06.03.2015 Views

Teaching Gender in Social Work - MailChimp

Teaching Gender in Social Work - MailChimp

Teaching Gender in Social Work - MailChimp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wave of Fem<strong>in</strong>ism. Reclaim<strong>in</strong>g the power to control and manage one’s body<br />

is a theme that features prom<strong>in</strong>ently with<strong>in</strong> both women’s activist groups and<br />

fem<strong>in</strong>ist theory. The history of women is a story about their bodies, for they<br />

have long been regarded as noth<strong>in</strong>g more than mere bodies. 5 Women must<br />

beg<strong>in</strong> to speak about their bodies themselves, thereby chang<strong>in</strong>g longstand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

beliefs. They can do so with the help of sexual difference theories, which are<br />

aimed at deconstruct<strong>in</strong>g or “underm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the idea of the ‘natural’ cornerstones<br />

of socially encoded differences, the system of values and representations”. 6<br />

It is important to determ<strong>in</strong>e how the body is affected by social relations,<br />

processes and <strong>in</strong>stitutions, as physicality derives from social phenomena. Foucault’s<br />

analysis of discipl<strong>in</strong>e, punishment, <strong>in</strong>sanity and sexuality reveals that power is<br />

<strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> the discourses that construct human embodiment. Foucault described<br />

his work as constitut<strong>in</strong>g a history of bodies, central to which is a mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

body and the effects of power upon it. His theory of knowledge suggests that<br />

the body is constructed through various discourses; it ceases to exist beyond the<br />

discursive, disappear<strong>in</strong>g as a material phenomenon. 7 Human physicality can<br />

never be fully def<strong>in</strong>ed, as the body is constantly deferred beh<strong>in</strong>d a grip of<br />

previously exist<strong>in</strong>g mean<strong>in</strong>gs which have been imposed by various discursive<br />

practices. The relationship between the m<strong>in</strong>d and the body determ<strong>in</strong>es the<br />

manner <strong>in</strong> which the body is conta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> modern discipl<strong>in</strong>ary systems,<br />

with the m<strong>in</strong>d consequently tak<strong>in</strong>g over as the location for discursive power.<br />

Braidotti dist<strong>in</strong>guishes between the gender discourse and the sexual<br />

difference discourse. <strong>Gender</strong> theoreticians focus predom<strong>in</strong>antly on how<br />

gender is <strong>in</strong>fluenced by cultural and social processes, whilst the sexual difference<br />

discourse <strong>in</strong>volves the unconscious or the desire and identification. Historically,<br />

the relation between the genders has been dom<strong>in</strong>ated by power relations.<br />

These have determ<strong>in</strong>ed the social position of the genders throughout time,<br />

with women experienc<strong>in</strong>g the impact of such disqualifications <strong>in</strong> their physical<br />

existence. Regardless of whether one believes <strong>in</strong> a pre-social body which is free<br />

of any mean<strong>in</strong>g and available for the recognition of its true nature, or rather<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that such essentialist approaches can only form part of the prevail<strong>in</strong>g<br />

discourses about women, the basic convictions about sexual difference or the<br />

5<br />

Cather<strong>in</strong>e Fouquet, “The Unavoidable Detour: Must a History of Women Beg<strong>in</strong> with the History of Their Bodies?”<br />

<strong>in</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g Women’s History, ed. Michelle Perott (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984), 51–61.<br />

6<br />

Rosi Braidotti, “Koncept spolne razlike” (Concept of sexual difference). Delta vol. 4, no. 2-3, (1998), 59–71.<br />

7<br />

Michel Foucault, Discipl<strong>in</strong>e and Punish: the Birth of the Prison (New York: Random House, 1975).<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!