23.12.2014 Views

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. FUSION TECHNOLOGY 77<br />

3.5 Neutronics<br />

Fig. 3.12 - Measured dose<br />

rate in the cavity centre.<br />

[3.33] P. Batistoni et al.,<br />

Experimental validation<br />

of shutdown dose rate<br />

experiment. Final report<br />

of ITER Task T-426,<br />

FUS-TN-SB-NE-R-002<br />

(2001)<br />

[3.34] P. Batistoni et al.,<br />

Fusion Eng. Des. 58-59,<br />

613 (2001)<br />

[3.35] P. Batistoni et al.,<br />

Benchmark experiment<br />

for the validation of shut<br />

down activation and dose<br />

calculation in a fusion<br />

device, presented at the<br />

Int. Conf. on Nuclear<br />

data for Science and<br />

Technology (ND2001) and<br />

accepted for publication<br />

in J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.<br />

Sv/h<br />

10-3<br />

10-4<br />

10-5<br />

10-6<br />

Background inside the cavity<br />

Measured dose rate (G-M)<br />

Measured dose rate (TLD)<br />

Background dose rate in the cavity<br />

1 day 7 day 1 month<br />

10-7<br />

+ + +<br />

10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100<br />

Time after irradiation (years)<br />

assembly was irradiated<br />

long enough<br />

to create a sufficiently<br />

high level of activation<br />

for monitoring by<br />

dosimeters and other<br />

radiation detectors<br />

after shutdown. Provision<br />

was made for<br />

the cooling time<br />

assumed necessary<br />

before allowing<br />

personnel access. The<br />

objective of the<br />

experiment was to<br />

validate the present<br />

dose rate calculations in a typical and complex shield geometry. It was started in 2000<br />

and completed in 2001 in collaboration with the Technical University of Dresden<br />

(TUD) and Forschungszentrum of Karlsruhe (FZK).<br />

The mockup was irradiated with 14-MeV neutrons for three days at the FNG. The<br />

resulting dose rate was measured for about four months of cooling time by two<br />

independent experimental techniques (fig. 3.12). Other useful measurements, such as<br />

the neutron spectrum, decay gamma-ray spectrum, dose-rate distribution and some<br />

relevant activation reaction rates inside the mockup, were performed [3.33-3.35].<br />

The experiment was then analysed with a rigorous, two-step method (R2S), i.e.,<br />

using the neutron transport code MCNP-4C and the activation code FISPACT, and a<br />

direct, one-step method (D1S), approximate but more straightforward, with an ad<br />

hoc modified version of MCNP used in the nuclear analysis of ITER. The FENDL-2<br />

nuclear data libraries (FENDL/MC-2 for the neutron flux calculation and<br />

FENDL/A-2 for the activation calculation), which are the ITER reference libraries,<br />

were used for both methods. The European libraries EFF/EAF-2001 and the Japanese<br />

libraries JENDL-FF/JENDL-3.2(A) were used with R2S.<br />

The analysis showed that the dose rate measurement inside the mockup is well<br />

predicted by R2S and by all the nuclear data library packages: in the comparison in<br />

figure 3.13, all the computed vs. experimental (C/E) values are close to unity within<br />

the total uncertainty, with the exception of some under-estimations found at about 1<br />

day of decay time.<br />

Fig. 3.13 - C/E dose rate<br />

in the cavity centre.<br />

C/E<br />

<strong>1.</strong>6<br />

R2S/EFF/EAF2001<br />

<strong>1.</strong>4<br />

R2S/EEN-2<br />

R2S/JENDL<br />

D1S (FENDL-2/A)<br />

<strong>1.</strong>2<br />

<strong>1.</strong>0<br />

8 . 10-1<br />

6 . 10-1<br />

4 . 10-1<br />

10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1<br />

Time after irradiation (years)<br />

100<br />

The approximate<br />

D1S method with<br />

FENDL-2 is also<br />

in good agreement<br />

with<br />

measurements<br />

and gives values<br />

slightly but<br />

systematically<br />

lower than R2S.<br />

This may be due<br />

to the fact that<br />

minor nuclides,<br />

contributing to<br />

the total dose<br />

rate at the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!