uiscZ
uiscZ
uiscZ
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Purple Cow<br />
Case Study: What Should Tide Do<br />
Tide is arguably the best laundry detergent in history.<br />
Every year, Procter & Gamble invests millions of dollars<br />
and pays a top-flight team of chemists to push the performance<br />
of Tide further and further.<br />
Is that the right thing to do<br />
Tide succeeded early on because of a mixture of good<br />
TV ads, very good distribution, and a great product. As<br />
the TV-industrial complex crumbled, though, the ads<br />
mattered less and less. Now, with the ascension of Wal-<br />
Mart, the distribution is more crucial than ever. One<br />
chain of stores accounts for a third of Tide’s sales. Without<br />
Wal-Mart, Tide is dead.<br />
So what should P&G do Are they likely to come up with<br />
a true innovation, a remarkable breakthrough that even<br />
casual detergent buyers notice Or are the incremental<br />
improvements largely a carryover from a different time, a<br />
time when people actually cared about their laundry<br />
Orthodox Purple Cow thinking would have P&G take<br />
the profits while they’re still there. Cut research spending,<br />
raise the price as much as is practical, and put the incremental<br />
profits into the creation of ever more radical and<br />
interesting new products. If the current R&D isn’t likely to<br />
generate a noteworthy payoff, what’s the point<br />
If a product’s future is unlikely to be remarkable<br />
– if you can’t imagine a future in which people<br />
are once again fascinated by your product – it’s<br />
time to realize that the game has changed. Instead<br />
of investing in a dying product, take profits and<br />
reinvest them in building something new.<br />
27