The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)
The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)
The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2. <strong>The</strong> new scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong> <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>law</strong>: Euro-crime and narratives<br />
How did these changing structures reflect themselves upon the material body <strong>of</strong> ECL<br />
What themes, rationales or narratives derived from it It will be suggested that an<br />
expanding dynamic continued in this field as the EU formalised intervention in areas not<br />
mentioned by the TEU(M) but in relation to which the legislator had used the ‘umbrella’<br />
<strong>of</strong> the fight against organised crime to intervene. This formalisation occurred, for<br />
example, in relation to organised crime, trafficking in persons, <strong>of</strong>fences against children<br />
and corruption. <strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> organised crime also made its way into Article<br />
29TEU(A). Hence, Article 29 TEU(A) as mentioned earlier in this chapter held that the<br />
<strong>Union</strong>’s objective was to provide citizens with a high level <strong>of</strong> safety within an area <strong>of</strong><br />
freedom, security and justice by developing common action among the Member States<br />
in the fields <strong>of</strong> police and judicial cooperation in <strong>criminal</strong> matters as well as in<br />
combating racism and xenophobia. More specifically, in relation to the domains <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>criminal</strong>ity in which intervention was to take place, Article 29 TEU(A) mentioned crime<br />
- organised or otherwise - such as terrorism, trafficking in persons and <strong>of</strong>fences against<br />
children, illicit drug trafficking and illicit arms trafficking, corruption and fraud. In<br />
relation to harmonisation <strong>of</strong> national <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>law</strong> this provision was complemented by<br />
Article 31(1)(e) TEU(A) which noted that common action should include progressively<br />
adopting measures establishing minimum rules on the constituent elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>criminal</strong><br />
acts and penalties in the fields <strong>of</strong> organised crime, terrorism and drug trafficking.<br />
Nevertheless, as it will be seen below, measures were adopted in domains not directly<br />
mentioned in the TEU(A), such as cyber crime, money laundering, victims’ rights and<br />
environmental crime. <strong>The</strong>se were all areas <strong>of</strong> harmonisation not mentioned in Article<br />
29TEU, let alone in the short list <strong>of</strong> Article 31 (1)(e) (which mentioned organised crime,<br />
terrorism and illicit drug trafficking only).<br />
It will be contended that ECL continued to have, as its focal point, a specific type <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>criminal</strong>ity: Euro-<strong>of</strong>fences. 401 Hence, whilst Euro-crime continued to rest on ideas<br />
around the fight against organised crime (for which there was, at this stage, a clear legal<br />
basis), the narrative <strong>of</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> EC interests and policies via <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>law</strong> was<br />
further enhanced, whereas concerns with fundamental rights (mostly in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
procedural victims’ rights) became more visible, albeit very limited. <strong>The</strong> latter two<br />
themes however, were in a realm <strong>of</strong> uncertain competence for the EU to enact<br />
legislation. This was so, given that the TEU(A) did not directly attribute competence for<br />
the EU to adopt <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>law</strong> measures that aimed at the protection <strong>of</strong> EC interests and<br />
policies or relating to <strong>criminal</strong> procedure.<br />
401 See chapter 2.<br />
113