02.04.2015 Views

Ibid - Australian Army

Ibid - Australian Army

Ibid - Australian Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Land Warfare Studies Centre 74<br />

contingency, there was a need for more emphasis on higher-level<br />

military thinking, organisation and doctrine. 300<br />

<strong>Army</strong> Doctrine and the Culture of Anti-intellectualism<br />

A fourth problem that the <strong>Army</strong> has encountered is that of an<br />

anti-intellectual culture within its ranks. A striking characteristic of<br />

the <strong>Australian</strong> Regular <strong>Army</strong> is the paradox of an officer corps<br />

composed of many highly talented individuals but possessing<br />

a weak collective intellectual ethos. As a measure of the <strong>Army</strong>’s<br />

individual excellence, it is worth noting that, of the nine Chiefs of<br />

the Defence Force Staff and Chiefs of the Defence Force between<br />

1976 and 1998, five have been <strong>Army</strong> officers holding office for<br />

a collective period of fifteen years. 301 In stark contrast, a lack of<br />

collective intellectual rigour in the <strong>Army</strong>’s culture has affected both<br />

doctrine development and intellectual debate over the last quarter of<br />

a century. In terms of doctrine development, progress has often<br />

been compartmentalised and dependent on what one senior officer<br />

has called ‘the intellectual horsepower of individuals’ rather than on<br />

institutional effort. 302<br />

The officer corps has often demonstrated an intellectual reluctance<br />

to debate new concepts in the context of a doctrinal framework. For<br />

example, operational concepts such as ‘defensive manoeuvre with<br />

a counter-stroke capability’ first advanced by the CGS, Lieutenant<br />

General John Grey, in 1993, and ‘strategic manoeuvre’, which was<br />

formulated by Lieutenant General Sanderson in 1995, were never<br />

fully debated by the officer corps. 303 In the 1995 Statement of<br />

300<br />

301<br />

302<br />

303<br />

<strong>Ibid</strong>.<br />

See Jeffrey Grey, A Military History of Australia, Cambridge<br />

University Press, Cambridge, rev. edn 1999, Appendix 1.<br />

Author’s discussion with Colonel Vincent Williams, Director,<br />

Doctrine Wing, CATDC, 20 August 1998.<br />

Lieutenant General J. C. Grey, ‘Land Aspects of <strong>Australian</strong> Strategy’,<br />

Journal of the Royal United Services Institute of Australia,<br />

October 1993, XIV, i, pp. 32–4. Lieutenant General J. M. Sanderson,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!