09.02.2015 Views

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

The evolution of European Union criminal law (1957-2012)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“<strong>The</strong> Commission’s efforts and initiatives in this area have been aimed at making checks<br />

at internal frontiers more flexible, as they cannot be abolished altogether until, in line<br />

with the concerns expressed by the <strong>European</strong> Council, adequate safeguards are<br />

introduced against terrorism and drugs.” 152<br />

Along the same lines, the Schengen Agreement also held that the signatory parties<br />

should,<br />

“…reinforce cooperation between their customs and police authorities, notably in<br />

fighting crime, particularly illicit traffic in drugs and arms, the unauthorised entry and<br />

residence <strong>of</strong> persons and customs and tax fraud and smuggling. To that end and in<br />

accordance with their national <strong>law</strong>s, the Parties shall endeavour to improve the<br />

exchange <strong>of</strong> information and to reinforce it where information likely to be <strong>of</strong> interest to<br />

the other parties in combating crime is concerned.” 153<br />

<strong>The</strong> release <strong>of</strong> these two documents essentially changed the <strong>criminal</strong> <strong>law</strong> related matters<br />

discourse in the <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong> space.<br />

Furthermore, Mitsilegas et al note how, during the 1970s and 1980s, besides the single<br />

market shift, there were increased pressures upon Member States, namely due to an<br />

expansion in<br />

“…drug trafficking, the growth <strong>of</strong> international trade and financial transactions, and<br />

the increasing economic interpenetration in Western Europe led to a spread <strong>of</strong> crossborder<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> organised crime groups almost everywhere in Europe.” 154<br />

Official data available from this time is scarce but Recommendation 1044 <strong>of</strong> the Council<br />

<strong>of</strong> Europe, for example, broadly refers to an,<br />

“…alarming increase in international crime, that is, predominantly organised crime<br />

with international ramifications, in member countries <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> Europe and the<br />

world as a whole”. 155<br />

152<br />

<strong>European</strong> Commission, Completing the Internal Market, supra note 58, para 51.<br />

153 Schengen Agreement, supra note 59, Article 9.<br />

154 V. Mitsilegas, J. Monar and W. Rees, <strong>The</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong> and Internal Security: Guardians<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Treaties (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003) 24-25.<br />

155 Council <strong>of</strong> Europe, Recommendation 1044 (1986) on international crime, Assembly debate on<br />

20 September 1986 (14th Sitting) para 1.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!