17.01.2015 Views

Radio Broadcast - 1925, February - 113 Pages ... - VacuumTubeEra

Radio Broadcast - 1925, February - 113 Pages ... - VacuumTubeEra

Radio Broadcast - 1925, February - 113 Pages ... - VacuumTubeEra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The International <strong>Radio</strong> <strong>Broadcast</strong> Test, 1924 677<br />

Marconi, when he hoisted his kite aerial near<br />

St. Johns, Nova Scotia, on December 6, 1901,<br />

used twenty-five kilowatts of power in trying<br />

to push the historic letter S across the stormy<br />

reaches of the Atlantic. The English and<br />

Continental broadcast pioneers, A. D. 1924,<br />

were using five hundred watts, less than one<br />

fiftieth of that power! It took Marconi weeks<br />

of effort to record the signal S, with no other<br />

obstacles but natural ones and the crude receiving<br />

apparatus at his command. North<br />

American listeners were trying to hear foreign<br />

programs with receiving sets of advanced<br />

design, it is true, but against great odds.<br />

Your listener, in 1924 not only had the<br />

difficulty of unusually unfavorable natural<br />

conditions, but he had to cope with man-made<br />

interference which is well-nigh impossible to<br />

overcome, in the form of squeals and howls<br />

from improperly designed and operated receivers,<br />

which were so pernicious in almost<br />

every locality you could name, that receiving<br />

with any great degree of success was nearly<br />

impossible.<br />

It is safe to say that every one of the broadcasting<br />

stations in Europe and England was<br />

heard at one time or another during the tests<br />

while but few of the American stations were<br />

heard abroad. Those that were heard were<br />

using power considerably above the average.<br />

Inasmuch as the average European transmitter<br />

is not capable of any greater range than the<br />

transmitters used here, it seems reasonable to<br />

assume that our receivers are more sensitive<br />

than those used by the average listener in<br />

foreign countries. It will be remembered that<br />

but few of the European stations were heard<br />

in this country last year, which would seem<br />

to indicate that we have improved our receivers<br />

very materially during the past twelve<br />

months. Within the next year one can<br />

assume that additional improvements will be<br />

made in receiver design. It is also probable<br />

that high-power broadcasting stations, now<br />

being seriously considered, will result in much<br />

better reception of our programs by foreign<br />

listeners.<br />

When a receiver is made more sensitive, it<br />

more susceptible to interference as well as<br />

is<br />

more responsive to the signal desired.<br />

It may,<br />

therefore, be desirable to use greater power<br />

for broadcasting of this nature. Then, too,<br />

there is the possibility of broadcasting on short<br />

waves for the purpose or rebroadcasting in a<br />

distant locality or foreign country. A very excellent<br />

indication of the progress being made<br />

in this direction may be seen from the success<br />

with which the programs from KDKA, the<br />

Pittsburgh station of<br />

the Westingho'USe<br />

Electric and Manufacturing<br />

Company<br />

were re-broadcast by<br />

the British <strong>Broadcast</strong>ing<br />

Company<br />

during the tests.<br />

THE RADIO PARIS<br />

STATION AT PARIS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!