09.02.2015 Views

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

within the scope <strong>of</strong> instruments already adopted for the purpose <strong>of</strong> combating organised<br />

crime…” 438<br />

<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> such a rationale was further expanded to new domains, such as cyber crime.<br />

Indeed, in the preamble <strong>of</strong> the Council Framework Decision on attacks against<br />

information systems it is noted how<br />

“…threats from organised crime and increasing concern at the potential <strong>of</strong> terrorist<br />

attacks against information systems … form part <strong>of</strong> the critical infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Member States. This constitutes a threat to the achievement <strong>of</strong> a safer information<br />

society and <strong>of</strong> an area <strong>of</strong> freedom, security and justice.” 439<br />

Furthermore, the fight against organised crime continues to focus greatly on the<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> the stability <strong>of</strong> the EU’s financial system. <strong>The</strong> Council adopted a<br />

Framework Decision on money laundering; as well as on the identification, tracing,<br />

freezing and confiscation <strong>of</strong> the instruments and the proceeds from crime. 440<br />

Accordingly, the Framework Decision’s preamble declares,<br />

“money laundering is at the very heart <strong>of</strong> organised crime and should be rooted out<br />

wherever it occurs.” 441<br />

<strong>The</strong> emphasis in relation to financial crime is also seen in other measures, namely the<br />

Framework Decision on combating fraud and counterfeiting <strong>of</strong> non-cash means <strong>of</strong><br />

payment. 442 <strong>The</strong> preamble <strong>of</strong> the Framework Decision justifies its adoption with a call<br />

for action via the Action Plan to combat organised crime adopted in 1997 and the<br />

Vienna Action Plan <strong>of</strong> 1998. 443 Likewise, the Framework Decision on confiscation <strong>of</strong><br />

crime related proceeds, instrumentalities and property 444 is deeply related to the fight<br />

against organised crime and is seen throughout its preamble, whose intent (1) states,<br />

“<strong>The</strong> main motive for cross-border organised crime is financial gain. In order to be<br />

effective, therefore, any attempt to prevent and combat such crime must focus on<br />

tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscating the proceeds from crime.”<br />

438 Para (9) <strong>of</strong> the preamble <strong>of</strong> the Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA, supra note 414.<br />

439 Recital (2) and (3) <strong>of</strong> the Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA, supra note 408.<br />

440 Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA, supra note 410.<br />

441 Recital (6), ibid..<br />

442 Council Framework Decision 2001/413/JHA, supra note 411.<br />

443 Intent (3) <strong>of</strong> the Preamble, ibid..<br />

444 Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA <strong>of</strong> 24 February 2005 on Confiscation <strong>of</strong> Crime-<br />

Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property, OJ L 68/49 [2005].<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!