27.01.2015 Views

Women in Latin America and the Caribbean - Cepal

Women in Latin America and the Caribbean - Cepal

Women in Latin America and the Caribbean - Cepal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

76<br />

Figure II.3<br />

LATIN AMERICA (SIMPLE AVERAGE FOR 15 COUNTRIES): FEMALE POPULATION AGED 15<br />

AND OVER, BY OCCUPATION AND YEARS OF EDUCATION, URBAN AREAS, AROUND 2005<br />

(Percentages)<br />

40<br />

35<br />

34<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

14 15 21 22 14<br />

16<br />

20<br />

29<br />

15<br />

19 20 24 24<br />

18<br />

24<br />

27<br />

29<br />

31<br />

18 18 30<br />

10<br />

11<br />

7<br />

5<br />

2<br />

0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r employed<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Total<br />

Housewives<br />

Domestic service<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r employed<br />

Total<br />

Housewives<br />

Domestic service<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r employed<br />

Total<br />

Housewives<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Domestic service<br />

Domestic service<br />

Housewives<br />

Total<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r employed<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Domestic service<br />

Housewives<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Total<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r employed<br />

0 to 3 4 to 6 7 to 9 10 to 12 13 <strong>and</strong> over<br />

Source: Economic Commission for Lat<strong>in</strong> <strong>America</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong> (ECLAC), on <strong>the</strong> basis of special tabulations of household<br />

surveys from <strong>the</strong> countries concerned.<br />

Most women employed on unpaid domestic work (housewives) are married or o<strong>the</strong>rwise<br />

cohabit<strong>in</strong>g (75% as aga<strong>in</strong>st 49% for <strong>the</strong> population as a whole) (see figure II.4). <strong>Women</strong> carry<strong>in</strong>g out<br />

unpaid work are more likely than o<strong>the</strong>rs to be liv<strong>in</strong>g with preschool-age children <strong>and</strong> with o<strong>the</strong>r people <strong>in</strong><br />

potential need of care such as older adults, <strong>the</strong> sick <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> disabled (61% live with one or more people<br />

requir<strong>in</strong>g care) (see figure II.5). These data show what is concealed beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> concept of “family<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts”, which <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> need to look after <strong>the</strong> spouse or partner, children <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r dependents<br />

who do not necessarily fall <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> category of <strong>the</strong> sick, <strong>the</strong> disabled or <strong>the</strong> vulnerable receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

benefits of unpaid care. The data also show that women <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r occupations share <strong>the</strong>ir households with<br />

fewer people need<strong>in</strong>g care.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!