17.01.2015 Views

Radio Broadcast - 1925, February - 113 Pages ... - VacuumTubeEra

Radio Broadcast - 1925, February - 113 Pages ... - VacuumTubeEra

Radio Broadcast - 1925, February - 113 Pages ... - VacuumTubeEra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Our<br />

HAT<br />

,<br />

Readers<br />

Write Us<br />

A Word from an Enemy<br />

of the Single Circuit<br />

IT IS growing more and more plain that the<br />

enemies of the single-circuit receiver are<br />

legion and are increasing in numbers and in<br />

intensity of their opposition. As has often<br />

been remarked about the unfortunate widespread<br />

use of the single circuit set, abolishing it<br />

is so largely a matter of militant public opinion<br />

that results come a bit slowly. RADIO BROAD-<br />

CAST has in the last two years, lost some<br />

"friends" by its constant advocacy of the abolishing<br />

of the radiating receiver, chiefly among<br />

advertisers, be it said. It is interesting to note<br />

that now, very very few single-circuit receivers<br />

are marketed by manufacturers who make<br />

even faint claims to be reputable.<br />

Editor, RADIO BROADCAST<br />

Doubleday, Page & Company,<br />

Garden City, L. I.<br />

DEAR SIR.<br />

I wish to compliment Mr. Willis K. Wing on his<br />

excellent summing up of "The Case Against the<br />

Radiating Receiver," but if it is in order, I would<br />

suggest a final point with which he might have<br />

rounded out his remarks on the single-circuit receiver.<br />

Even if it were not for its severe radiation, the<br />

single-circuit set is not even selective enough<br />

to merit its consideration as a broadcast receiver.<br />

The recent Department of Commerce ruling calling<br />

for a compulsory quiet hour from 7 to 10.30 p. M.<br />

on the part of amateur stations was necessitated by<br />

the fact that at that time the single-circuit was the<br />

commonest type of receiver in use. This was not on<br />

account of the fact that amateur continuous wave<br />

stations actually created interference themselves,<br />

but simply because the single-circuit users were not<br />

able to tune the near-by stations out, which is, in a<br />

sense, unfair to the amateur.<br />

This affliction of broad tuning which also gives<br />

the same trouble when the receiver is in a few miles<br />

of a broadcasting station, is caused by the fact that<br />

when resistance is included in an oscillatory (tuning)<br />

circuit, the tuning of that circuit is made broad. In<br />

the single-circuit tuner, the coil, condenser, and<br />

antenna are all connected together as to form one<br />

circuit, hence the name. Unfortunately, however,<br />

antennas have resistance, and most of those built<br />

for broadcast reception have comparatively high<br />

resistance, so that the antenna being included in the<br />

circuit through which the signals enter the detector<br />

causes the tuning to become broad. When the<br />

tuner is set for a broadcasting station, any other<br />

transmitter being operated in the neighborhood on<br />

almost any other wavelength will be heard, probably<br />

all over the dial.<br />

The remedy for this is to "loose couple" the set;<br />

in other words, to bring the antenna and ground<br />

leads to a separate coil to be coupled to the grid<br />

tuning coil. The honeycomb coil tuner is the outstanding<br />

representative of this method of construction,<br />

and the so-called three-circuit regenerator<br />

as well.<br />

H. S. G., Kitchener, Ontario.<br />

A <strong>Radio</strong> Samaritan<br />

TT IS most interesting to notice how the<br />

1<br />

gospel is reaching all through the country<br />

and how the feeling against the squealing or<br />

radiating receiver has taken practical form.<br />

People, wherever possible, are getting to do<br />

something about this unfortunate situation<br />

rather than merely holding forth at great<br />

wordy length.<br />

Editor, RADIO BROADCAST<br />

Doubleday, Page & Company,<br />

Garden City, L. I.<br />

DEAR SIR.<br />

Since reading your article "The Case Against the<br />

Radiating Receiver" in the October RADIO BROAD-<br />

CAST, I came across this notice in our local paper.<br />

B. N., Gloucester, Massachusetts.<br />

RADIO CONDITIONS IN G1OUCESTEB LAST NIGHT<br />

Conditions were good last night. Most stations came through<br />

strong. There was very little fading and static. R. P. M.<br />

WARNING<br />

If the person in the vicinity of Center Street who tunes in<br />

morning, noon and night and never gets the station clear'without<br />

squealing, will please call at my shop, 101 Main St., with his or<br />

her radio set. I will make the necessary adjustments and<br />

changes in the set free of charge, so that above party will enjoy<br />

his radio more, and others in this neighborhood may enjoy theirs<br />

also.<br />

R. P. MERCHANT.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!