1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione
1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione
1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
46<br />
<strong>1.</strong> MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT<br />
<strong>1.</strong>3 Plasma Theory<br />
present parameters, i.e., at r/a=0.2, 2<br />
0.6<br />
s≡rq’/q=-0.58, q=4.4, α H ≡-R 0 q 2 (dβ/dr), <strong>1.</strong>5<br />
0.4<br />
∆’=0.125, α H =0.515, β H =0.0072, 1<br />
η H =0.395, ν H /ν A =0.43, ρ LH /a=0.019.<br />
0.5<br />
0.2<br />
The fast ion tail distribution function is<br />
0<br />
Maxwelllian in energy, with a pitch<br />
0<br />
angle distribution highly peaked around<br />
-0.5<br />
-0.2<br />
µB 0 /E=1, µ being the <strong>magnetic</strong> moment. -1<br />
Results for the growth rate and the -<strong>1.</strong>5 -0.4<br />
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />
mode frequency of the EPM are shown<br />
r/a<br />
in figure <strong>1.</strong>43. It is evident that the range<br />
of unstable mode numbers corresponds well to the experimentally observed modes.<br />
The reason why the mode can be considered a resonantly excited EPM and not a<br />
toroidal Alfvén eigenmode (TAE) is given by the strength of the growth rate, which<br />
is comparable with the gap width. A more articulated explanation of this<br />
interpretation is provided in [<strong>1.</strong>66].<br />
Consider modes localised near<br />
0 1 2 3 4<br />
r 0 (for the present parameters 0.05<br />
0.6<br />
r 0 /a=0.49), where q has a<br />
minimum given by q 0 .<br />
0.04<br />
Consider also a given toroidal<br />
mode number n and a poloidal<br />
0.4<br />
mode number m such that the 0.03<br />
normalised parallel wave<br />
vectors Ω A,m =nq 0 -m0. It is then<br />
0.2<br />
readily demonstrated that the<br />
condition under which<br />
0.01<br />
continuum damping is<br />
minimised is that with 0.00<br />
0.0<br />
–1/2