Night noise guidelines for Europe - WHO/Europe - World Health ...
Night noise guidelines for Europe - WHO/Europe - World Health ...
Night noise guidelines for Europe - WHO/Europe - World Health ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12<br />
METHODS AND CRITERIA<br />
1.3.6 BACKGROUND LEVEL<br />
A simple definition of background level or “ambient <strong>noise</strong>” level is the <strong>noise</strong> that is<br />
not targeted <strong>for</strong> measurement or calculation. Background <strong>noise</strong> can interfere with<br />
the target <strong>noise</strong> in a number of ways. It can:<br />
• mask the signal<br />
• interact physically<br />
• interact psychologically.<br />
As this report is often dealing with low-level target <strong>noise</strong>, masking is an important<br />
issue. The other two interactions are more important in the domain of annoyance.<br />
Masking, however, is a complex process. The human auditory system is uncannily<br />
good at separating signals from “background”. Microphones (and the software behind<br />
them) have been slow to catch up, as the unsatisfactory results show when it comes to<br />
automatically recognizing aircraft in long-term unmanned measuring stations.<br />
The rule of thumb that a <strong>noise</strong> can be considered masked if the signal is 10 dB below<br />
the background is only valid if the <strong>noise</strong>s have the same frequency composition and<br />
if they actually occur at the same time. This is particularly important to stress where<br />
L Aeq levels are compared: even a relatively continuous motorway of 50 dB cannot<br />
mask aircraft <strong>noise</strong> of 30 dB, because this may be composed of five aircraft arriving<br />
at an L Amax of 57 dB. Neither can birdsong, because the frequency domains do not<br />
overlap.<br />
Another factor relevant <strong>for</strong> this report is that background levels are lower at nighttime<br />
than they are in the daytime. This is true <strong>for</strong> most man-made <strong>noise</strong>s, but also<br />
<strong>for</strong> the natural background levels as wind speeds at night slow down.<br />
Most levels mentioned in this report do not take background levels into account –<br />
explicitly. Where long-term L Aeq levels are related to effects like hypertension and<br />
self-reported sleep disturbance, background levels are ignored, but they could<br />
obscure the effect at the lower end of the scale. This then influences the lowest level<br />
where an effect starts to occur.<br />
In sleep laboratory studies the background level is kept as low as possible, around<br />
30 dB. The background of the instrumentation is 20 dB.<br />
In semi-field experiments it has been found that background <strong>noise</strong> levels inside bedrooms<br />
are very low, partly because people tend to choose their bedrooms on the<br />
quiet side of the building. This may have the side-effect of exposing children to higher<br />
levels.<br />
1.3.7 CHOICE OF INDICATORS FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES<br />
From the scientific point of view the correct choice <strong>for</strong> a <strong>noise</strong> indicator is its per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
in predicting the effect. There are, however, a number of additional criteria which<br />
may influence the choice. Firstly, <strong>for</strong> different health end points different indicators<br />
could be suitable. Further considerations are of a more political nature, as mentioned in<br />
the Position Paper on EU <strong>noise</strong> indicators (<strong>Europe</strong>an Commission, 2000). Indicators<br />
should also be easy to explain to the public – intuitively understandable, avoiding<br />
unnecessary breaks with current practice and en<strong>for</strong>ceable. This is probably why in many<br />
countries L Amax is a popular indicator: it has undeniable qualities in these areas.<br />
NIGHT NOISE GUIDELINES FOR EUROPE