23.12.2014 Views

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

1. magnetic confinement - ENEA - Fusione

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. FUSION TECHNOLOGY 109<br />

The cooling tubes inside the breeding blanket will be subjected to neutron-induced<br />

sputtering, which is the primary contributor to cooling system maintenance doses.<br />

The total cooling system dose was estimated to be of the order of 290 p-mSv/a.<br />

Therefore, a self-cooled liquid-metal blanket, for example, which eliminates the need<br />

for cooling tubes, would significantly reduce cooling system maintenance doses.<br />

Waste management<br />

3.12 Safety and Environment, Power<br />

Plant Studies and Socio-Economics<br />

[3.81] A. Natalizio, L. Di<br />

Pace, Assessment of<br />

clearance and recycling<br />

from the policy point of<br />

view, in preparation<br />

[3.82] A. Natalizio, L. Di<br />

Pace, Tritium transport<br />

and proliferation issues,<br />

in preparation<br />

Assessment of clearance and recycling from the policy viewpoint [3.81]. A valid<br />

analogy exists between in-vessel components that need to be replaced on a regular<br />

basis and used fission reactor fuel, even if there are significant differences in the type<br />

of waste and radiotoxicity. The fission power industry has followed two basic<br />

strategies for used fuel disposal: the once-through fuel cycle and the closed-fuel<br />

cycle, which includes reprocessing of the used fuel. These two strategies are also<br />

available to the future fusion power industry. The key question is to determine the<br />

technical and economic feasibility of used, in-vessel component (IVC) refurbishment<br />

and reprocessing. Seven scenarios were developed and studied to identify the factors<br />

that are important in the development of a suitable fusion-power waste management<br />

strategy dealing with the interim storage, refurbishment/reprocessing, and final<br />

disposal of waste. The scenarios studied range from doing very little<br />

refurbishment/reprocessing to doing the maximum refurbishing/reprocessing that<br />

is practical, both on-site and off-site. The key criterion in evaluating the various<br />

scenarios was the environmental acceptability of the fusion power plant. More<br />

specifically, the aim was to identify scenarios that would eliminate or reduce the<br />

shipment of radioactive materials to and from centralised fuel reprocessing facilities.<br />

The following conclusions were drawn from the study:<br />

<strong>1.</strong> Future fusion power plants should be constructed as multi-unit plants with<br />

adjacent in-vessel component refurbishing facilities.<br />

2. Tritium recovery from blanket modules is expected to reduce the cost of IVC<br />

refurbishment.<br />

3. Reprocessing the breeder and neutron multiplier material may not be economical<br />

unless the reprocessing unit cost is significantly lower than a few hundred Euro/kg.<br />

4. Without IVC refurbishing, the operational IVC waste volume will far exceed the<br />

decommissioning waste volume.<br />

Tritium transport and proliferation issues [3.82]. The objective was to analyse the<br />

tritium transport and proliferation issues that could arise from the transport of<br />

considerable quantities of tritium to and from future fusion power plants. These<br />

potential issues were addressed in the context of a mature fusion power industry.<br />

Two aspects were considered: the public safety of tritium shipments (i.e., the<br />

potential for radiation exposure in the event of a shipping accident); and the<br />

proliferation aspects of tritium shipment (i.e., the potential for the hijacking of<br />

tritium shipments by terrorist organisations). Based on simple analyses it was<br />

demonstrated that there will be a need to ship significant quantities of tritium, to and<br />

from a future fusion power plant, on an annual basis. This could be of the order of<br />

10 kg per year.<br />

Tritium has been safely shipped in licensed shipping containers for many years and<br />

without incidents that could constitute a public risk. Current shipping containers in<br />

Canada are designed and licensed to transport 50 g of tritium, but larger containers<br />

have also been considered in past studies, for example for ITER. Considering the<br />

large quantities of tritium to be shipped to and from a future fusion power plant, a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!