06.03.2015 Views

Teaching Gender in Social Work - MailChimp

Teaching Gender in Social Work - MailChimp

Teaching Gender in Social Work - MailChimp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• learn<strong>in</strong>g and teach<strong>in</strong>g about family work skills and techniques;<br />

• prepar<strong>in</strong>g social work students for fieldwork placements <strong>in</strong> agencies<br />

that work with families;<br />

• provid<strong>in</strong>g a basis for discussion <strong>in</strong> supervision;<br />

• develop<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>in</strong> the form of a refresher course or where a<br />

practitioner is new to family work or chang<strong>in</strong>g his or her role <strong>in</strong> an<br />

organisation;<br />

• show<strong>in</strong>g potentially anxious families what to expect <strong>in</strong> family<br />

counsell<strong>in</strong>g; and<br />

• offer<strong>in</strong>g a means of understand<strong>in</strong>g the powerful <strong>in</strong>fluence of family<br />

dynamics when work<strong>in</strong>g with family sub-systems and/or <strong>in</strong>dividuals.<br />

Audiences evidently differ <strong>in</strong> terms of how they capture the content and<br />

<strong>in</strong> their ability to criticise what they have seen. Some do so from an elementary<br />

level, focus<strong>in</strong>g mostly on content and the narrative story of the family, while<br />

others add to this an ability to critique the process and skills demonstrated, based<br />

on their own models of practice. Ellis and Garland 40 describe work<strong>in</strong>g with the<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g material, thereby giv<strong>in</strong>g us some tips on the teach<strong>in</strong>g process:<br />

This lesson was conducted with f<strong>in</strong>al year students. An <strong>in</strong>structor has shown the material<br />

twice. On the first show<strong>in</strong>g, students were asked to critique the video. Some<br />

responded to this task by say<strong>in</strong>g what was wrong with the demonstrated practice, while<br />

others were able to identify and name skills, but to vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees without an <strong>in</strong>formed<br />

basis for the critique. On the second show<strong>in</strong>g, students were asked to consider<br />

how implement<strong>in</strong>g a different model of practice would change the questions asked and<br />

skills utilised. This promoted engagement with the video material on a different and<br />

deeper level. It also enabled these f<strong>in</strong>al year students, who were consolidat<strong>in</strong>g their own<br />

model of practice, to extend their understand<strong>in</strong>g of systemic and narrative approaches<br />

to family work if these are their preferred approaches, or to compare and contrast these<br />

approaches with another model, for example a cognitive-behavioural approach.<br />

40<br />

Ibid.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!