1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione
1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione
1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. FUSION TECHNOLOGY 103<br />
3.12 Safety and Environment, Power<br />
Plant Studies and Socio-Economics<br />
800<br />
Neutron transport and materials activation<br />
Pressure (kPa)<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
ISAS pre-test<br />
Experiment<br />
ISAS post-test<br />
The code package updating, completed in November<br />
2000, was released to the OECD-NEA Data Bank.<br />
Validation of the ANITA-2000 code package continued<br />
[3.60, 3.61] by comparing calculations with the<br />
experiments performed at the Fusion Neutronics Source<br />
(FNS), JAERI, Tokai, Japan.<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
Time (s)<br />
Fig. 3.44 – Plasma chamber pressure for ICE case<br />
7 (ISAS).<br />
The material samples were irradiated by a 14-MeV<br />
neutron flux in two series lasting 5 min and 7 h,<br />
respectively. The neutron energy spectrum and neutron<br />
source intensity of the experimental irradiation, as well as<br />
the sample compositions, were provided by JAERI. A 175<br />
energy-level neutron flux distribution was considered.<br />
[3.60] D.G. Cepraga, G.<br />
Cambi, M. Frisoni,<br />
ANITA-2000 activation<br />
code package. Part II :<br />
code validation, <strong>ENEA</strong><br />
FUS-TN-SA-SE-R-020<br />
(2001)<br />
[3.61] D.G. Cepraga et al.,<br />
Decay heat estimate for<br />
fusion relevant materials<br />
based on EAF-99 and<br />
FENDL/A-2 libraries in<br />
comparison with FNS-<br />
Jaeri experiments, EFF-<br />
DOC-797, EFF/EAF<br />
Monitoring Meeting,<br />
NEA-OECD (Paris 2001)<br />
The European Activation File EAF99, the Fusion Evaluated Nuclear Data Library<br />
FENDL/A-2) and the decay data library for fusion applications FENDL/D-2 were<br />
used.<br />
Tables 3.VI and 3.VII summarise the experiment-calculation comparison, by range of<br />
discrepancies, for the 5-m and the 7-h irradiation scenarios, respectively, and for both<br />
activation libraries.<br />
As a general conclusion, it can be observed that, for the experimental irradiation<br />
scenario analysed, EAF99 generally provides a better agreement with the experiment<br />
than FENDL/A-2.<br />
Table 3.VI - Summary of calculation-experiment comparison (C-E)/E for<br />
samples irradiated for 5 min.<br />
(C-E)/E EAF99 FENDL/A-2<br />
50 % B4C, BaCO 3 , Bi, Cr, Na 2 CO 3 , B4C, BaCO 3 , Bi, CaO, Cr,<br />
SiO 2 , Y2O 3 Na 2 CO 3 , SiO 2 , Ta, Y2O 3<br />
Table 3.VII - Summary of calculation-experiment comparison (C-E)/E for<br />
samples irradiated for 7 h<br />
(C-E)/E EAF99 FENDL/A-2<br />
< 10% Co,Mn, Nb, NiCr, Ni, Re, S, SrCO 3 , Co, Mn, Nb, NiCr, Ni, Re, S, SrCO 3 ,<br />
SS-304, Ti, Zr, Inconel, SS-316 SS-304, Ti, Zr, Inconel, SS-316<br />
10 to 50<br />
%<br />
BaCO 3 , CaO, Fe, Mo, Na 2 CO 3 ,<br />
SnO2, Ta, V,Y 2 O 3 , Cu<br />
BaCO 3 , CaO, Fe, Mo, Na 2 CO 3 ,<br />
SnO 2 , V, Y 2 O 3 , Cu<br />
> 50 % Al, Bi, Cr, K 2 CO 3 , Pb Al, Bi, Cr, K 2 CO 3 , Pb, Ta