09.02.2015 Views

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

continued by the Framework Decision on fighting organised crime. 587 <strong>The</strong> Framework<br />

Decision adopts an extensive interpretation <strong>of</strong> organised crime and on the definition <strong>of</strong> a<br />

<strong>criminal</strong> organisation. This reflects a contemporary approach to the phenomenon but<br />

also an impetus to <strong>criminal</strong>ise extensively.<br />

First, the 2008 Framework Decision requires Member States to <strong>criminal</strong>ise one or both<br />

<strong>of</strong>fences <strong>of</strong>, broadly speaking, membership <strong>of</strong> a <strong>criminal</strong> organisation (even if no actual<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence is committed) or the agreement to actively take part in the execution <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences<br />

related to the activities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>criminal</strong> organisation:<br />

“ Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that one or both <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following types <strong>of</strong> conduct related to a <strong>criminal</strong> organisation are regarded as <strong>of</strong>fences:<br />

(a) conduct by any person who, with intent and with the knowledge <strong>of</strong> either the aim and<br />

general activity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>criminal</strong> organisation or its intention to commit the <strong>of</strong>fences in<br />

question, actively takes part in the organisation <strong>of</strong> <strong>criminal</strong> activities, including the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> information or material means, the recruitment <strong>of</strong> new members and all<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> financing <strong>of</strong> its activities, knowing that such a participation will contribute to<br />

the achievement <strong>of</strong> the organisation’s <strong>criminal</strong> activities; (b) conduct by any person<br />

consisting in an agreement with one or more persons that an activity should be pursued,<br />

which if carried out, would amount to the commission <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences referred to in Article<br />

1, even if that person does not take part in the actual execution <strong>of</strong> the activity.” 588<br />

Furthermore, the Framework Decision defines a <strong>criminal</strong> organisation as a:<br />

“structured association, established over a period <strong>of</strong> time, <strong>of</strong> more than two persons<br />

acting in concert with a view <strong>of</strong> committing <strong>of</strong>fences which are punishable by<br />

deprivation <strong>of</strong> liberty or a detention order <strong>of</strong> a maximum <strong>of</strong> at least four years or a more<br />

serious penalty, to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit;”<br />

whilst structured association means “an association that is not randomly formed for the<br />

immediate commission <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence, nor does it need to have formally defined roles for<br />

its members, continuity <strong>of</strong> its membership, or a developed structure.” 589<br />

587 Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA, supra note 416, which came to replace the Joint Action<br />

making it a <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence to participate in a <strong>criminal</strong> organisation, Joint Action 98/733/JHA,<br />

see note 305. For a detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> the Joint Action see V. Mitsilegas, “Defining organised<br />

crime in the <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>”, supra note 432; and for an analysis <strong>of</strong> the Framework Decision<br />

see F. Calderoni, “A Definition that Could not Work”, supra note 270.<br />

588 Article 2 <strong>of</strong> the Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA, note 416.<br />

589 Article 1, ibid..<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!