06.03.2015 Views

The Thoughts of Marcus Aurelius - College of Stoic Philosophers

The Thoughts of Marcus Aurelius - College of Stoic Philosophers

The Thoughts of Marcus Aurelius - College of Stoic Philosophers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE PHILOSOPHY OF ANTONINUS 47<br />

Now, though<br />

there is<br />

great<br />

difficulty in understanding<br />

all the passages <strong>of</strong> Antoninus, in which he speaks <strong>of</strong> Nature,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the changes <strong>of</strong> things and <strong>of</strong> the economy <strong>of</strong> the universe,<br />

I am convinced that his sense <strong>of</strong> Nature and Natural is<br />

the same as that which I have stated ;<br />

and as he was a<br />

man who knew how to use words in a clear way and with<br />

strict consistency, we ought to assume, even if his mean<br />

ing in some passages is doubtful, that his view <strong>of</strong> Nature<br />

vas in harmony with his fixed belief in the all-pervading,<br />

ever present, and ever active energy <strong>of</strong> God (i, 4 ; iv, 40 ;<br />

x, 1 ; vi, 40 ;<br />

and other passages. Compare Seneca, De<br />

Benef. iv, 7. Swedenborg, Angelic Wisdom, 349-357).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is much in Antoninus that is hard to understand,<br />

and it<br />

might be said that he did not fully comprehend all<br />

that he wrote ; which would however be in no way remark<br />

able, for it<br />

happens now that a man may write what<br />

neither he nor anybody can understand. Antoninus tells us<br />

(xn, 10) to look at things and see what they are, resolving<br />

them into the material (v\rj), the causal (airiov), and<br />

the relation (avafopd), or the purpose, by which he seems<br />

to mean something in the nature <strong>of</strong> what we call effect,<br />

or end. <strong>The</strong> word Cause (air fa) is the difficulty. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />

the same word in the Sanscrit (hetu) ;<br />

and the subtle<br />

philosophers <strong>of</strong> India and <strong>of</strong> Greece, and the less subtle<br />

philosophers <strong>of</strong> modern times have all used this word, or<br />

an equivalent word, in a vague way. Yet the confusion<br />

sometimes may be in the inevitable ambiguity <strong>of</strong> language<br />

rather than in the mind <strong>of</strong> the writer, for I cannot think<br />

that some <strong>of</strong> the wisest <strong>of</strong> men did not know what they<br />

intended to say. When Antoninus says (iv, 36), that<br />

everything that exists is in a manner the seed <strong>of</strong> that which<br />

those is founded all the thought that man has. But let him know<br />

that the thoughts are limited and confined in proportion as they<br />

partake <strong>of</strong> time, <strong>of</strong> space, and <strong>of</strong> what is material ;<br />

and that they are<br />

not limited and are extended, in proportion as they do not partake<br />

<strong>of</strong> those things ;<br />

since the mind is so far elevated above the things<br />

corporeal and worldly (Concerning Heaven and Hell, 169).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!