The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)
The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)
The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
months) to third-country national victims <strong>of</strong> trafficking or to facilitate illegal<br />
immigration for those who cooperate in the fight against trafficking in human beings. 513<br />
Such victims can be entitled to a short-term residence permit as long as they are<br />
cooperating with police investigations or judicial proceedings, manifest a clear<br />
intention to cooperate and have severed all relations with those suspected <strong>of</strong> crimes. 514<br />
If these conditions are not fulfilled – hence when the victim no longer is able or willing<br />
to cooperate with the authorities or in case it re-enacts or does not break ties with hers<br />
or his traffickers – he or she shall be expelled from the <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>. 515 Although<br />
these measures speak directly to the intertwining <strong>of</strong> <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>law</strong> and EU/ EC policies,<br />
and the indirect implications that measures such as the framework decision on<br />
trafficking in human beings have on immigration policies, it is a clear example <strong>of</strong> the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> the victim for prosecutorial benefits to their possible detriment and with<br />
disregard <strong>of</strong> their other fundamental rights. 516<br />
Whilst the protection <strong>of</strong> victims’ rights was settled comfortably in EU legal narratives,<br />
the rights <strong>of</strong> suspects were not yet, at the time, directly acknowledged by a third pillar<br />
instrument. 517 Vogel, for instance, noted how in the system <strong>of</strong> EU <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>law</strong><br />
“the interest <strong>of</strong> the prosecuted person and their defence was clearly neglected. Indeed,<br />
the defence is simply missing from the integrated <strong>European</strong> <strong>criminal</strong> justice system as it<br />
stands now.” 518<br />
Kaiafa-Gbandi remarked that<br />
“…characteristic are not only the divergence from basic <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>law</strong> principles but<br />
also the lack <strong>of</strong> fundamental rights institutional protection within the EU framework,<br />
513 Council Directive 2004/81/EC <strong>of</strong> 29 April 2004 on the residence permit issued to third<br />
country nationals who are victims <strong>of</strong> trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject <strong>of</strong><br />
an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities, OJ<br />
L261/19 [2004].<br />
514 Article 8 (1), ibid..<br />
515 Articles 13 and 14, ibid..<br />
516 For more details see H. Askola, Legal Responses to Trafficking in Women for Sexual<br />
Exploitation in the <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>, supra note 381, 92-95.<br />
517 To be sure, the rights <strong>of</strong> the defendant remained ackowledged and protected at national level<br />
accoridng to Member State’s own rules on <strong>criminal</strong> procedure. Furthermore, For an overview <strong>of</strong><br />
defence rights in a broader <strong>European</strong> context (EU, Council <strong>of</strong> Europe – ECHR and 9 different<br />
national jurisdictions) see E. Cape et al., Effective Criminal Defence in Europe<br />
(Antwerp/Oxford/Portland: Intersentia, 2010) or for a practical perspective, see E. Cape et al.,<br />
Suspects in Europe, Procedural Rights at the Investigative Stage <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Process in the<br />
<strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong> (Antwerp/ Oxford/ Portland: Intersentia, 2007).<br />
518<br />
J. Vogel, “<strong>The</strong> <strong>European</strong> Integrated Criminal Justice System and its Constitutional<br />
Framework” (2005) 12 Maastricht Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong> and Comparative Law 125, 136.<br />
137