density: b)<br />

#53429 red curve, #53432 black. Central ion<br />

temperature: frame c) #53429 dashed/red, #53432<br />

continuous line/pink. Central electron temperature:<br />

d) #53429 squares/red, #53432 rhombus/pink e)<br />

NBI power, #53429 red, #53432 blue; ICRH power,<br />

#53429 pink, #53432 yellow; LHCD power, #53429<br />

green, #53432 black.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!