1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione
1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione
1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. FUSION TECHNOLOGY 73<br />
3.4 Magnets<br />
Fig. 3.9 - NbTi critical<br />
current curves I c (B,T).<br />
Ic(A)<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
T = 4.2K<br />
Ic fit TWENTE<br />
Ic TWENTE<br />
Ic magn<br />
Ic <strong>ENEA</strong><br />
Ic fit CEA<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />
B(T)<br />
<strong>magnetic</strong> fields up to 10 T. The<br />
system was periodically<br />
calibrated using a nickel<br />
sample with the same NbTi<br />
strand shape. Magnetisation<br />
cycles not only provide a<br />
measurement of AC losses<br />
during external <strong>magnetic</strong> field<br />
cycles but also allow<br />
determination of the critical<br />
current; the critical current<br />
density J c (B,T) is related to the<br />
magnetisation cycle amplitude<br />
∆M(T,B).<br />
A basic difference between<br />
transport and magnetisation Jc<br />
measurement lies in the<br />
presence of the transport current, which modifies the field penetrating the sample.<br />
For comparison purposes, I c (T,B ext ) data have, therefore, to be referred to an<br />
external applied field.<br />
Critical temperatures were determined by the “half-of-full resistance” criterion of the<br />
resistive transition, at 0 and 5 T, using a 3-cm-long wire sample. A 50-mA current was<br />
applied, which resulted in very sharp transitions.<br />
The transport I c (B) data measured on the same strand by Twente University and<br />
CEA were compared with data obtained by <strong>ENEA</strong>. Figure 3.9 shows the NbTi critical<br />
current curves I c (B,T) of CEA and Twente, together with <strong>ENEA</strong>’s experimental I c<br />
data for both magnetisation and transport measurements. The agreement is quite<br />
good in the field range from 4 to 8 T, while at very low field, the magnetisation Ic are<br />
larger than those from the transport measurement.<br />
Configuration and experimental programme of <strong>ENEA</strong> SExUp<br />
One of the most interesting results obtained during the testing of the ITER model<br />
coils was that the slope of the critical current curve of the CIC conductor seemed to<br />
be reduced compared with that of the single Nb 3 Sn strands. Two different<br />
hypotheses have been proposed: the first takes into account a possible uneven<br />
current distribution across the cable; the second starts from possible damage caused<br />
to the strand by Lorentz forces.<br />
A NbTi superconducting magnet is scheduled to be tested in conditions as close as<br />
possible to those foreseen for the ITER poloidal field coils. To investigate the effect of<br />
uneven current distribution on CIC conductors, an innovative electrical joint was<br />
added to this magnet. This configuration will make it possible to force a controllable,<br />
measurable, uneven current distribution in the conductor and to evaluate the effect<br />
of the current distribution on the magnet. A new set of very accurate flow meters will<br />
be used to evaluate the helium flow during fast transients and its effect on stability.<br />
[3.27] P. Bellucci et al.,<br />
Stability dependence on<br />
flow in a CICC, to be<br />
published in Physica C<br />
Dedicated voltage taps will be used to measure inter-strand resistivity as a function<br />
of the number of charge/discharge cycles.<br />
Interpretation of SExUp results<br />
Analysis of the stability-experiment data addressed two main topics: magnet<br />
stability dependence vs. helium flow [3.27] and AC loss evaluation.