09.02.2015 Views

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

economic loss; (e) seizure <strong>of</strong> aircraft, ships or other means <strong>of</strong> public or goods transport;<br />

(f) manufacture, possession, acquisition, transport, supply or use <strong>of</strong> weapons, explosives<br />

or <strong>of</strong> nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, as well as research into, and<br />

development <strong>of</strong>, biological and chemical weapons; (g) release <strong>of</strong> dangerous substances,<br />

or causing fires, floods or explosions the effect <strong>of</strong> which is to endanger human life; (h)<br />

interfering with or disrupting the supply <strong>of</strong> water, power or any other fundamental<br />

natural resource the effect <strong>of</strong> which is to endanger human life; (i) threatening to commit<br />

any <strong>of</strong> the acts listed in (a) to (h).” “Any action involving aggravated theft, extortion or<br />

drawing up false administrative documents with the view <strong>of</strong> committing any <strong>of</strong> the acts<br />

mentioned earlier, shall be considered terrorist linked activities.” 611<br />

Examples <strong>of</strong> proposed academic and legislative approaches to terrorism are useful in<br />

helping to understand how broad and detailed the Framework Decision’s definition is.<br />

Commonly accepted definitions by <strong>law</strong> enforcement agencies, for instance, tend to be<br />

concise and narrower than the EU’s Framework Decision. <strong>The</strong> FBI considers terrorism<br />

“the un<strong>law</strong>ful use <strong>of</strong> force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or<br />

coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment there<strong>of</strong>, in furtherance <strong>of</strong><br />

political or social objectives.”; 612<br />

whereas the CIA defines it as<br />

“premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatant<br />

targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an<br />

audience.” 613<br />

<strong>The</strong> contrast with previous national legislation on the definition <strong>of</strong> terrorism (or lack<br />

<strong>of</strong>) is also sharp. Indeed, before the adoption <strong>of</strong> the Framework Decision only six<br />

Member States <strong>criminal</strong>ised terrorist acts autonomously: France, Germany, Italy,<br />

Portugal, Spain and the UK. 614 All <strong>of</strong> them had narrower definitions than the EU’s.<br />

611 Ibid..<br />

612 Terrorism research centre, at http://www.terrorism-research.com/, visited on 22 November<br />

2011.<br />

613 Title 22 <strong>of</strong> the US Code, Section 2656f(d).<br />

614 Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on combating terrorism, Brussels, 19.9.2001,<br />

COM (2001)521 final, 6 - 7.<br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!