23.12.2014 Views

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34<br />

<strong>1.</strong> MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT<br />

<strong>1.</strong>2 FTU Facilities<br />

temperature profile is obtained by<br />

assuming a Maxwellian distribution,<br />

and then this temperature profile is<br />

used to compute the expected<br />

emission spectra for different<br />

observation angles, these spectra<br />

overestimate the actual radiation<br />

temperature, if the distribution<br />

function is not Maxwellian.<br />

The temperature profiles measured<br />

during an ECH pulse by the Michelson<br />

interferometer (for φ=0°) and by the<br />

radiometer (for φ=10°) are compared in<br />

figure <strong>1.</strong>27. The radiometer was<br />

calibrated using the Michelson<br />

temperature in the Ohmic phase of the<br />

discharge, when the temperature<br />

profile is rather flat and the<br />

distribution function nearly<br />

Maxwellian. The peak of the<br />

temperature profile measured with the<br />

radiometer shows the characteristic<br />

frequency upshift due to the Doppler<br />

effect. The radiometer peak is also<br />

thinner than the Michelson peak, due<br />

to better instrumental resolution. For a<br />

more direct interpretation of the<br />

experiment, the perpendicular<br />

emission should also be measured<br />

with the radiometer. Unfortunately,<br />

these spectra are not available because<br />

stray radiation from the gyrotron<br />

cannot be effectively filtered for φ=0°.<br />

Therefore, the perpendicular spectra of<br />

the radiometer were simulated, first<br />

deriving the temperature profile over<br />

this frequency range from the<br />

Michelson spectra (assuming a<br />

Maxwellian distribution) and then<br />

computing the corresponding spectra<br />

of the radiometer for φ=0° and 10°.<br />

(This is the same procedure as that<br />

followed to obtain the results of figure<br />

<strong>1.</strong>26, but now using the experimental<br />

Michelson spectrum.) In the<br />

calculations, the nominal instrumental<br />

resolution of the two diagnostics was<br />

0<br />

240 260 280 300 320<br />

Frequency (GHz)<br />

used. Figure <strong>1.</strong>28 summarises the result. The perpendicular spectrum of the<br />

radiometer is both higher and thinner than the corresponding spectrum of the<br />

interferometer, due to the better instrumental resolution of the former. The computed<br />

oblique spectrum (assuming a Maxwellian distribution) is higher than the measured<br />

spectrum, in qualitative agreement with the discrepancy expected when the<br />

distribution function has a non-Maxwellian bulk (fig. <strong>1.</strong>25). Further experimental<br />

investigation is needed to confirm this conclusion and to test the quantitative<br />

agreement with the theory.<br />

Tradiation (keV)<br />

Tradiation (keV)<br />

Tradiation (keV)<br />

12<br />

10<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Maxw.<br />

FP<br />

Fig. <strong>1.</strong>26<br />

Michelson<br />

# 19462<br />

0° 10°<br />

20°<br />

Radiometer<br />

Radiom.<br />

0.134 s<br />

0.124 s<br />

0.1 s<br />

0<br />

220 240 260 280 300 320 340<br />

Frequency (GHz)<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Maxw.<br />

Radiom.<br />

Maxw.<br />

Michelson<br />

0°<br />

10°<br />

Exp.<br />

Michelson<br />

0<br />

240 260 280 300 320<br />

Frequency (GHz)<br />

Exp.<br />

Radiom.<br />

Fig. <strong>1.</strong>26 - Angular<br />

dependence of emission<br />

spectra computed for a<br />

non-Maxwellian bulk (FP)<br />

and for the temperature<br />

profile which, assuming a<br />

Maxwellian distribution,<br />

gives an identical spectrum<br />

over this frequency<br />

range for φ=0°. (Instrumental<br />

parameters of the<br />

radiometer).<br />

Fig. <strong>1.</strong>27 - Measured ECE<br />

spectra from perpendicular<br />

(φ=0°, Michelson)<br />

and oblique ECE (φ=10°,<br />

radiometer) during<br />

central ECH.<br />

Fig. <strong>1.</strong>28 - Measured<br />

spectra at τ=0.134 s and<br />

simulated spectra for the<br />

radiometer instrumental<br />

parameters (φ=0°, 10°),<br />

computed with the temperature<br />

profile obtained<br />

over this frequency range<br />

from the interferometer<br />

and assuming a Maxwellian<br />

distribution. Compare<br />

with the angular dependence<br />

in fig. <strong>1.</strong>26.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!