23.12.2014 Views

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. FUSION TECHNOLOGY 73<br />

3.4 Magnets<br />

Fig. 3.9 - NbTi critical<br />

current curves I c (B,T).<br />

Ic(A)<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

T = 4.2K<br />

Ic fit TWENTE<br />

Ic TWENTE<br />

Ic magn<br />

Ic <strong>ENEA</strong><br />

Ic fit CEA<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />

B(T)<br />

<strong>magnetic</strong> fields up to 10 T. The<br />

system was periodically<br />

calibrated using a nickel<br />

sample with the same NbTi<br />

strand shape. Magnetisation<br />

cycles not only provide a<br />

measurement of AC losses<br />

during external <strong>magnetic</strong> field<br />

cycles but also allow<br />

determination of the critical<br />

current; the critical current<br />

density J c (B,T) is related to the<br />

magnetisation cycle amplitude<br />

∆M(T,B).<br />

A basic difference between<br />

transport and magnetisation Jc<br />

measurement lies in the<br />

presence of the transport current, which modifies the field penetrating the sample.<br />

For comparison purposes, I c (T,B ext ) data have, therefore, to be referred to an<br />

external applied field.<br />

Critical temperatures were determined by the “half-of-full resistance” criterion of the<br />

resistive transition, at 0 and 5 T, using a 3-cm-long wire sample. A 50-mA current was<br />

applied, which resulted in very sharp transitions.<br />

The transport I c (B) data measured on the same strand by Twente University and<br />

CEA were compared with data obtained by <strong>ENEA</strong>. Figure 3.9 shows the NbTi critical<br />

current curves I c (B,T) of CEA and Twente, together with <strong>ENEA</strong>’s experimental I c<br />

data for both magnetisation and transport measurements. The agreement is quite<br />

good in the field range from 4 to 8 T, while at very low field, the magnetisation Ic are<br />

larger than those from the transport measurement.<br />

Configuration and experimental programme of <strong>ENEA</strong> SExUp<br />

One of the most interesting results obtained during the testing of the ITER model<br />

coils was that the slope of the critical current curve of the CIC conductor seemed to<br />

be reduced compared with that of the single Nb 3 Sn strands. Two different<br />

hypotheses have been proposed: the first takes into account a possible uneven<br />

current distribution across the cable; the second starts from possible damage caused<br />

to the strand by Lorentz forces.<br />

A NbTi superconducting magnet is scheduled to be tested in conditions as close as<br />

possible to those foreseen for the ITER poloidal field coils. To investigate the effect of<br />

uneven current distribution on CIC conductors, an innovative electrical joint was<br />

added to this magnet. This configuration will make it possible to force a controllable,<br />

measurable, uneven current distribution in the conductor and to evaluate the effect<br />

of the current distribution on the magnet. A new set of very accurate flow meters will<br />

be used to evaluate the helium flow during fast transients and its effect on stability.<br />

[3.27] P. Bellucci et al.,<br />

Stability dependence on<br />

flow in a CICC, to be<br />

published in Physica C<br />

Dedicated voltage taps will be used to measure inter-strand resistivity as a function<br />

of the number of charge/discharge cycles.<br />

Interpretation of SExUp results<br />

Analysis of the stability-experiment data addressed two main topics: magnet<br />

stability dependence vs. helium flow [3.27] and AC loss evaluation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!