The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)
The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)
The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
matters. Indeed, the <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong> adopted a wide range <strong>of</strong> framework decisions<br />
aiming at harmonising the minimum elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences and penalties at<br />
national level, many <strong>of</strong> which were under the umbrella <strong>of</strong> the fight against organised<br />
crime. 577 <strong>The</strong> range <strong>of</strong> areas involved went considerably beyond the domains referred to<br />
in Article 29 TEU, let alone Article 31 TEU. Hence, framework decisions harmonising<br />
elements <strong>of</strong> national <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>law</strong> were adopted in areas as diverse as illicit drug<br />
trafficking, 578 sexual exploitation <strong>of</strong> children and child pornography, 579 terrorism, 580<br />
fraud and counterfeiting <strong>of</strong> non-cash means <strong>of</strong> payment, 581 money laundering, 582<br />
trafficking in human beings, 583 corruption in the private sector, 584 crime against<br />
information system, 585 and environment, 586 among others.<br />
Furthermore, the fashion according to which the EU legislator set the scope <strong>of</strong> minimum<br />
harmonisation in place was all but minimal. This, it will be contended, can be perceived<br />
in several elements, namely in the choice <strong>of</strong> wide definitions <strong>of</strong> crimes, in the widening<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>criminal</strong> liability to legal persons, in the establishment <strong>of</strong> common minimum<br />
maximum penalties, and generally on the impact those elements have on national legal<br />
orders. Ultimately, it will be seen that the attempt to establish a minimum common<br />
denominator resulted in the setting <strong>of</strong> a higher intensity <strong>of</strong> <strong>criminal</strong>isation namely<br />
through more and wider <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>law</strong> across the <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>.<br />
2. Broad definitions <strong>of</strong> <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences<br />
<strong>The</strong> EU, in seeking to harmonise minimum elements constituent <strong>of</strong> crimes and penalties,<br />
focused first and foremost on the definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences. In this regard, ECL has<br />
showed a tendency to adopt broad definitions <strong>of</strong> crimes hence potentially <strong>criminal</strong>ising a<br />
wider range <strong>of</strong> behaviours than before across the EU. This is clearly seen in the<br />
approach to the harmonisation <strong>of</strong> organised crime. It was seen in previous chapters how<br />
organised crime was <strong>of</strong>ten used as an umbrella concept to allow for intervention in areas<br />
not directly mentioned in the TEU(A) and which could be related to organised crime in a<br />
more direct or indirect way. <strong>The</strong> wide approach to organised crime was further<br />
577 A significant majority <strong>of</strong> these measures came to replace pre-existent joint actions on the same<br />
topics. For an overall view on these see chapter 2.<br />
578 Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA, supra note 415.<br />
579 Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA, supra note 414.<br />
580 Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA, supra note 413.<br />
581 Council Framework Decision 2001/413/JHA, supra note 411.<br />
582 Council Framework Decision 2001/500/ JHA, supra note 410.<br />
583 Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA, supra note 409.<br />
584 Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA, supra note 417.<br />
585 Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA, supra note 408.<br />
586 Council Framework Decision 2003/80/JHA, supra note 463.<br />
157