2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey
2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey
2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
18<br />
Svante E. Cornell and Halil Magnus Karaveli<br />
Bank economist Kemal Dervis, who was Minister of Economy in the centrist<br />
government in 2002, it was followed very closely by the AKP government<br />
once it came to power toward the end of that year.<br />
The prospect of EU accession has been the political facilitator of responsible<br />
economic policies, coupled with the political stability of a single-party<br />
government under the AKP. Whether <strong>Turkey</strong> will continue along the<br />
current, positive path of economic progress is hence dependent partly on<br />
global trends – such as the current status of the world economy – and<br />
domestic trends, especially the prospects of political stability. That said,<br />
<strong>Turkey</strong>’s economy has substantial problems in terms of the current account<br />
deficit, which in the past five years amounted to a total of $118 billion.<br />
Likewise, debt has been rising: domestic debt grew by 70 percent from 2002 to<br />
2007, while foreign debt spiked by 83 percent in the same period. While debt<br />
figures need to be seen in the context of rapidly growing GDP, they are<br />
nevertheless high. Total debt in 2007 stood at half a trillion dollars. Likewise,<br />
<strong>Turkey</strong> has seen a growth in its foreign trade deficit, both in absolute and<br />
relative terms. In 2007, the rate of exports to imports was 62 percent, 8 points<br />
down from 2002.<br />
On the basis of the current trends of the past decade, most economic<br />
forecasts have suggested that <strong>Turkey</strong> stands a good chance of continuing to<br />
be a relatively rapidly growing economy in the coming decade and beyond.<br />
Such positive scenarios assume that <strong>Turkey</strong>’s integration with Europe will<br />
continue, and that a modicum of political stability will prevail over the<br />
decades. In this scenario, the major opportunities for continued integration of<br />
<strong>Turkey</strong>’s economy with Europe are foreseen, most specifically in the banking<br />
sector and a continued growth of Foreign Direct Investment, which has yet,<br />
certainly in per capita terms, failed to reach the levels of the Central and<br />
Eastern European countries.<br />
Based on such a scenario, <strong>Turkey</strong>’s economy could grow by an average of<br />
over 4 percent until 2020, translating into a GDP per capita growth of close to<br />
3 percent annually in a good scenario. That would bring <strong>Turkey</strong> to a GDP<br />
per capita of us$11,000 in purchasing power parity terms by the end of the<br />
next decade, comparable to Poland in 2003. Meanwhile, alternative scenarios<br />
are also plausible. Scenarios that see a return to the political instability and