27.01.2015 Views

Women in Latin America and the Caribbean - Cepal

Women in Latin America and the Caribbean - Cepal

Women in Latin America and the Caribbean - Cepal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56<br />

despite some positive <strong>and</strong> encourag<strong>in</strong>g trends, progress (albeit irreversible) has been very slow. There is<br />

less agreement about <strong>the</strong> causes of cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>the</strong> importance of women’s work <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

reasons for promot<strong>in</strong>g it. If women’s paid work contributes to development <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> family economy, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

why is it not be<strong>in</strong>g encouraged If women have not achieved equality <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> labour market <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

family, is it because of <strong>the</strong>ir own shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs, or because <strong>the</strong>ir education or natural endowments lead<br />

<strong>the</strong>m to give priority to care over paid work<br />

Figure II.1<br />

LATIN AMERICA: WOMEN’S AVERAGE EARNINGS COMPARED TO MEN’S, URBAN AREAS,<br />

OBSERVED VALUES AND PROJECTIONS, 1990-2015<br />

(Percentages)<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

70 71<br />

61<br />

64<br />

78<br />

85 87<br />

68 68 70<br />

1988<br />

1989<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

2017<br />

Observed labour <strong>in</strong>come Observed wage <strong>in</strong>come Estimated labour <strong>in</strong>come<br />

Estimated wage <strong>in</strong>come<br />

Target<br />

Source: Economic Commission for Lat<strong>in</strong> <strong>America</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong> (ECLAC), “Gender statistics” [onl<strong>in</strong>e]<br />

http://www.eclac.cl/mujer/proyectos/perfiles_en/comparados/trabajo12.htm, on <strong>the</strong> basis of special tabulations of data<br />

from <strong>the</strong> household surveys of <strong>the</strong> countries concerned.<br />

This study shows that <strong>the</strong> sexual division of labour has been <strong>and</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s a functional part of<br />

economic systems (Benería, 1995; Elson, 1992; Henderson, 1994), s<strong>in</strong>ce it ensures a labour supply<br />

subsidized by <strong>the</strong> work of women, who produce cost-free goods <strong>and</strong> services that would o<strong>the</strong>rwise have<br />

to be provided by <strong>the</strong> market or <strong>the</strong> State. <strong>Women</strong>’s ability to participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> labour market is affected<br />

by what <strong>the</strong> fem<strong>in</strong>ist economist Ingrid Palmer (1992) has called “<strong>the</strong> reproduction tax” aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong><br />

unpaid work <strong>the</strong>y perform <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> home because of an unwritten pact that endorses men as <strong>the</strong> universal<br />

economic providers for <strong>the</strong>ir families <strong>and</strong> women as carers. This is reflected <strong>in</strong> philosophical debates that<br />

credit women with a special moral predisposition for caregiv<strong>in</strong>g. The crux of <strong>the</strong> matter is that women are<br />

associated with <strong>the</strong> care ethic <strong>and</strong> with a “natural” predisposition to give primacy to <strong>in</strong>terpersonal <strong>and</strong><br />

affective networks. From this dichotomous st<strong>and</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t, men are seen as be<strong>in</strong>g more <strong>in</strong>dividualistic <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!