Teaching Gender in Social Work - MailChimp
Teaching Gender in Social Work - MailChimp
Teaching Gender in Social Work - MailChimp
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Themes which emerge from this debate <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• The value of an approach which is less generalised and has more<br />
capacity to take <strong>in</strong>to account diversity and difference with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
broad concept of ‘gender’<br />
• The value of an emphasis on the fluidity of identity and<br />
multi-layered analysis of gender<br />
• The risk that the political goal of fem<strong>in</strong>ism gets lost with<strong>in</strong> such<br />
debates<br />
• The limitation that cont<strong>in</strong>ues to exist <strong>in</strong> ‘fem<strong>in</strong>ist’ approaches<br />
<strong>in</strong> terms of how men and mascul<strong>in</strong>ity are <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to<br />
the debate<br />
• The question of how one applies this approach <strong>in</strong> practice<br />
Anti-sexist perspectives are then <strong>in</strong>troduced from two dimensions: under<br />
the theme of ‘fem<strong>in</strong>ist social work’ and under the theme of ‘anti-sexist<br />
social work’. One challeng<strong>in</strong>g discussion that emerges from this analysis is the<br />
question of how we reconcile the evidence that while gender <strong>in</strong>equality is still<br />
evident <strong>in</strong> the public sphere with women be<strong>in</strong>g underrepresented especially at<br />
higher levels of management and government, <strong>in</strong> social work it is also necessary<br />
to reflect critically on how gender stereotyp<strong>in</strong>g and sexist th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g affects how<br />
<strong>in</strong>terventions with the family occur, especially <strong>in</strong> terms of such themes as: how<br />
men are perceived as ‘carers’ or ‘parents’; gendered responses <strong>in</strong> child welfare<br />
and protection work; the impact of <strong>in</strong>creased gender equality on young males,<br />
and so on.<br />
To explore this dilemma, an <strong>in</strong>teractive quiz focused on the question of<br />
‘How much have we achieved gender equality <strong>in</strong> a) the workplace and b) the<br />
home’ is used. Questions are raised about such contemporary issues as: pay<br />
gaps between men and women; the number of women <strong>in</strong> public service management;<br />
the proportion of women <strong>in</strong> government positions; and the gender<br />
breakdown <strong>in</strong> universities and on particular courses. Statistics from official data<br />
sources are used to highlight that on the one hand, significant achievements<br />
have been made <strong>in</strong> relation to gender equality while at the same time, <strong>in</strong>equalities<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be prevalent. This opens up the possibility of debates as to why,<br />
for example, the majority of part-time workers are women and how, despite<br />
equal opportunities legislation, women cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be underrepresented <strong>in</strong><br />
key positions of power <strong>in</strong> society. <strong>Social</strong> work itself is an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g case study<br />
25