03.01.2015 Views

Metrobus Transit Study.pdf - City of St. John's

Metrobus Transit Study.pdf - City of St. John's

Metrobus Transit Study.pdf - City of St. John's

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>St</strong>. John’s Transportation Commission (<strong>Metrobus</strong>) 2011<br />

Market Assessment and <strong>St</strong>rategic Directions <strong><strong>St</strong>udy</strong> – Part C: Assessment <strong>of</strong> Market Opportunities<br />

9.0 EXTERNAL TRENDS<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> national and local trends which may influence future transit use are identified here as<br />

both potential opportunities and challenges for <strong>Metrobus</strong>.<br />

9.1 Opportunities<br />

9.1.1 Ridership and <strong>Transit</strong> Investment are Growing<br />

In many parts <strong>of</strong> the country, public transit is in a stronger position today that it has been since the<br />

1950’s. Ridership is growing, with a record ridership across Canada in 2007 <strong>of</strong> 1.76 billion trips<br />

which was a 3.1 percent increase over 2006 (CUTA <strong>Transit</strong> Vision 2040). The environmental<br />

benefits <strong>of</strong> transit are widely recognized, and transit capital investment by federal and many<br />

provincial governments has surged over the past five years. The provincial investment represents a<br />

recovery from diminished funding in the 1990s, while federal funding for transit projects is a new<br />

phenomenon, increasing from zero in 2001 to $240 million in 2005, and over $600 million in 2007<br />

(CUTA <strong>Transit</strong> Vision 2040). Funding is particularly significant in Ontario, where the provincial<br />

government provides 3 cents a litre from the gas tax to public transit systems. This funding is for<br />

both operating and capital costs and is designed to support ridership growth. Therefore, provincial<br />

funding is considered an addition to (not a replacement <strong>of</strong>) municipal contributions. This type <strong>of</strong><br />

funding has gone a long way to support ridership growth in Ontario.<br />

In Newfoundland Labrador, the province currently does not provide funding for public transit. This<br />

reduces the ability for transit ridership growth through improvements in service. Several policies<br />

and programs <strong>of</strong> the province are related to environmental sustainability but the role that transit can<br />

play in achieving this is not fully appreciated and this has not translated to a financial contribution<br />

toward improved transit operations.<br />

The federal government is directing some gas tax revenues towards infrastructure through a federalprovincial<br />

agreement. However, none <strong>of</strong> this funding was provided to <strong>Metrobus</strong> to support system<br />

expansion/maintenance. <strong>Metrobus</strong> did receive money through the federal Public <strong>Transit</strong> Capital<br />

Trust and has used this money to invest in their new transit garage.<br />

9.1.2 Advanced Technologies<br />

<strong>Transit</strong> has been benefiting from advances in information and communications technologies,<br />

particularly in the areas <strong>of</strong> customer information, fare systems, and service control. Access to the<br />

internet has enabled personalized trip planning to be <strong>of</strong>fered, increasing customer convenience and<br />

reducing operating costs. Access to real-time information through mobile devices has also made the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> transit more convenient (CUTA <strong>Transit</strong> Vision 2040).<br />

<strong>Metrobus</strong> is a transit leader in the adoption <strong>of</strong> new technologies with features such as the M-Card<br />

and a very advanced web site. <strong>Metrobus</strong> recently implemented an online trip planner and also<br />

provides real-time updates via its website and mobile notifications for users. It is important to note<br />

that while technology improvements are important to enhance the users’ experience, it does not<br />

replace the desirable service level improvements (i.e. speed, frequency, hours <strong>of</strong> service) as the key<br />

factors in ridership growth.<br />

Dillon Consulting Limited Page 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!