23.12.2014 Views

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. FUSION TECHNOLOGY 89<br />

3.7.8 Mechanical characterisation of materials with miniaturised<br />

specimens<br />

Development of the portable flat-top indenter for mechanical characterisation<br />

(FIMEC) continued in 200<strong>1.</strong> Following the achievement of the demonstrative<br />

apparatus for in situ testing, which is based on the use of a 0.7-mm-diam flat<br />

indenter, a portable prototype was designed. Work was also started on developing a<br />

numerical methodology as a comprehensive tool for interpreting the load<br />

penetration curves of different materials.<br />

Two options of the portable FIMEC apparatus were analysed: The first is based<br />

on the same stepping motor and load displacement detection features as used in<br />

the fixed apparatus; the second is more compact and has a different layout, with<br />

an encoder, a small motor and a kinematic chain which drives the indenter tip.<br />

Both solutions are provided with a fixing tool suitable for cylindrical and flat<br />

geometry.<br />

3.8.1 Interaction between lead-lithium alloy and water in DEMOrelevant<br />

conditions (EU Task TTBA-5)<br />

Large water leaks<br />

3.7 Materials<br />

3.8 Liquid Metal Technology and<br />

Hydrogen Effects on Materials<br />

The interaction between molten lead-lithium alloy (in a eutectic composition) and<br />

pressurised water is studied to predict the behaviour of a water-cooled lithium-lead<br />

(WCLL) blanket module in the case of a cooling-tube rupture.<br />

In 2001, three tests (#3,4,5) were conducted at the LIFUS 5 apparatus at <strong>ENEA</strong><br />

Brasimone in thermal-hydraulic conditions similar to those foreseen for the WCLL<br />

DEMO blanket.<br />

In test #3, water was injected into the reaction tank at a pressure of 155 bar with<br />

different values of sub-cooling and different free volumes in the expansion vessel.<br />

The initial liquid metal temperature was fixed at 330°C.<br />

In test #4, the water temperature was fixed at 325°C (corresponding to a water subcooling<br />

of about 20°C), the free volume of the expansion vessel was 5 l and the<br />

duration of water injection was 6 s. After about 2 s from the beginning of the test, the<br />

rupture disk D1 (on the line connecting the expansion vessel to the dump tank)<br />

failed, with subsequent depressurisation of the system. Because of the large amount<br />

of injected water, a significant heat effect was also found; a maximum temperature of<br />

683°C was detected in the upper part of the reaction vessel, with an increase of 353°C<br />

over the initial value.<br />

In test #5, water was injected at 265°C, the compressibility of the system was reduced<br />

by decreasing the free volume in the expansion vessel from 5.0 to 4.0 l and the time<br />

of water injection was increased to 12 s. During the experiment, 3.28 kg of water were<br />

injected into the reaction vessel. A maximum temperature of 525°C was detected in<br />

the upper part of the reaction vessel, about 10 s from the beginning of the test, with<br />

an increase of 195°C over the initial value.<br />

Comparing tests #3 and 5, it appears that the free volume in the expansion vessel is<br />

much more significant than the water enthalpy in determining the pressurisation<br />

evolution of the blanket module. This consideration is confirmed by comparing tests<br />

#4 and 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!